59. IUD Insertion in Out-of-OR Sedation Clinic in the Adolescent Population

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jpag.2025.01.092
Abigail Iseyemi , Hava Starkman , Tobias Everett , Heather Millar , Lisa Allen
{"title":"59. IUD Insertion in Out-of-OR Sedation Clinic in the Adolescent Population","authors":"Abigail Iseyemi ,&nbsp;Hava Starkman ,&nbsp;Tobias Everett ,&nbsp;Heather Millar ,&nbsp;Lisa Allen","doi":"10.1016/j.jpag.2025.01.092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hormonal Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) are important contraceptives and treatment for adolescent menstrual disorders. However, uptake may be limited in adolescents in the clinic setting for concerns that it may be painful and anxiety-provoking. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology at SickKids Hospital offers IUD insertion under anesthetic in the operating room (OR) but wait times are long. The primary goal of this study is to assess the implementation of an out-of-OR sedation program for IUD insertion on wait times. Secondary goals are to assess if a sedation program increases the likelihood of selecting an IUD, reduces anxiety and provides a positive insertion experience.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective review of IUD insertions in a tertiary institution in 3 settings: clinic, OR and a sedation clinic. OR cases occurred between June 2022 - June 2023, and sedation cases from June 2023 - June 2024. Wait times (days) were calculated from booking date to procedure date. Data was extracted from the electronic medical record. Patients under age 18 seeking IUD insertion were included. Exclusion criteria for sedation were BMI ≥30 due to anaesthetic limitations, severe developmental disability, and patients consented before roll out of sedation (June 2023). A brief survey is in progress for the sedation and clinic setting, to assess patient experience. Quality Improvement approval was obtained through SickKids Hospital. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics, with p-values ≤0.05 statistically significant. Analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>83 patients met inclusion criteria, (N=9 clinic, N=37 OR, and N=37 sedation). There were significant differences between BMI, age, and sexual history for each setting. Due to anaesthetic protocols, BMI in the clinic and the OR was higher than in sedation (p = 0.007). Patients were older in the sedation group (M = 16.05) compared to the OR (M = 15.35), (p =0.044). Most patients in clinic (88.9%) were sexually active, higher compared to OR and sedation (p&lt; 0.001). Procedure wait time was lower in sedation (M = 66.05 days) compared to the OR (M =172.00 days), (p&lt; 0.001). There was no difference in diagnosis for OR vs sedation in terms of menstrual indications for IUD insertion. Primary sedatives were ketamine and midazolam for sedation (97%), and propofol and dexmedetomidine for OR (41%). Complication rates and comorbidities were similar between groups. Survey results are pending.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The sedation program significantly improves access to care with shorter wait times. This supports broader adoption of sedation programs to enhance gynecologic care for adolescents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","volume":"38 2","pages":"Page 257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083318825001123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hormonal Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) are important contraceptives and treatment for adolescent menstrual disorders. However, uptake may be limited in adolescents in the clinic setting for concerns that it may be painful and anxiety-provoking. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology at SickKids Hospital offers IUD insertion under anesthetic in the operating room (OR) but wait times are long. The primary goal of this study is to assess the implementation of an out-of-OR sedation program for IUD insertion on wait times. Secondary goals are to assess if a sedation program increases the likelihood of selecting an IUD, reduces anxiety and provides a positive insertion experience.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of IUD insertions in a tertiary institution in 3 settings: clinic, OR and a sedation clinic. OR cases occurred between June 2022 - June 2023, and sedation cases from June 2023 - June 2024. Wait times (days) were calculated from booking date to procedure date. Data was extracted from the electronic medical record. Patients under age 18 seeking IUD insertion were included. Exclusion criteria for sedation were BMI ≥30 due to anaesthetic limitations, severe developmental disability, and patients consented before roll out of sedation (June 2023). A brief survey is in progress for the sedation and clinic setting, to assess patient experience. Quality Improvement approval was obtained through SickKids Hospital. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics, with p-values ≤0.05 statistically significant. Analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics software.

Results

83 patients met inclusion criteria, (N=9 clinic, N=37 OR, and N=37 sedation). There were significant differences between BMI, age, and sexual history for each setting. Due to anaesthetic protocols, BMI in the clinic and the OR was higher than in sedation (p = 0.007). Patients were older in the sedation group (M = 16.05) compared to the OR (M = 15.35), (p =0.044). Most patients in clinic (88.9%) were sexually active, higher compared to OR and sedation (p< 0.001). Procedure wait time was lower in sedation (M = 66.05 days) compared to the OR (M =172.00 days), (p< 0.001). There was no difference in diagnosis for OR vs sedation in terms of menstrual indications for IUD insertion. Primary sedatives were ketamine and midazolam for sedation (97%), and propofol and dexmedetomidine for OR (41%). Complication rates and comorbidities were similar between groups. Survey results are pending.

Conclusions

The sedation program significantly improves access to care with shorter wait times. This supports broader adoption of sedation programs to enhance gynecologic care for adolescents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
251
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology includes all aspects of clinical and basic science research in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. The Journal draws on expertise from a variety of disciplines including pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, reproduction and gynecology, reproductive and pediatric endocrinology, genetics, and molecular biology. The Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology features original studies, review articles, book and literature reviews, letters to the editor, and communications in brief. It is an essential resource for the libraries of OB/GYN specialists, as well as pediatricians and primary care physicians.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Transdermal Estrogen Therapy on Bone and Neurobehavioral Health in Youth with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: A Case-Control Study. EFFECTS OF COMBINED HORMONAL CONTRACEPTIVES (CHC) ON BONE HEALTH IN ADOLESCENT GIRLS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Maternal factors during pregnancy and pubertal timing in offspring: A systematic review of the literature. Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1