Low-cost carrier development under airline-within-airline strategy: Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101305
Weicheng Wang , Xiaowen Fu , Kun Wang , Xiaoqian Sun , Sebastian Wandelt , Jianda Wang , Xiangru Wu
{"title":"Low-cost carrier development under airline-within-airline strategy: Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review","authors":"Weicheng Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Fu ,&nbsp;Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoqian Sun ,&nbsp;Sebastian Wandelt ,&nbsp;Jianda Wang ,&nbsp;Xiangru Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the advent of aviation deregulation, the rapid development of low-cost carriers (LCCs) has posed significant competitive pressures to established airlines, particularly full-service carriers (FSCs). In response to these challenges, FSCs have undergone substantial operational strategy reforms. One such response has been adopting the airline-within-airline (AWA) strategy, wherein FSCs establish subsidiary LCCs. These subsidiary LCCs are either utilised as fighting brands to compete with major LCC competitors directly or to expand the market coverage of the parent airline. However, not all subsidiary LCCs have succeeded, and their impacts on the market competition structure and outcomes have varied significantly. We aim to provide a thorough review of existing studies and address a series of vital questions, including the market impact of AWA, incentives for adopting such strategy, and the successful operation patterns of subsidiary LCCs under the AWA framework. To ensure the breadth and depth of our review, we construct an article database and employ semantic analysis to capture relevant studies' titles, keywords, and abstracts. We summarise and report the adopted research methodologies, aviation markets studied, keywords and author co-occurrence networks, as well as research trends and gaps in previous literature. Through bibliometric analysis, we identify the importance of subsidiary autonomy and coordinating labour policy between low-cost and full-service group members. Meanwhile, the changing dynamic of airline competition requires flexible adjustment in route configuration, and up-to-date empirical investigation is necessary to understand airline group strategy. The significant disruption brought by the COVID-19 pandemic has not been detailly studied for AWA. Our literature review could provide insights into the current state of research in this area while also identifying future research opportunities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101305"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525000203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the advent of aviation deregulation, the rapid development of low-cost carriers (LCCs) has posed significant competitive pressures to established airlines, particularly full-service carriers (FSCs). In response to these challenges, FSCs have undergone substantial operational strategy reforms. One such response has been adopting the airline-within-airline (AWA) strategy, wherein FSCs establish subsidiary LCCs. These subsidiary LCCs are either utilised as fighting brands to compete with major LCC competitors directly or to expand the market coverage of the parent airline. However, not all subsidiary LCCs have succeeded, and their impacts on the market competition structure and outcomes have varied significantly. We aim to provide a thorough review of existing studies and address a series of vital questions, including the market impact of AWA, incentives for adopting such strategy, and the successful operation patterns of subsidiary LCCs under the AWA framework. To ensure the breadth and depth of our review, we construct an article database and employ semantic analysis to capture relevant studies' titles, keywords, and abstracts. We summarise and report the adopted research methodologies, aviation markets studied, keywords and author co-occurrence networks, as well as research trends and gaps in previous literature. Through bibliometric analysis, we identify the importance of subsidiary autonomy and coordinating labour policy between low-cost and full-service group members. Meanwhile, the changing dynamic of airline competition requires flexible adjustment in route configuration, and up-to-date empirical investigation is necessary to understand airline group strategy. The significant disruption brought by the COVID-19 pandemic has not been detailly studied for AWA. Our literature review could provide insights into the current state of research in this area while also identifying future research opportunities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航空公司中航空战略下的低成本航空公司发展:文献计量分析与系统文献综述
随着航空业放松管制的到来,低成本航空公司(lcc)的迅速发展给老牌航空公司,特别是全服务航空公司(fsc)带来了巨大的竞争压力。为了应对这些挑战,金融服务公司进行了实质性的业务战略改革。其中一种应对措施是采用航空公司内部的航空公司(AWA)战略,即fsc建立子公司低成本航空公司。这些附属低成本航空公司要么作为战斗品牌直接与主要低成本航空公司竞争,要么扩大母公司的市场覆盖范围。然而,并非所有的子公司低成本公司都取得了成功,它们对市场竞争结构和结果的影响也有很大差异。我们的目标是全面检讨现有的研究,并探讨一系列重要的问题,包括“空中巴士服务”的市场影响、采取这种策略的诱因,以及附属航空公司在“空中巴士服务”框架下的成功运作模式。为了确保我们综述的广度和深度,我们构建了一个文章数据库,并使用语义分析来获取相关研究的标题、关键词和摘要。我们总结和报告了采用的研究方法、研究的航空市场、关键词和作者共现网络,以及以往文献的研究趋势和差距。通过文献计量分析,我们确定了低成本和全服务集团成员之间附属自主性和协调劳动政策的重要性。同时,航空公司竞争的动态变化要求航线配置的灵活调整,了解航空公司集团战略需要最新的实证研究。新冠肺炎大流行带来的重大破坏尚未对AWA进行详细研究。我们的文献综述可以为这一领域的研究现状提供见解,同时也可以确定未来的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
期刊最新文献
Dry port development and hinterland air quality: Evidence from dry port developments in China Multi-scale spatiotemporal analysis of shared bike-metro interactions in Shanghai: Implications for sustainable urban mobility Commuting of teaching and administrative staff as a driver of sustainable transport policy at the university Does travel captivity affect the MaaS plan uptake? Flexible tickets and strategic revenue management in high-speed rail market competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1