Swipe right to consent: How dating app usage by young adults contributes to sexual objectification and sexual consent miscommunication

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108621
Andrea M. Smith , Adriana S. Mucedola , Katelyn La , Rebecca R. Ortiz , Yu Tian
{"title":"Swipe right to consent: How dating app usage by young adults contributes to sexual objectification and sexual consent miscommunication","authors":"Andrea M. Smith ,&nbsp;Adriana S. Mucedola ,&nbsp;Katelyn La ,&nbsp;Rebecca R. Ortiz ,&nbsp;Yu Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although mobile dating applications (apps) are one of the most common ways for young adults in the United States to meet potential dating partners, online dating platforms have been inadequately examined in relation to young adults' offline sexual health practices. Grounded in objectification theory, this study explored how young adults' use of dating apps—and specifically whether their sexualized perceptions of and interactions with others—related to their ability to discuss sexual consent with sexual partners they met on those apps. We conducted an online survey of a national sample (<em>N</em> = 1045) of young adults in the U.S. on this topic. Results revealed that the more frequently participants used dating apps, the more they engaged in the sexual objectification of others on dating apps. Participants who were prone to sexually objectifying others on dating apps were also more likely to endorse ‘digital consent cues’ (the assumption that matching or exchanging DMs implies consent to sex) and reported greater difficulty discussing sexual consent with partners they met through such apps. The study yields insights into how dating apps and their technological affordances may alter or dimmish offline conversations about consent, making theoretical contributions and proposing solutions to foster the development of healthy and equitable sexual relationships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 108621"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000688","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although mobile dating applications (apps) are one of the most common ways for young adults in the United States to meet potential dating partners, online dating platforms have been inadequately examined in relation to young adults' offline sexual health practices. Grounded in objectification theory, this study explored how young adults' use of dating apps—and specifically whether their sexualized perceptions of and interactions with others—related to their ability to discuss sexual consent with sexual partners they met on those apps. We conducted an online survey of a national sample (N = 1045) of young adults in the U.S. on this topic. Results revealed that the more frequently participants used dating apps, the more they engaged in the sexual objectification of others on dating apps. Participants who were prone to sexually objectifying others on dating apps were also more likely to endorse ‘digital consent cues’ (the assumption that matching or exchanging DMs implies consent to sex) and reported greater difficulty discussing sexual consent with partners they met through such apps. The study yields insights into how dating apps and their technological affordances may alter or dimmish offline conversations about consent, making theoretical contributions and proposing solutions to foster the development of healthy and equitable sexual relationships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
Cyberhate among Ukrainian adolescents in war-torn Ukraine: A study of exposure, victimization, and perpetration An assistant or A friend? The role of parasocial relationship of human-computer interaction Communicating through #hashtags: Influencing perceptions of personality and trust Editorial Board From human-machine collaboration to deviation: Understanding the catastrophe and resilience mechanisms of human-machine behaviors in intelligent environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1