Tuan Kiet Pham , Graeme A. Snook , Dean Glass , Amanda V. Ellis
{"title":"Lithium-ion diffusion behaviour in silicon nanoparticle/graphite blended anodes","authors":"Tuan Kiet Pham , Graeme A. Snook , Dean Glass , Amanda V. Ellis","doi":"10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An attractive approach to improving lithium-ion battery graphite anode capacity is the addition of high-capacity silicon (Si) nanoparticles (NPs). However, there is currently limited understanding of the evolution of the overpotential that is generated in the new types of anodes with increasing Si content. In this work both the synergistic and antagonistic effects of Si NPs (0–15 wt-%) blended with spheronized natural graphite was investigated. The overpotential was determined by comparing the corresponding peak positions in graphite and the Si NP/graphite blends using differential capacity (dQ dV<sup>−1</sup>) analysis. Li<sup>+</sup>-ion diffusion coefficients were calculated via the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) at different stages of (de)lithiation, before and after low and high current rate cycling. Results show that there is a clear interplay between graphite and Si NPs in the Li<sup>+</sup>-ion diffusion into (lithiation) and out (delithiation) of these materials. Graphite dominates during phase transitions, while Si NPs dominate when graphite undergoes liquid-like Li<sup>+</sup>-ion diffusion. No change was observed in the overpotential with a Si NP content <12 wt-%, both at initial lithiation and at the end of delithiation. However, as the Si NP content increased to 15 wt-% the lithium-ion diffusion lowered, reducing the graphite-based anodes' rate capability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Power Sources","volume":"638 ","pages":"Article 236623"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Power Sources","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378775325004598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An attractive approach to improving lithium-ion battery graphite anode capacity is the addition of high-capacity silicon (Si) nanoparticles (NPs). However, there is currently limited understanding of the evolution of the overpotential that is generated in the new types of anodes with increasing Si content. In this work both the synergistic and antagonistic effects of Si NPs (0–15 wt-%) blended with spheronized natural graphite was investigated. The overpotential was determined by comparing the corresponding peak positions in graphite and the Si NP/graphite blends using differential capacity (dQ dV−1) analysis. Li+-ion diffusion coefficients were calculated via the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) at different stages of (de)lithiation, before and after low and high current rate cycling. Results show that there is a clear interplay between graphite and Si NPs in the Li+-ion diffusion into (lithiation) and out (delithiation) of these materials. Graphite dominates during phase transitions, while Si NPs dominate when graphite undergoes liquid-like Li+-ion diffusion. No change was observed in the overpotential with a Si NP content <12 wt-%, both at initial lithiation and at the end of delithiation. However, as the Si NP content increased to 15 wt-% the lithium-ion diffusion lowered, reducing the graphite-based anodes' rate capability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Power Sources is a publication catering to researchers and technologists interested in various aspects of the science, technology, and applications of electrochemical power sources. It covers original research and reviews on primary and secondary batteries, fuel cells, supercapacitors, and photo-electrochemical cells.
Topics considered include the research, development and applications of nanomaterials and novel componentry for these devices. Examples of applications of these electrochemical power sources include:
• Portable electronics
• Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles
• Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) systems
• Storage of renewable energy
• Satellites and deep space probes
• Boats and ships, drones and aircrafts
• Wearable energy storage systems