Understanding the effects of spatial scaling on the relationship between urban structure and biodiversity

Dennis Heejoon Choi , Lindsay Darling , Jaeyoung Ha , Jinyuan Shao , Hunsoo Song , Songlin Fei , Brady S. Hardiman
{"title":"Understanding the effects of spatial scaling on the relationship between urban structure and biodiversity","authors":"Dennis Heejoon Choi ,&nbsp;Lindsay Darling ,&nbsp;Jaeyoung Ha ,&nbsp;Jinyuan Shao ,&nbsp;Hunsoo Song ,&nbsp;Songlin Fei ,&nbsp;Brady S. Hardiman","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consideration of spatial dependence in heterogeneous urban landscapes is crucial for understanding how urban landscapes shape biodiversity. However, understanding the linkage between urban landscape patterns, both vertically and horizontally, and urban-dwelling bird species at various spatial scales remains an unsolved question. Here, we investigated how patterns of vertical and horizontal urban landscape structure influence urban-dwelling bird species at various spatial scales in the Chicago Region. We utilize a high-density Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) dataset to exam ALS-derived metrics (foliage height diversity, canopy openness, and building volume) in relation to bird diversity.</div><div>Our results show that LiDAR-derived metrics exhibited significant variation across spatial scales. The negative impact of building volume on bird species is greatest at the smallest scale (slope = -0.24 at 50 m radius), but its effect declined as the scale increased (slope = 0.00 at 500 m radius). Foliage height diversity did not influence bird diversity at small spatial scales but shows a positive effect on bird diversity over 150 m radius (slope = 0.05 to 0.11). Canopy openness changed its sign of slope from negative to positive as the buffer radius increased (between 150 and 200 m buffer radii), indicating that openness may have different roles depending on the spatial scale. Based on our findings, a buffer radius of 150–200 m was concluded to be the threshold distinguishing local and landscape-level variables in this study.</div><div>In general, horizontal landscape patterns have a stronger influence on urban biodiversity than vertical structures. However, our findings suggest that enhancing the vertical complexity of canopy structures in existing green spaces could be an effective strategy for sustaining bird diversity in urban areas, particularly where expanding green spaces is not feasible. Our study enhances the understanding of urban biodiversity dynamics and provides practical implications for urban landscape management and planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104441"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225000883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consideration of spatial dependence in heterogeneous urban landscapes is crucial for understanding how urban landscapes shape biodiversity. However, understanding the linkage between urban landscape patterns, both vertically and horizontally, and urban-dwelling bird species at various spatial scales remains an unsolved question. Here, we investigated how patterns of vertical and horizontal urban landscape structure influence urban-dwelling bird species at various spatial scales in the Chicago Region. We utilize a high-density Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) dataset to exam ALS-derived metrics (foliage height diversity, canopy openness, and building volume) in relation to bird diversity.
Our results show that LiDAR-derived metrics exhibited significant variation across spatial scales. The negative impact of building volume on bird species is greatest at the smallest scale (slope = -0.24 at 50 m radius), but its effect declined as the scale increased (slope = 0.00 at 500 m radius). Foliage height diversity did not influence bird diversity at small spatial scales but shows a positive effect on bird diversity over 150 m radius (slope = 0.05 to 0.11). Canopy openness changed its sign of slope from negative to positive as the buffer radius increased (between 150 and 200 m buffer radii), indicating that openness may have different roles depending on the spatial scale. Based on our findings, a buffer radius of 150–200 m was concluded to be the threshold distinguishing local and landscape-level variables in this study.
In general, horizontal landscape patterns have a stronger influence on urban biodiversity than vertical structures. However, our findings suggest that enhancing the vertical complexity of canopy structures in existing green spaces could be an effective strategy for sustaining bird diversity in urban areas, particularly where expanding green spaces is not feasible. Our study enhances the understanding of urban biodiversity dynamics and provides practical implications for urban landscape management and planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间尺度对城市结构与生物多样性关系的影响
考虑异质性城市景观的空间依赖性对于理解城市景观如何塑造生物多样性至关重要。然而,在不同的空间尺度上,如何理解垂直和水平方向的城市景观格局与城市栖息鸟类之间的联系仍是一个有待解决的问题。本文以芝加哥地区为研究对象,研究了不同空间尺度下城市垂直和水平景观格局对城市栖息鸟类的影响。我们利用高密度机载激光扫描(ALS)数据集来检验ALS衍生的指标(树叶高度多样性、树冠开放度和建筑体积)与鸟类多样性的关系。我们的研究结果表明,激光雷达衍生的指标在空间尺度上表现出显著的变化。建筑体积对鸟类的负面影响在最小尺度下最大(50 m半径处坡度= -0.24),随着尺度的增大而减小(500 m半径处坡度= 0.00)。在小空间尺度上,叶高多样性对鸟类多样性没有影响,但在150m半径范围内对鸟类多样性有正向影响(斜率= 0.05 ~ 0.11)。随着缓冲半径的增大(缓冲半径在150 ~ 200 m之间),冠层开度的斜率由负向正变化,表明开度在不同的空间尺度上可能具有不同的作用。根据我们的研究结果,150-200 m的缓冲半径是区分局部和景观变量的阈值。总体而言,水平景观格局对城市生物多样性的影响强于垂直景观格局。然而,我们的研究结果表明,提高现有绿地中树冠结构的垂直复杂性可能是维持城市地区鸟类多样性的有效策略,特别是在扩大绿地不可行时。我们的研究增强了对城市生物多样性动态的认识,并为城市景观管理和规划提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Earth-Surface Processes, Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying the ability of bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) model to Respond to soil moisture and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) Evaluating Pléiades Neo capabilities for deriving rock glacier velocity Contrasting trends in climatic and ecohydrological aridity over one-fifth of global drylands Earth observation derived yield forecasting and estimation in low- and lower-middle-income countries dominated by smallholder agriculture: A review A global continuous 500 m nighttime light dataset (1992–2024) via NDVI-guided DMSP-OLS correction and U-TransNet cross-sensor harmonization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1