Using street view imagery and localized crowdsourcing survey to model perceived safety of the visual built environment by gender

Hanlin Zhou , Jue Wang , Kathi Wilson , Michael Widener , Devin Yongzhao Wu , Eric Xu
{"title":"Using street view imagery and localized crowdsourcing survey to model perceived safety of the visual built environment by gender","authors":"Hanlin Zhou ,&nbsp;Jue Wang ,&nbsp;Kathi Wilson ,&nbsp;Michael Widener ,&nbsp;Devin Yongzhao Wu ,&nbsp;Eric Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scholars have documented that perceived safety of the visual built environment (VBE) can influence human behaviors. The dual developments of street view imagery (SVI) and deep learning techniques offer a cost-effective approach to measure perceived safety. However, current SVI-based perception models often lack specific definitions of perceived safety and demographic information when collecting data for model training. Furthermore, these models are rarely validated by onsite perception evaluations, which undermines their credibility.</div><div>Given these gaps, this study builds a localized crowdsourcing survey to train crime-related and barrier-related perceived safety of the VBE captured by SVIs, and compares model-predicted perceptions with onsite perceptions. This study specifically focuses on their ability to represent onsite perceptions and examines gender differences as a test case in safety perception. This study recruits over 1,800 participants living in the Greater Toronto Area to rate SVIs in terms of crime-related and barrier-related perceived safety.</div><div>Pearson correlation coefficients reveal a positive but weak correlation between female and male safety perceptions, indicating some consistency while highlighting potential gender differences in safety perceptions. Machine-learning perception models are then trained using this localized SVI survey. Model-predicted perceptions are further validated to assess their alignments with onsite perceptions at sampling locations. The results show that model-predicted perceptions do not exactly match onsite perceptions but align better when less stringent criteria are applied (within ± 1 scale point).</div><div>In short, this study underscores the necessity of gender inclusivity and a clear definition of safety terms when using SVIs to model perceptions. While SVI-based perception models are cost-effective, the predicted perceptions cannot yet fully substitute onsite perceptions, necessitating broader research to refine the effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104421"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225000688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars have documented that perceived safety of the visual built environment (VBE) can influence human behaviors. The dual developments of street view imagery (SVI) and deep learning techniques offer a cost-effective approach to measure perceived safety. However, current SVI-based perception models often lack specific definitions of perceived safety and demographic information when collecting data for model training. Furthermore, these models are rarely validated by onsite perception evaluations, which undermines their credibility.
Given these gaps, this study builds a localized crowdsourcing survey to train crime-related and barrier-related perceived safety of the VBE captured by SVIs, and compares model-predicted perceptions with onsite perceptions. This study specifically focuses on their ability to represent onsite perceptions and examines gender differences as a test case in safety perception. This study recruits over 1,800 participants living in the Greater Toronto Area to rate SVIs in terms of crime-related and barrier-related perceived safety.
Pearson correlation coefficients reveal a positive but weak correlation between female and male safety perceptions, indicating some consistency while highlighting potential gender differences in safety perceptions. Machine-learning perception models are then trained using this localized SVI survey. Model-predicted perceptions are further validated to assess their alignments with onsite perceptions at sampling locations. The results show that model-predicted perceptions do not exactly match onsite perceptions but align better when less stringent criteria are applied (within ± 1 scale point).
In short, this study underscores the necessity of gender inclusivity and a clear definition of safety terms when using SVIs to model perceptions. While SVI-based perception models are cost-effective, the predicted perceptions cannot yet fully substitute onsite perceptions, necessitating broader research to refine the effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用街景图像和本地化的众包调查,按性别对视觉建筑环境的感知安全性进行建模
学者们已经证明,视觉建筑环境(VBE)的感知安全性可以影响人类的行为。街景图像(SVI)和深度学习技术的双重发展为测量感知安全性提供了一种经济有效的方法。然而,当前基于svi的感知模型在收集用于模型训练的数据时往往缺乏感知安全性和人口统计信息的具体定义。此外,这些模型很少得到现场感知评估的验证,这削弱了它们的可信度。鉴于这些差距,本研究建立了一个本地化的众包调查,以培训svi捕获的VBE与犯罪和障碍相关的感知安全性,并将模型预测的感知与现场感知进行比较。本研究特别关注他们代表现场感知的能力,并将性别差异作为安全感知的测试案例。这项研究招募了1800多名生活在大多伦多地区的参与者,让他们根据与犯罪相关的和与障碍相关的感知安全来评估svi。皮尔逊相关系数显示,女性和男性的安全感知之间存在正相关性,但相关性较弱,这表明在安全感知方面存在一定的一致性,同时也突出了潜在的性别差异。然后使用本地化的SVI调查来训练机器学习感知模型。进一步验证模型预测的感知,以评估其与采样地点的现场感知的一致性。结果表明,模型预测的感知并不完全匹配现场感知,但当应用较不严格的标准时(在±1个尺度点内),模型预测的感知会更好地匹配。简而言之,本研究强调了在使用svi建模认知时,性别包容性和安全术语明确定义的必要性。虽然基于svi的感知模型具有成本效益,但预测的感知还不能完全替代现场感知,需要更广泛的研究来完善有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Earth-Surface Processes, Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying the ability of bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) model to Respond to soil moisture and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) Evaluating Pléiades Neo capabilities for deriving rock glacier velocity Contrasting trends in climatic and ecohydrological aridity over one-fifth of global drylands Earth observation derived yield forecasting and estimation in low- and lower-middle-income countries dominated by smallholder agriculture: A review A global continuous 500 m nighttime light dataset (1992–2024) via NDVI-guided DMSP-OLS correction and U-TransNet cross-sensor harmonization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1