Lien Moreel , Michaël Doumen , Albrecht Betrains , Ellen De Langhe , Daniel Blockmans , Steven Vanderschueren
{"title":"Validation of the polymyalgia rheumatica-activity score: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Lien Moreel , Michaël Doumen , Albrecht Betrains , Ellen De Langhe , Daniel Blockmans , Steven Vanderschueren","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To validate the polymyalgia rheumatica-activity score (PMR-AS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective cohort study at the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium) between July 2022 and December 2023. We created a new alternative PMR-AS in which ability to elevate the upper limbs (EUL) was replaced by visual analogue scale (VAS) of functionality and both the severity and the duration of stiffness were evaluated. The discriminatory capacity for detecting active disease of the PMR-AS, the change in PMR-AS and several alternative scores were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and compared using Delong's tests. GEE-logistic prediction models were used to correct for repeated measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 133 PMR patients (419 visits). PMR-AS had a good discriminatory power with an AUC of 0.938 and an optimal cut-off point of 11.0 with corresponding sensitivity of 87 % and specificity of 87 %. The change in PMR-AS (AUC 0.862), clinical-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928) and imputed-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928) significantly performed worse in detecting active disease (all p≤0.010). The ESR-PMR-AS also tended to have a lower discriminatory capacity (AUC 0.932, p=0.050). Our alternative PMR-AS had a higher AUC (AUC 0.948, p=0.010) with an optimal cut-off point of 13.5 and corresponding sensitivity of 87 % and specificity of 88 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PMR-AS had a good discriminatory capacity for detecting active disease, but the alternative PMR-AS performed slightly better. Alternative activity scores which do not require the use of CRP performed slightly worse but can be used in case of treatment with glucocorticoid-sparing agents affecting the CRP level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 152695"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225000666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To validate the polymyalgia rheumatica-activity score (PMR-AS).
Methods
Prospective cohort study at the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium) between July 2022 and December 2023. We created a new alternative PMR-AS in which ability to elevate the upper limbs (EUL) was replaced by visual analogue scale (VAS) of functionality and both the severity and the duration of stiffness were evaluated. The discriminatory capacity for detecting active disease of the PMR-AS, the change in PMR-AS and several alternative scores were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and compared using Delong's tests. GEE-logistic prediction models were used to correct for repeated measures.
Results
We included 133 PMR patients (419 visits). PMR-AS had a good discriminatory power with an AUC of 0.938 and an optimal cut-off point of 11.0 with corresponding sensitivity of 87 % and specificity of 87 %. The change in PMR-AS (AUC 0.862), clinical-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928) and imputed-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928) significantly performed worse in detecting active disease (all p≤0.010). The ESR-PMR-AS also tended to have a lower discriminatory capacity (AUC 0.932, p=0.050). Our alternative PMR-AS had a higher AUC (AUC 0.948, p=0.010) with an optimal cut-off point of 13.5 and corresponding sensitivity of 87 % and specificity of 88 %.
Conclusion
PMR-AS had a good discriminatory capacity for detecting active disease, but the alternative PMR-AS performed slightly better. Alternative activity scores which do not require the use of CRP performed slightly worse but can be used in case of treatment with glucocorticoid-sparing agents affecting the CRP level.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.