A low-dose protocol in pediatric 18F-FDG scans using 30-cm axis field of view PET/CT.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Annals of Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s12149-025-02030-x
Ha Wu, Guobing Liu, Xiemei Ruan, Biying Zhang, Zheng Zhe, Hongcheng Shi
{"title":"A low-dose protocol in pediatric <sup>18</sup>F-FDG scans using 30-cm axis field of view PET/CT.","authors":"Ha Wu, Guobing Liu, Xiemei Ruan, Biying Zhang, Zheng Zhe, Hongcheng Shi","doi":"10.1007/s12149-025-02030-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the feasibility of a low-dose <sup>18</sup>F-FDG protocol for the 30-cm standard axial field of view (SAFOV) PET/CT imaging in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 112 pediatric patients who underwent a full-dose (3.7 MBq/kg) <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT imaging, and a prospective analysis was performed on 55 patients who received a low-dose (2.5 MBq/kg) imaging. PET images were reconstructed at 1.0-min/bed intervals, and labeled as G1.0, G2.0, G3.0 for the full-dose imaging and G1.0', G2.0', G3.0' for the low-dose imaging. Patients were categorized into three age groups, and the image quality was assessed using the Likert scale and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); Lesion detectability was evaluated using lesion detection rates and the target-to-liver ratio (TLR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In G2.0 and G3.0, all cases (112/112) achieved an image score of ≥ 3 and a lesion detection rate of 100% (98/98). There were no significant differences in SNR between G2.0 and G3.0 (11.09 ± 2.31 vs. 11.88 ± 2.58, p = 0.39), nor between age groups ≤ 5 years and 6-10 years groups (9.52 ± 3.16 vs. 9.53 ± 3.19, p = 0.99). In G3.0', 98.2% of cases (54/55) had an image score ≥ 3 and a lesion detection rate of 100% (43/43). The SNR of every age group for G3.0' was comparable to that of G2.0, and no significant differences between ≤ 5 years and 6-10 years groups (9.32 ± 1.94 vs. 9.99 ± 2.28, p = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 2.5 MBq/kg dose with a 3.0 min/bed acquisition protocol is feasible for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG 30-cm SAFOV PET/CT imaging in pediatric patients, and SNR and TLR demonstrated age-dependent discrepancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-025-02030-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the feasibility of a low-dose 18F-FDG protocol for the 30-cm standard axial field of view (SAFOV) PET/CT imaging in pediatric patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 112 pediatric patients who underwent a full-dose (3.7 MBq/kg) 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, and a prospective analysis was performed on 55 patients who received a low-dose (2.5 MBq/kg) imaging. PET images were reconstructed at 1.0-min/bed intervals, and labeled as G1.0, G2.0, G3.0 for the full-dose imaging and G1.0', G2.0', G3.0' for the low-dose imaging. Patients were categorized into three age groups, and the image quality was assessed using the Likert scale and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); Lesion detectability was evaluated using lesion detection rates and the target-to-liver ratio (TLR).

Results: In G2.0 and G3.0, all cases (112/112) achieved an image score of ≥ 3 and a lesion detection rate of 100% (98/98). There were no significant differences in SNR between G2.0 and G3.0 (11.09 ± 2.31 vs. 11.88 ± 2.58, p = 0.39), nor between age groups ≤ 5 years and 6-10 years groups (9.52 ± 3.16 vs. 9.53 ± 3.19, p = 0.99). In G3.0', 98.2% of cases (54/55) had an image score ≥ 3 and a lesion detection rate of 100% (43/43). The SNR of every age group for G3.0' was comparable to that of G2.0, and no significant differences between ≤ 5 years and 6-10 years groups (9.32 ± 1.94 vs. 9.99 ± 2.28, p = 0.82).

Conclusions: A 2.5 MBq/kg dose with a 3.0 min/bed acquisition protocol is feasible for 18F-FDG 30-cm SAFOV PET/CT imaging in pediatric patients, and SNR and TLR demonstrated age-dependent discrepancies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 30 厘米轴视野 PET/CT 进行小儿 18F-FDG 扫描的低剂量方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Ga-68 Pentixafor PET/CT in multiple myeloma and its correlation with clinical parameters: institutional pilot study. Insights into lung cancer diagnosis and clinical management using [18F]F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-42 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-PET as a non-invasive evaluation method of liver fibrosis. Differentiating second primary lung cancer from pulmonary metastasis in patients of single solitary pulmonary lesion with extrapulmonary tumor using multiparametric analysis of FDG PET/CT. Radiomics of lung ventilation/perfusion tomographic imaging in pulmonary embolism diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1