The impact of total sleep deprivation on attentional networks and its neural mechanisms: Based on the Attention Network Test

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115513
Ying Yang , Chen Yang , Changnan Guo , Li Mu
{"title":"The impact of total sleep deprivation on attentional networks and its neural mechanisms: Based on the Attention Network Test","authors":"Ying Yang ,&nbsp;Chen Yang ,&nbsp;Changnan Guo ,&nbsp;Li Mu","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sleep deprivation, both daily and occupational, has become a prevalent issue in modern society, significantly affecting individuals' attention functions. Traditionally, attention was viewed as a singular, unified system, but advances in neuroscience have revealed it as a network involving coordinated interactions across multiple brain regions. Posner and Petersen’s Attention Network Theory delineates three distinct subcomponents — alerting, orienting, and executive control — based on anatomical localization and neurobiochemical mechanisms. However, most studies on sleep deprivation often overlook these subcomponents, treating attention as a generalized process. This paper aims to address this gap by investigating the effects of total sleep deprivation (TSD) on these attentional subcomponents and their potential neural mechanisms focusing on both the general healthy population and specific occupational groups. Using the Attention Network Test (ANT) paradigm and its variants, the findings reveal that TSD differentially affects the three subcomponents of attentional networks, with occupation-specific differences. Notably, the impact of TSD on executive control exhibits greater variability. The state instability hypothesis and local sleep theory are proposed to explain these neural mechanisms, suggesting that TSD disrupts attentional networks through an interplay of top-down state instability and bottom-up local sleep processes. Future research should refine experimental paradigms related to attentional networks, integrate cognitive neuroscience methodologies and computational modeling approaches, and expand investigations into sleep restriction. Such advancements will provide a more comprehensive understanding of how TSD affects attentional networks and further elucidate the interplay between the state instability hypothesis and local sleep theory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"484 ","pages":"Article 115513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825000993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleep deprivation, both daily and occupational, has become a prevalent issue in modern society, significantly affecting individuals' attention functions. Traditionally, attention was viewed as a singular, unified system, but advances in neuroscience have revealed it as a network involving coordinated interactions across multiple brain regions. Posner and Petersen’s Attention Network Theory delineates three distinct subcomponents — alerting, orienting, and executive control — based on anatomical localization and neurobiochemical mechanisms. However, most studies on sleep deprivation often overlook these subcomponents, treating attention as a generalized process. This paper aims to address this gap by investigating the effects of total sleep deprivation (TSD) on these attentional subcomponents and their potential neural mechanisms focusing on both the general healthy population and specific occupational groups. Using the Attention Network Test (ANT) paradigm and its variants, the findings reveal that TSD differentially affects the three subcomponents of attentional networks, with occupation-specific differences. Notably, the impact of TSD on executive control exhibits greater variability. The state instability hypothesis and local sleep theory are proposed to explain these neural mechanisms, suggesting that TSD disrupts attentional networks through an interplay of top-down state instability and bottom-up local sleep processes. Future research should refine experimental paradigms related to attentional networks, integrate cognitive neuroscience methodologies and computational modeling approaches, and expand investigations into sleep restriction. Such advancements will provide a more comprehensive understanding of how TSD affects attentional networks and further elucidate the interplay between the state instability hypothesis and local sleep theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完全剥夺睡眠对注意力网络的影响及其神经机制:基于注意力网络测试
睡眠剥夺,无论是日常的还是职业性的,已经成为现代社会普遍存在的问题,严重影响了个人的注意力功能。传统上,注意力被视为一个单一的、统一的系统,但神经科学的进步揭示了它是一个涉及多个大脑区域协调相互作用的网络。波斯纳和彼得森的注意网络理论基于解剖定位和神经生化机制描述了三个不同的子组件——警报、定向和执行控制。然而,大多数关于睡眠剥夺的研究往往忽略了这些子成分,将注意力视为一个广义的过程。本文旨在通过研究完全睡眠剥夺(TSD)对这些注意子成分的影响及其潜在的神经机制来解决这一空白,重点关注一般健康人群和特定职业群体。运用注意网络测试(ANT)范式及其变体,研究结果表明,ptsd对注意网络的三个子成分的影响存在差异,且存在职业特异性差异。值得注意的是,ptsd对执行控制的影响表现出更大的可变性。本文提出状态不稳定假说和局部睡眠理论来解释这些神经机制,认为创伤后应激障碍通过自上而下的状态不稳定和自下而上的局部睡眠过程的相互作用来破坏注意网络。未来的研究应完善与注意网络相关的实验范式,整合认知神经科学方法和计算建模方法,并扩大对睡眠限制的研究。这些进展将提供对创伤后应激障碍如何影响注意网络的更全面的理解,并进一步阐明状态不稳定假说和局部睡眠理论之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
期刊最新文献
Valproate-induced hormonal and histological alterations in PTZ-kindled female rats with a focus on 5HT1A receptors. Bridging nephrology and neurosciences: Insights from the kidney-brain axis. The emerging neuromodulatory role of Homovanillic acid in the medial prefrontal cortex: Implications for anxiety. Resilient hubs, shifting links: The brain's network architecture during deceptive behavior. Beak wiping stereotypies are correlated with neophobia and lack of enrichment in captive house sparrows (Passer domesticus).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1