Physiotherapy of the Trunk Related to Sitting Function After Stroke: A Delphi Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1177/02692155251322263
Elizabeth Bell, Kathy Briffa, James McLoughlin, Robyn Fary
{"title":"Physiotherapy of the Trunk Related to Sitting Function After Stroke: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Elizabeth Bell, Kathy Briffa, James McLoughlin, Robyn Fary","doi":"10.1177/02692155251322263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop consensus statements from a Delphi panel about physiotherapy of the trunk related to sitting function for people with subacute stroke, with the express aim of facilitating treatment choices by novice physiotherapists.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A four-round e-Delphi study using free-text responses and 5-point Likert scales for agreement.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-six panel members with expertise in clinical and/or research in neurological rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Round 1 consisted of 5 free-text questions. Subsequent rounds ascertained agreement and consensus on statements formulated from Round 1 responses. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement. Round 3 presented an additional two clinical observation queries related to the statements for comment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants completed all four rounds. Nineteen of 26 participants (73%) thought physiotherapy of the trunk was important through all stages of recovery after stroke. Different interpretations about what constitutes physiotherapy of the trunk following stroke were identified. Fourteen statements of agreement regarding physiotherapy of the trunk were formulated. The majority of statements involved different activities in sitting such as control of movement over the base of support and reaching with the unaffected arm. In addition to the statements of agreement clinical observations for implementation of the statements were developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the absence of detail in clinical guidelines and a wide range of interventions in systematic reviews, this study provides clear and specific options for novice physiotherapists of treatment of the trunk related to functional task practice in sitting and as preparation for sit to stand.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251322263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251322263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop consensus statements from a Delphi panel about physiotherapy of the trunk related to sitting function for people with subacute stroke, with the express aim of facilitating treatment choices by novice physiotherapists.

Design: A four-round e-Delphi study using free-text responses and 5-point Likert scales for agreement.

Participants: Twenty-six panel members with expertise in clinical and/or research in neurological rehabilitation.

Main measures: Round 1 consisted of 5 free-text questions. Subsequent rounds ascertained agreement and consensus on statements formulated from Round 1 responses. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement. Round 3 presented an additional two clinical observation queries related to the statements for comment.

Results: Twenty participants completed all four rounds. Nineteen of 26 participants (73%) thought physiotherapy of the trunk was important through all stages of recovery after stroke. Different interpretations about what constitutes physiotherapy of the trunk following stroke were identified. Fourteen statements of agreement regarding physiotherapy of the trunk were formulated. The majority of statements involved different activities in sitting such as control of movement over the base of support and reaching with the unaffected arm. In addition to the statements of agreement clinical observations for implementation of the statements were developed.

Conclusions: In the absence of detail in clinical guidelines and a wide range of interventions in systematic reviews, this study provides clear and specific options for novice physiotherapists of treatment of the trunk related to functional task practice in sitting and as preparation for sit to stand.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Patients' and staffs' experiences of clinical support after a lower limb reconstruction: An interview study. Physiotherapy of the Trunk Related to Sitting Function After Stroke: A Delphi Study. The Oxford Visual Perception Screen: Development and normative data of a standardised assessment for visual perception difficulties. An economic evaluation of pre-discharge home assessment visits following hip fracture: Analysis from a randomised controlled trial. Letter to the editor: In radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, energy matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1