Prognostic significance of systemic immune inflammation index for ovarian cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Journal of Ovarian Research Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1186/s13048-025-01626-1
Boliang Chu, Yingying Chen, Jiewei Pan
{"title":"Prognostic significance of systemic immune inflammation index for ovarian cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Boliang Chu, Yingying Chen, Jiewei Pan","doi":"10.1186/s13048-025-01626-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several inflammatory indices have been used to assess the prognosis of ovarian cancer, with variable results. This review assessed whether the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) can predict outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched by the two reviewers from inception to 15th October 2024 for studies assessing the relationship between SII and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies with eleven cohorts were included. Pooled analysis showed that higher SII was a significant predictor of poor OS (HR: 2.35 95% CI: 1.56, 3.55 I<sup>2</sup> = 88%) and worse DFS (HR: 2.51 95% CI: 1.71, 3.67 I<sup>2</sup> = 80%) after ovarian cancer. Sensitivity analysis failed to change the significance of the results. No publication bias was noted. Most results remained significant on subgroup analyses based on location, sample size, FIGO stage, treatment, adjusted outcomes, cut-off of SII, method of determining cut-off, and quality score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SII can be a potential predictor of OS and DFS after ovarian cancer. Further studies are required to improve the evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ovarian Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ovarian Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-025-01626-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Several inflammatory indices have been used to assess the prognosis of ovarian cancer, with variable results. This review assessed whether the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) can predict outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer.

Methods: Embase, PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched by the two reviewers from inception to 15th October 2024 for studies assessing the relationship between SII and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS).

Results: Ten studies with eleven cohorts were included. Pooled analysis showed that higher SII was a significant predictor of poor OS (HR: 2.35 95% CI: 1.56, 3.55 I2 = 88%) and worse DFS (HR: 2.51 95% CI: 1.71, 3.67 I2 = 80%) after ovarian cancer. Sensitivity analysis failed to change the significance of the results. No publication bias was noted. Most results remained significant on subgroup analyses based on location, sample size, FIGO stage, treatment, adjusted outcomes, cut-off of SII, method of determining cut-off, and quality score.

Conclusions: SII can be a potential predictor of OS and DFS after ovarian cancer. Further studies are required to improve the evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统性免疫炎症指数对卵巢癌的预后意义:一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:几种炎症指标被用来评估卵巢癌的预后,结果不一。本综述评估了系统性免疫炎症指数(SII)是否可以预测卵巢癌患者的预后。方法:两位审稿人检索了Embase、PubMed、CENTRAL、Web of Science和Scopus数据库,从成立到2024年10月15日,检索了评估SII与总生存期(OS)或无病生存期(DFS)之间关系的研究。结果:纳入了10项研究,共11个队列。合并分析显示,较高的SII是卵巢癌后较差的OS (HR: 2.35 95% CI: 1.56, 3.55 I2 = 88%)和较差的DFS (HR: 2.51 95% CI: 1.71, 3.67 I2 = 80%)的显著预测因子。敏感性分析不能改变结果的显著性。未发现发表偏倚。大多数结果在基于地点、样本量、FIGO分期、治疗、调整结局、SII截断值、确定截断值的方法和质量评分的亚组分析中仍然具有显著性。结论:SII可作为卵巢癌术后OS和DFS的潜在预测因子。需要进一步的研究来完善证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ovarian Research
Journal of Ovarian Research REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ovarian Research is an open access, peer reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a forum for high-quality basic and clinical research on ovarian function, abnormalities, and cancer. The journal focuses on research that provides new insights into ovarian functions as well as prevention and treatment of diseases afflicting the organ. Topical areas include, but are not restricted to: Ovary development, hormone secretion and regulation Follicle growth and ovulation Infertility and Polycystic ovarian syndrome Regulation of pituitary and other biological functions by ovarian hormones Ovarian cancer, its prevention, diagnosis and treatment Drug development and screening Role of stem cells in ovary development and function.
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle factors for polycystic ovary syndrome: a case-control study. Upregulation of mitoNEET disrupts granulosa cell proliferation, apoptosis and mitochondrial homeostasis : a possible pathogenesis of follicular dysplasia in PCOS. Integrative bioinformatics, single-cell and experimental evidence for a BPA-m6A-apoptosis axis in granulosa cell dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome. Correction: A prospective cohort study on progestin-primed ovarian stimulation vs. GnRH antagonist in IVF-ICSI cycles: effects on clinical pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Unveiling the role of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in follicular development and non-malignant ovarian dysfunction: a comprehensive review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1