Efficacy of ultrasound-guided piriformis muscle corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with piriformis syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2025.01.020
Yu-Shan Fu, Kao-Shang Shih, Yu-Ting Lin, Lin-Fen Hsieh, Ya-Fang Liu, Yann-Rong Chen
{"title":"Efficacy of ultrasound-guided piriformis muscle corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with piriformis syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yu-Shan Fu, Kao-Shang Shih, Yu-Ting Lin, Lin-Fen Hsieh, Ya-Fang Liu, Yann-Rong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.01.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Piriformis syndrome (PS) is a condition that causes low back pain. Ultrasound-guided injection (USI) has become a popular option for diagnostic block and treatment. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is widely used for treating musculoskeletal diseases. However, few studies have compared the therapeutic efficacy of local steroid injections and ESWT.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the therapeutic efficacy of local corticosteroid injections and ESWT against PS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 70 patients, who were randomly divided into two groups: the ESWT and USI groups. The ESWT group was subjected to one session of ESWT, and the USI group received one USI. Patients in both groups performed home-based stretching exercises. Evaluations were conducted at baseline and 1 and 5 weeks after the intervention. The outcomes included the patients' pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), hip range of motion, side effects, and self-evaluation data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The groups did not vary significantly in terms of demographics. Significant time effects were observed in both groups, indicating post-treatment improvements. Furthermore, significant group effects were discovered in ODI and VAS pain scores. However, determining the superiority of one treatment over the other was challenging because of significant pretreatment differences between the groups in terms of ODI and VAS pain scores. However, no significant between-group difference was noted in the improvement rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESWT and USI appear to be effective in the treatment of PS. The levels of efficacy of the two treatment approaches may be similar.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>NCT04684537.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"391-397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.01.020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Piriformis syndrome (PS) is a condition that causes low back pain. Ultrasound-guided injection (USI) has become a popular option for diagnostic block and treatment. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is widely used for treating musculoskeletal diseases. However, few studies have compared the therapeutic efficacy of local steroid injections and ESWT.

Objectives: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of local corticosteroid injections and ESWT against PS.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 70 patients, who were randomly divided into two groups: the ESWT and USI groups. The ESWT group was subjected to one session of ESWT, and the USI group received one USI. Patients in both groups performed home-based stretching exercises. Evaluations were conducted at baseline and 1 and 5 weeks after the intervention. The outcomes included the patients' pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), hip range of motion, side effects, and self-evaluation data.

Results: The groups did not vary significantly in terms of demographics. Significant time effects were observed in both groups, indicating post-treatment improvements. Furthermore, significant group effects were discovered in ODI and VAS pain scores. However, determining the superiority of one treatment over the other was challenging because of significant pretreatment differences between the groups in terms of ODI and VAS pain scores. However, no significant between-group difference was noted in the improvement rate.

Conclusion: ESWT and USI appear to be effective in the treatment of PS. The levels of efficacy of the two treatment approaches may be similar.

Clinical trial registration number: NCT04684537.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声波引导下梨状肌皮质类固醇注射与体外冲击波疗法对梨状肌综合征患者的疗效对比:随机对照试验。
背景:梨状肌综合征(PS)是一种引起腰痛的疾病。超声引导注射(USI)已成为诊断阻断和治疗的流行选择。体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)广泛应用于肌肉骨骼疾病的治疗。然而,很少有研究比较局部类固醇注射和ESWT的治疗效果。目的:比较局部皮质类固醇注射与ESWT治疗多发性硬化症的疗效。方法:本前瞻性随机对照试验纳入70例患者,随机分为ESWT组和USI组。ESWT组接受1次ESWT, USI组接受1次USI。两组患者都进行了基于家庭的伸展运动。在基线和干预后1周和5周进行评估。结果包括患者的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、髋关节活动范围、副作用和自我评价数据。结果:两组在人口统计学上没有显著差异。两组均观察到显著的时间效应,表明治疗后改善。此外,在ODI和VAS疼痛评分中发现了显著的组效应。然而,确定一种治疗优于另一种治疗是具有挑战性的,因为在ODI和VAS疼痛评分方面,两组之间的预处理存在显著差异。然而,两组间的改善率无显著差异。结论:ESWT和USI治疗PS似乎有效,两种治疗方法的疗效水平可能相似。临床试验注册号:NCT04684537。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Identification of the molecular characterization and tumor microenvironment of thoracic inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Small airways dysfunction in severe asthma: Current treatment approaches and future directions. High-normal and abnormal alanine transaminase levels linked to increased risk of hepatoma following treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Dexmedetomidine infusion on blood loss in orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study on its efficacy. Pioneering study in the role of Ribonuclease L in the development of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1