Usefulness and Safety of Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage for Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pancreas Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1097/MPA.0000000000002484
Takashi Ito, Tsukasa Ikeura, Koh Nakamaru, Masataka Masuda, Shinji Nakayama, Masaaki Shimatani, Kazushige Uchida, Makoto Takaoka, Kazuichi Okazaki, Makoto Naganuma
{"title":"Usefulness and Safety of Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage for Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis.","authors":"Takashi Ito, Tsukasa Ikeura, Koh Nakamaru, Masataka Masuda, Shinji Nakayama, Masaaki Shimatani, Kazushige Uchida, Makoto Takaoka, Kazuichi Okazaki, Makoto Naganuma","doi":"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related disease which is complicated by extra-pancreatic lesions such as IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. The appropriate biliary drainage method and period for type 1 AIP remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the usefulness and safety of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) for type 1 AIP in patients with jaundice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 83 patients with type 1 AIP who underwent steroid therapy who underwent evaluation of contrast material outflow to the jejunum using cholangiography. The ENBD was removed when the contrast material outflowed into the duodenum; an endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) was performed if it did not outflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cholangiography and pancreatography were achieved in 83 (100%) and 77 (93%) patients, respectively. Liver function parameters were significantly decreased after ENBD. Bile juice cytology using ENBD revealed no evidence of malignancy. Two (2%) patients developed mild pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy was performed in 56 (67%) patients. ENBD was removed in 75 (90%) patients; EBS was performed in 8 (10%). Multivariate regression analysis showed pancreatic focal enlargement (OR=12.06, 95% CI: 1.28-113.62, P=0.03) as an independent risk factor for EBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although ENBD causes discomfort and the risk of self-removal, it differentiates AIP from malignant tumors, evaluates steroid effects using real-time cholangiography, and reduces the number of required ERCP procedures. ENBD could be one of the drainage options for type 1 AIP, depending on patients' background.</p>","PeriodicalId":19733,"journal":{"name":"Pancreas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related disease which is complicated by extra-pancreatic lesions such as IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. The appropriate biliary drainage method and period for type 1 AIP remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the usefulness and safety of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) for type 1 AIP in patients with jaundice.

Methods: This study enrolled 83 patients with type 1 AIP who underwent steroid therapy who underwent evaluation of contrast material outflow to the jejunum using cholangiography. The ENBD was removed when the contrast material outflowed into the duodenum; an endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) was performed if it did not outflow.

Results: Cholangiography and pancreatography were achieved in 83 (100%) and 77 (93%) patients, respectively. Liver function parameters were significantly decreased after ENBD. Bile juice cytology using ENBD revealed no evidence of malignancy. Two (2%) patients developed mild pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy was performed in 56 (67%) patients. ENBD was removed in 75 (90%) patients; EBS was performed in 8 (10%). Multivariate regression analysis showed pancreatic focal enlargement (OR=12.06, 95% CI: 1.28-113.62, P=0.03) as an independent risk factor for EBS.

Conclusions: Although ENBD causes discomfort and the risk of self-removal, it differentiates AIP from malignant tumors, evaluates steroid effects using real-time cholangiography, and reduces the number of required ERCP procedures. ENBD could be one of the drainage options for type 1 AIP, depending on patients' background.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreas
Pancreas 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
289
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Pancreas provides a central forum for communication of original works involving both basic and clinical research on the exocrine and endocrine pancreas and their interrelationships and consequences in disease states. This multidisciplinary, international journal covers the whole spectrum of basic sciences, etiology, prevention, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and surgical and medical management of pancreatic diseases, including cancer.
期刊最新文献
Coupled Plasma Filtration and Adsorption in Eliminating Inflammatory Mediators and Enhancing Sublingual Microcirculation in Severe Acute Pancreatitis. Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Might be Limited to Biologically Borderline Resectable Cases. Usefulness and Safety of Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage for Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis. Enhancing Pancreatic Cancer Therapy With Targeted CD133-Exosome Delivery of PD-L1 siRNA: A Preclinical Investigation. Evaluating Continuous Glucose Monitoring After Total Pancreatectomy With or Without Islet Autotransplantation: A Scoping Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1