Time to Bystander CPR and Survival for Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110566
Evan L O'Keefe, Mohammad Abdel Jawad, Kevin F Kennedy, Dan Nguyen, Nobuhiro Ikemura, Paul Chan
{"title":"Time to Bystander CPR and Survival for Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.","authors":"Evan L O'Keefe, Mohammad Abdel Jawad, Kevin F Kennedy, Dan Nguyen, Nobuhiro Ikemura, Paul Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with higher survival. The association between time to bystander CPR at different time thresholds, compared with those with no bystander CPR, is less clear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival, we identified 194,807 witnessed OHCAs during 2013-2023. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between each time interval for initiation of bystander CPR (0-1, 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, 10+ minutes), compared with no bystander CPR, for survival to discharge and favorable neurological survival (i.e. without severe neurological deficits).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 64.4±15.9 years, and 33.8% were female. Bystander CPR was provided in 48.4% of cases, with a median initiation time of 2 minutes (IQR: 1-5). Overall, 15.3% survived to discharge, and 12.9% had favorable neurological survival. Compared with no bystander CPR, survival to discharge was higher for patients with bystander CPR initiated at 0-1 minutes (OR 1.78 [95% CI: 1.73-1.84]), 2-3 minutes (OR 1.57 [1.51-1.64]), 4-5 minutes (OR 1.23 [1.17-1.30]), 6-7 minutes (OR 1.25 [1.15-1.35]), and 8-9 minutes (OR 1.13 [1.03-1.25]), but no survival association was seen at ≥10 minutes (OR 0.80 [0.74-0.86]). A similar pattern was observed for neurological survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with no bystander CPR, bystander CPR was associated with improved survival even when started at 8 to 9 minutes. Given that there is a graded, inverse relationship between time to bystander CPR and survival, these findings underscore the urgency of immediate bystander CPR initiation to optimize OHCA survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110566"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110566","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with higher survival. The association between time to bystander CPR at different time thresholds, compared with those with no bystander CPR, is less clear.

Methods: Within the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival, we identified 194,807 witnessed OHCAs during 2013-2023. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between each time interval for initiation of bystander CPR (0-1, 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, 10+ minutes), compared with no bystander CPR, for survival to discharge and favorable neurological survival (i.e. without severe neurological deficits).

Results: The mean age was 64.4±15.9 years, and 33.8% were female. Bystander CPR was provided in 48.4% of cases, with a median initiation time of 2 minutes (IQR: 1-5). Overall, 15.3% survived to discharge, and 12.9% had favorable neurological survival. Compared with no bystander CPR, survival to discharge was higher for patients with bystander CPR initiated at 0-1 minutes (OR 1.78 [95% CI: 1.73-1.84]), 2-3 minutes (OR 1.57 [1.51-1.64]), 4-5 minutes (OR 1.23 [1.17-1.30]), 6-7 minutes (OR 1.25 [1.15-1.35]), and 8-9 minutes (OR 1.13 [1.03-1.25]), but no survival association was seen at ≥10 minutes (OR 0.80 [0.74-0.86]). A similar pattern was observed for neurological survival.

Conclusions: Compared with no bystander CPR, bystander CPR was associated with improved survival even when started at 8 to 9 minutes. Given that there is a graded, inverse relationship between time to bystander CPR and survival, these findings underscore the urgency of immediate bystander CPR initiation to optimize OHCA survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “The “invisible ceiling” of bystander CPR in three Asian countries: Descriptive study of national OHCA registry” [Resuscitation 206 (2025) 110445] Semi-autonomous drone delivering automated external defibrillators for real out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A Danish feasibility study Use of machine learning models to identify National Institutes of Health-funded cardiac arrest research Amiodarone vs lidocaine in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, is there a clear winner? Reply to “Revisiting priorities in resuscitative hysterotomy”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1