Time to bystander CPR and survival for witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110566
Evan L. O’Keefe , Mohammad Abdel Jawad , Kevin F. Kennedy , Dan Nguyen , Nobuhiro Ikemura , Paul S. Chan
{"title":"Time to bystander CPR and survival for witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest","authors":"Evan L. O’Keefe ,&nbsp;Mohammad Abdel Jawad ,&nbsp;Kevin F. Kennedy ,&nbsp;Dan Nguyen ,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Ikemura ,&nbsp;Paul S. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with higher survival. The association between time to bystander CPR at different time thresholds, compared with those with no bystander CPR, is less clear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Within the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival, we identified 194,807 witnessed OHCAs during 2013–2023. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between each time interval for initiation of bystander CPR (0–1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–7, 8–9, 10 + minutes), compared with no bystander CPR, for survival to discharge and favorable neurological survival (i.e. without severe neurological deficits).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age was 64.4 ± 15.9 years, and 33.8% were female. Bystander CPR was provided in 48.4% of cases, with a median initiation time of 2 min (IQR: 1–5). Overall, 15.3% survived to discharge, and 12.9% had favorable neurological survival. Compared with no bystander CPR, survival to discharge was higher for patients with bystander CPR initiated at 0–1 min (OR 1.78 [95% CI: 1.73–1.84]), 2–3 min (OR 1.57 [1.51–1.64]), 4–5 min (OR 1.23 [1.17–1.30]), 6–7 min (OR 1.25 [1.15–1.35]), and 8–9 min (OR 1.13 [1.03–1.25]), but no survival association was seen at ≥ 10 min (OR 0.80 [0.74–0.86]). A similar pattern was observed for neurological survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with no bystander CPR, bystander CPR was associated with improved survival even when started at 8 to 9 min. Given that there is a graded, inverse relationship between time to bystander CPR and survival, these findings underscore the urgency of immediate bystander CPR initiation to optimize OHCA survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 110566"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957225000784","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with higher survival. The association between time to bystander CPR at different time thresholds, compared with those with no bystander CPR, is less clear.

Methods

Within the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival, we identified 194,807 witnessed OHCAs during 2013–2023. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between each time interval for initiation of bystander CPR (0–1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–7, 8–9, 10 + minutes), compared with no bystander CPR, for survival to discharge and favorable neurological survival (i.e. without severe neurological deficits).

Results

The mean age was 64.4 ± 15.9 years, and 33.8% were female. Bystander CPR was provided in 48.4% of cases, with a median initiation time of 2 min (IQR: 1–5). Overall, 15.3% survived to discharge, and 12.9% had favorable neurological survival. Compared with no bystander CPR, survival to discharge was higher for patients with bystander CPR initiated at 0–1 min (OR 1.78 [95% CI: 1.73–1.84]), 2–3 min (OR 1.57 [1.51–1.64]), 4–5 min (OR 1.23 [1.17–1.30]), 6–7 min (OR 1.25 [1.15–1.35]), and 8–9 min (OR 1.13 [1.03–1.25]), but no survival association was seen at ≥ 10 min (OR 0.80 [0.74–0.86]). A similar pattern was observed for neurological survival.

Conclusions

Compared with no bystander CPR, bystander CPR was associated with improved survival even when started at 8 to 9 min. Given that there is a graded, inverse relationship between time to bystander CPR and survival, these findings underscore the urgency of immediate bystander CPR initiation to optimize OHCA survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旁观者心肺复苏术的时间和院外心脏骤停的存活率。
背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的心肺复苏(CPR)与更高的生存率相关。在不同的时间阈值下,与没有进行旁观者心肺复苏术的人相比,到旁观者心肺复苏术的时间之间的关系不太清楚。方法:在心脏骤停登记处以提高生存率,我们确定了2013-2023年期间发生的194,807例ohca。采用多变量分层逻辑回归来评估与无旁观者CPR相比,开始旁观者CPR的每个时间间隔(0-1、2-3、4-5、6-7、8-9、10+分钟)与出院存活率和良好的神经系统存活率(即无严重神经功能缺损)之间的关系。结果:平均年龄64.4±15.9岁,女性占33.8%。48.4%的病例提供了旁观者CPR,起始时间中位数为2分钟(IQR: 1-5)。总体而言,15.3%的患者存活至出院,12.9%的患者神经系统存活良好。与无旁观者CPR相比,在0-1分钟、2-3分钟(OR 1.78 [95% CI: 1.73-1.84])、2-3分钟(OR 1.57[1.51-1.64])、4-5分钟(OR 1.23[1.17-1.30])、6-7分钟(OR 1.25[1.15-1.35])和8-9分钟(OR 1.13[1.03-1.25])开始进行旁观者CPR的患者到出院的生存率更高,但在≥10分钟(OR 0.80[0.74-0.86])时未见生存率相关。在神经存活方面也观察到类似的模式。结论:与无旁观者心肺复苏术相比,旁观者心肺复苏术即使在8 - 9分钟开始也能提高生存率。鉴于旁观者心肺复苏术的时间与生存率呈分级反比关系,这些研究结果强调了立即开始旁观者心肺复苏术以优化OHCA生存率的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Signal and Meaning After Cardiac Arrest. DNAR-labelled OHCA: when a label meets reality-and why registries should catch up. Proteomics: the missing link in cardiac arrest prediction? Intraosseous and intravenous vascular access during adult cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Duration of emergency medical services-initiated prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts and survival for pediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1