Occupational Therapy Assessment Practice Patterns for Core Domains in Adult Populations.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1177/15394492251320089
Pamela Roberts, Debra Ouellette, Gordon Muir Giles, Tracy M Mroz, Jeremy Furniss, Julie Malloy, Trudy Mallinson
{"title":"Occupational Therapy Assessment Practice Patterns for Core Domains in Adult Populations.","authors":"Pamela Roberts, Debra Ouellette, Gordon Muir Giles, Tracy M Mroz, Jeremy Furniss, Julie Malloy, Trudy Mallinson","doi":"10.1177/15394492251320089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Practitioners need to demonstrate the value of occupational therapy services in achieving effective patient outcomes. To intervene effectively, we must have adequate assessment practices. This study examines variation in occupational therapy assessment practices by facility type, areas addressed, and types of instruments. The study characterizes commonly and frequently used assessment practices in core occupational domains and identifies potential practice gaps related to assessment. A cross-sectional online survey across six domains central to adult occupational therapy practice (activities of daily living [ADL], instrumental activities of daily living [IADL], fear of falling, functional cognition, psychosocial, and vision) was administered to practitioners in various settings. Surveys were obtained from 1,198 respondent. Survey responses identified differences in domains being assessed and assessment methods used by occupational therapy practitioners across hospital inpatient post-acute care facilities and community settings. There is variability in the methods used to assess domains critical to occupational therapy practice and the degree to which occupational therapists evaluate domains in practice settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":" ","pages":"108-118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492251320089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practitioners need to demonstrate the value of occupational therapy services in achieving effective patient outcomes. To intervene effectively, we must have adequate assessment practices. This study examines variation in occupational therapy assessment practices by facility type, areas addressed, and types of instruments. The study characterizes commonly and frequently used assessment practices in core occupational domains and identifies potential practice gaps related to assessment. A cross-sectional online survey across six domains central to adult occupational therapy practice (activities of daily living [ADL], instrumental activities of daily living [IADL], fear of falling, functional cognition, psychosocial, and vision) was administered to practitioners in various settings. Surveys were obtained from 1,198 respondent. Survey responses identified differences in domains being assessed and assessment methods used by occupational therapy practitioners across hospital inpatient post-acute care facilities and community settings. There is variability in the methods used to assess domains critical to occupational therapy practice and the degree to which occupational therapists evaluate domains in practice settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人核心领域的职业治疗评估实践模式。
从业人员需要证明职业治疗服务在实现有效的患者结果方面的价值。为了有效地干预,我们必须有足够的评估方法。本研究考察了职业治疗评估实践在设施类型、处理区域和工具类型方面的差异。该研究描述了核心职业领域中常用和频繁使用的评估实践,并确定了与评估相关的潜在实践差距。一项横断面在线调查涉及成人职业治疗实践的六个核心领域(日常生活活动[ADL],日常生活工具活动[IADL],跌倒恐惧,功能认知,社会心理和视力),对不同环境的从业者进行了管理。调查来自1198名受访者。调查结果表明,在医院住院病人急性后护理设施和社区环境中,职业治疗从业人员所评估的领域和评估方法存在差异。评估对职业治疗实践至关重要的领域的方法和职业治疗师在实践环境中评估领域的程度存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
期刊最新文献
From Makerspaces to Practice: 3D Printing Expansion to Improve Assistive Technology Access. Perceived Accessibility of Living Environment and Services Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability. Systematic Review of Group-Based Emotion Regulation Interventions for Autistic Children's Socio-Emotional Competence. Social and Environmental Determinants of Occupation: Population-Level Analysis of Adolescent Mental Health. Validation of IPA and SEPECSA in Italian Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Psychometric Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1