Relationship of perinatal outcomes to the competence and quantity of contact with community health workers.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.04094
Mark Tomlinson, Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus, Linnea Stansert Katzen, William Gertsch, Ingrid le Roux, Elaine Dippenaar, Karl le Roux
{"title":"Relationship of perinatal outcomes to the competence and quantity of contact with community health workers.","authors":"Mark Tomlinson, Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus, Linnea Stansert Katzen, William Gertsch, Ingrid le Roux, Elaine Dippenaar, Karl le Roux","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of perinatal home visits by community health workers (CHWs) often diminishes when large regional or national programmes are implemented. To address this gap, we aimed to identify which CHW behaviours influence maternal and child outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomised all government-funded CHWs at eight deeply rural clinics (n = 43) by clinic to usual care, which consisted of home visits (control group; four clinics, 23 CHWs, 392 mothers), or to home visiting, which included improved monitoring and supervision (intervention group; four clinics, 20 CHWs, 423 mothers). Since fewer than 7% of CHWs in the control group ever implemented home visits and no data was available on the frequency of visits, we focussed on the CHWs in the intervention group. We monitored the number and timing of home visits over time and documented it by paper and mobile phone records. Supervisors who conducted at-home observations of visits completed competency ratings on each CHW. We evaluated the associations between the competency of the CHW and the number and timing of CHWs' visits with 13 maternal/child outcomes using multiple regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent home visits by CHWs reached the threshold at about 9-12 months, with the frequency reducing because of COVID-19. There were two significant outcomes (antiretroviral therapy adherence and securing the child grant) associated with the number of home visits in the intervention group, but insufficient to demonstrate efficacy. The CHW competency was unrelated to any maternal/child outcome. Moreover, CHWs visited 7% of mothers during the first two days of their infants' lives, 26% during the first week, 57% within the first month, and 90% by the first three months of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current standards for training and monitoring of paraprofessional home visitors are highly unrealistic. Substantial and ongoing investments are needed for visits to occur consistently over time. However, hiring and selection criteria are likely as important as training and monitoring. CHW programmes must be embedded in organisational contexts that are well functioning and have management and support structures that are operational to ensure their success.Keywords.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04094"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of perinatal home visits by community health workers (CHWs) often diminishes when large regional or national programmes are implemented. To address this gap, we aimed to identify which CHW behaviours influence maternal and child outcomes.

Methods: We randomised all government-funded CHWs at eight deeply rural clinics (n = 43) by clinic to usual care, which consisted of home visits (control group; four clinics, 23 CHWs, 392 mothers), or to home visiting, which included improved monitoring and supervision (intervention group; four clinics, 20 CHWs, 423 mothers). Since fewer than 7% of CHWs in the control group ever implemented home visits and no data was available on the frequency of visits, we focussed on the CHWs in the intervention group. We monitored the number and timing of home visits over time and documented it by paper and mobile phone records. Supervisors who conducted at-home observations of visits completed competency ratings on each CHW. We evaluated the associations between the competency of the CHW and the number and timing of CHWs' visits with 13 maternal/child outcomes using multiple regression analyses.

Results: Consistent home visits by CHWs reached the threshold at about 9-12 months, with the frequency reducing because of COVID-19. There were two significant outcomes (antiretroviral therapy adherence and securing the child grant) associated with the number of home visits in the intervention group, but insufficient to demonstrate efficacy. The CHW competency was unrelated to any maternal/child outcome. Moreover, CHWs visited 7% of mothers during the first two days of their infants' lives, 26% during the first week, 57% within the first month, and 90% by the first three months of life.

Conclusions: Current standards for training and monitoring of paraprofessional home visitors are highly unrealistic. Substantial and ongoing investments are needed for visits to occur consistently over time. However, hiring and selection criteria are likely as important as training and monitoring. CHW programmes must be embedded in organisational contexts that are well functioning and have management and support structures that are operational to ensure their success.Keywords.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期结局与与社区卫生工作者接触的能力和数量的关系。
背景:在实施大型地区性或全国性计划时,社区保健员(CHWs)进行围产期家访的效果往往会降低。为了弥补这一不足,我们旨在确定哪些社区保健员行为会影响母婴结局:我们将八个深入农村的诊所(n = 43)中所有由政府资助的社区保健员按诊所随机分为常规护理组(对照组;四个诊所,23 名社区保健员,392 名母亲)和家访组(干预组;四个诊所,20 名社区保健员,423 名母亲)。由于对照组中只有不到 7% 的保健社工进行过家访,而且没有关于家访频率的数据,因此我们将重点放在了干预组中的保健社工身上。我们对家访的次数和时间进行了长期监测,并通过纸质和手机记录进行了记录。对家访进行观察的督导人员完成了对每位社区保健工作者的能力评级。我们使用多元回归分析评估了保健工作者的能力、保健工作者家访的次数和时间与 13 项母婴结果之间的关联:社区保健员的持续家访在大约 9-12 个月时达到临界值,由于 COVID-19 的存在,家访频率有所降低。在干预组中,有两项重要结果(坚持抗逆转录病毒治疗和获得儿童补助金)与家访次数相关,但不足以证明其有效性。社区保健员的能力与任何母婴结果都无关。此外,7%的母亲在婴儿出生后的头两天接受了社区保健员的家访,26%的母亲在婴儿出生后的第一周接受了家访,57%的母亲在婴儿出生后的第一个月接受了家访,90%的母亲在婴儿出生后的前三个月接受了家访:结论:目前对准专业家庭访视者的培训和监督标准非常不现实。要想长期持续地进行家访,就需要进行大量的持续投资。然而,聘用和遴选标准可能与培训和监督同样重要。儿童保健工作者计划必须植根于运作良好的组织环境中,并拥有可运作的管理和支持结构,以确保其成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Economic evaluation, resource utilisation, and associated economic burden of myopia management: a systematic literature review. Prevalence, incidence, and outcome of tuberculosis among young hospitalised children with acute illness in Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia. Current landscape and future directions of policies addressing air quality improvement in Pakistan: a scoping review. Association of parental favouritism in childhood and depression in old age: a longitudinal survey. Neonatal diet and growth outcomes in hospitalised very preterm infants: an observational study in middle income countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1