Lateralization in visualization among neurosurgeons

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neurocirugia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neucir.2024.10.005
Hrvoje Barić , Sara Komljenović , Helena Ljulj
{"title":"Lateralization in visualization among neurosurgeons","authors":"Hrvoje Barić ,&nbsp;Sara Komljenović ,&nbsp;Helena Ljulj","doi":"10.1016/j.neucir.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Handedness is an epiphenomenon of brain lateralization which has been researched in the context of surgical performance, yet the same does not hold true for lateralization at a more fundamental level. We aimed to investigate whether neurosurgeons are biased in visualizing and depicting anatomy and pathology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a two part study consisting of an online survey and image analysis. An online questionnaire was used to collect basic sociodemographic data and prompt subjects to visualize surgical approaches and pathological entities and report on the side of the visualized topics. Prominent neurosurgical literature was screened for depictions of the same entities and approaches and the depicted side was noted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 49 responses, most from Croatia (n = 26), men (n = 38), right-handed (n = 42), of average age 37 years, and with 9 years of neurosurgical experience. Ambidexterity was more prevalent than in the general population. The respondents imagined the right side more commonly in all cranial-related questions, and the left side in spine-related questions. Images in neurosurgical literature showed correspondingly biased laterality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a significant bias among neurosurgeons in laterality in processing topographical information on anatomy and pathology. Research is warranted to investigate the causes and real life implications of this phenomenon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51145,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 93-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130147324001064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Handedness is an epiphenomenon of brain lateralization which has been researched in the context of surgical performance, yet the same does not hold true for lateralization at a more fundamental level. We aimed to investigate whether neurosurgeons are biased in visualizing and depicting anatomy and pathology.

Methods

This was a two part study consisting of an online survey and image analysis. An online questionnaire was used to collect basic sociodemographic data and prompt subjects to visualize surgical approaches and pathological entities and report on the side of the visualized topics. Prominent neurosurgical literature was screened for depictions of the same entities and approaches and the depicted side was noted.

Results

There were 49 responses, most from Croatia (n = 26), men (n = 38), right-handed (n = 42), of average age 37 years, and with 9 years of neurosurgical experience. Ambidexterity was more prevalent than in the general population. The respondents imagined the right side more commonly in all cranial-related questions, and the left side in spine-related questions. Images in neurosurgical literature showed correspondingly biased laterality.

Conclusion

There is a significant bias among neurosurgeons in laterality in processing topographical information on anatomy and pathology. Research is warranted to investigate the causes and real life implications of this phenomenon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经外科医生的视觉偏侧
背景手性是大脑侧向化的一种表象,已在手术表现的背景下对其进行了研究,但在更基本的层面上,侧向化的情况却并非如此。我们的目的是调查神经外科医生在可视化和描述解剖学和病理学时是否存在偏差。方法这是一项由在线调查和图像分析两部分组成的研究。在线调查问卷用于收集基本社会人口学数据,提示受试者将手术方法和病理实体可视化,并报告可视化主题的侧面。结果共有 49 份回复,大部分来自克罗地亚(26 份),男性(38 份),右撇子(42 份),平均年龄 37 岁,有 9 年神经外科经验。与普通人相比,他们的双手更灵活。在所有与颅脑相关的问题中,受访者更常想象右侧,而在与脊柱相关的问题中,受访者更常想象左侧。结论神经外科医生在处理解剖学和病理学地形信息时存在明显的侧向偏差。有必要对这一现象的原因和对现实生活的影响进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocirugia
Neurocirugia 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurocirugía is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (SENEC). It is published every 2 months (6 issues per year). Neurocirugía will consider for publication, original clinical and experimental scientific works associated with neurosurgery and other related neurological sciences. All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). The Journal accepts works written in Spanish or English.
期刊最新文献
¿Existe la enfermedad del disco negro? Embolización por punción directa de tumor fibroso solitario intracraneal con SQUID Influencia de la magnitud y orientación de las fuerzas en la fractura de odontoides: análisis de un modelo de elementos finitos Control mediante imagen después del clipaje de un aneurisma: ¿es suficiente la angiotomografía 3D? Histiocitosis de células de Langerhans con invasión al parénquima cerebral: una entidad rara
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1