Population-based systematic enrolment of individuals ensures high lung cancer screening uptake

Tanel Laisaar , Kadi Kallavus , Anneli Poola , Mari Räppo , Merily Taur , Vahur Makke , Marianna Frik , Pilvi Ilves , Kaja-Triin Laisaar
{"title":"Population-based systematic enrolment of individuals ensures high lung cancer screening uptake","authors":"Tanel Laisaar ,&nbsp;Kadi Kallavus ,&nbsp;Anneli Poola ,&nbsp;Mari Räppo ,&nbsp;Merily Taur ,&nbsp;Vahur Makke ,&nbsp;Marianna Frik ,&nbsp;Pilvi Ilves ,&nbsp;Kaja-Triin Laisaar","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended by international societies, yet it is still debated how to efficiently enrol participants. The aim of this study was to evaluate systematic enrolment of patients through family physicians in a regional LCS pilot study in Estonia.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This study was conducted in one county (with approximately 10 % of the country's population), where all family physicians were approached. In each participating practice, all 55- to 74-year-old individuals were identified and evaluated by the family physician or nurse. Two LCS inclusion criteria were used in parallel – individuals with elevated lung cancer (LC) risk, according to either smoking status (≥20 pack-years; quit &lt;15 years ago) and/or a PLCO<sub>m2012noRace</sub> risk score (&gt;1.5 %/6 years), underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). The scans were evaluated and participants managed according to LungRADS 1.1 protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy-four participating family physician practices had 26 759 patients in the target age group. During the inclusion period 24 413 individuals were evaluated, of whom 17 215 were excluded. Of the remaining 7198 individuals, 3708 had higher LC risk and were referred for LDCT. Of the 3444 individuals who underwent LDCT, 30 were diagnosed with LC. Considering the total LCS target age group, an estimated participation rate of 79.3 % (95 %CI 78.1 %–80.5 %) was achieved.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Population-based systematic enrolment of participants for LCS by family physicians and nurses ensured very high uptake in the target group, providing a valuable reference for planning LCS programs in countries with family physicians on board.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294225000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended by international societies, yet it is still debated how to efficiently enrol participants. The aim of this study was to evaluate systematic enrolment of patients through family physicians in a regional LCS pilot study in Estonia.

Material and methods

This study was conducted in one county (with approximately 10 % of the country's population), where all family physicians were approached. In each participating practice, all 55- to 74-year-old individuals were identified and evaluated by the family physician or nurse. Two LCS inclusion criteria were used in parallel – individuals with elevated lung cancer (LC) risk, according to either smoking status (≥20 pack-years; quit <15 years ago) and/or a PLCOm2012noRace risk score (>1.5 %/6 years), underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). The scans were evaluated and participants managed according to LungRADS 1.1 protocol.

Results

Seventy-four participating family physician practices had 26 759 patients in the target age group. During the inclusion period 24 413 individuals were evaluated, of whom 17 215 were excluded. Of the remaining 7198 individuals, 3708 had higher LC risk and were referred for LDCT. Of the 3444 individuals who underwent LDCT, 30 were diagnosed with LC. Considering the total LCS target age group, an estimated participation rate of 79.3 % (95 %CI 78.1 %–80.5 %) was achieved.

Conclusion

Population-based systematic enrolment of participants for LCS by family physicians and nurses ensured very high uptake in the target group, providing a valuable reference for planning LCS programs in countries with family physicians on board.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人口的系统性个人登记确保肺癌筛查的高接受率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and pathological differences between early- and late-onset colorectal cancer and determinants of one-year all-cause mortality among advanced-stage patients: a retrospective cohort study in Medellín, Colombia A case of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pregnancy with cervical cancer (IB3) Pregnancy-related breast cancer: 14-year experience in a tertiary institution in Hong Kong Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) clone 22C3 expression in resected colorectal cancer as companion diagnostics for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A comparison study and inter-rater agreement evaluation across proposed cut-offs and predictive (TPS, CPS and IC) scores Tumor circulating biomarkers in colorectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1