Towards sustainable future: Assessing the impact of coal phase-down on the sustainable development goals in China

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124713
Zhaohua Wang , Haotian Zhang , Hao Li , Bin Zhang
{"title":"Towards sustainable future: Assessing the impact of coal phase-down on the sustainable development goals in China","authors":"Zhaohua Wang ,&nbsp;Haotian Zhang ,&nbsp;Hao Li ,&nbsp;Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coal phase-down (CPD) is critical for climate mitigation and impacts resource use and environmental emissions, key to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As the world's largest coal consumer and producer, China's decarbonization significantly influences global energy transitions and SDG fulfillment. This study employs an integrated assessment model to evaluate the impacts of CPD on energy systems, resource use, environmental quality, and SDG progress. The analysis is conducted under five scenarios: BAU (Business-As-Usual), Cost-CPD (cost-driven), Tech-CPD (technology-driven), CoalGrowth (coal expansion), and two temperature control pathways (1.5 °C and 2 °C). Our analysis shows that CPD scenarios lead to a more favorable transition in the energy system, enhanced mitigation of environmental emissions, and improved resource efficiency. Results show considerable variation across SDG scores. Notably, SDG7 achieves the most significant improvement, whereas SDG2, SDG6, and SDG15 show limited or even regressive progress. CPD pathways foster synergies among SDG targets, particularly SDG7 and SDG13, with both Tech-CPD and Cost-CPD contributing by improving energy efficiency, and reducing emissions, thereby driving progress on both SDG7 and SDG13.These findings provide valuable insights for shaping CPD policies and promoting sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 124713"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725006899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coal phase-down (CPD) is critical for climate mitigation and impacts resource use and environmental emissions, key to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As the world's largest coal consumer and producer, China's decarbonization significantly influences global energy transitions and SDG fulfillment. This study employs an integrated assessment model to evaluate the impacts of CPD on energy systems, resource use, environmental quality, and SDG progress. The analysis is conducted under five scenarios: BAU (Business-As-Usual), Cost-CPD (cost-driven), Tech-CPD (technology-driven), CoalGrowth (coal expansion), and two temperature control pathways (1.5 °C and 2 °C). Our analysis shows that CPD scenarios lead to a more favorable transition in the energy system, enhanced mitigation of environmental emissions, and improved resource efficiency. Results show considerable variation across SDG scores. Notably, SDG7 achieves the most significant improvement, whereas SDG2, SDG6, and SDG15 show limited or even regressive progress. CPD pathways foster synergies among SDG targets, particularly SDG7 and SDG13, with both Tech-CPD and Cost-CPD contributing by improving energy efficiency, and reducing emissions, thereby driving progress on both SDG7 and SDG13.These findings provide valuable insights for shaping CPD policies and promoting sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Seaweed feed enhance the long-term recovery of bacterial community and carbon-nitrogen sequestration in eutrophic coastal wetland Microbial Fe(III) reduction across a pH gradient: The impacts on secondary mineralization and microbial community development Enhancing textile wastewater reuse: Integrating Fenton oxidation with membrane filtration The impact of noise on green open space value Flood resilience through hybrid deep learning: Advanced forecasting for Taipei's urban drainage system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1