Immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors as first-line treatment in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115329
Guillermo Villacampa , Gemma Eminowicz , Victor Navarro , Lorenzo Carità , David García-Illescas , Ana Oaknin , J. Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo
{"title":"Immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors as first-line treatment in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Guillermo Villacampa ,&nbsp;Gemma Eminowicz ,&nbsp;Victor Navarro ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Carità ,&nbsp;David García-Illescas ,&nbsp;Ana Oaknin ,&nbsp;J. Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Several first-line therapeutic strategies have been evaluated alongside platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (a/rEC). However, the optimal approach remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized control trials (RCTs) that evaluate first-line therapeutic strategies in a/rEC involving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects and an extracted individual patient data meta-analysis were performed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by MMR status, p53 status within the MMRp population and PD-L1 status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 3210 patients with EC were included. In the MMRp population, the combination (ICI and PARPi) showed a not statistically significant PFS benefit compared with each agent alone. In MMRp p53-abnormal patients (n = 590), combining PARPi and ICI statistically improved PFS compared to ICI alone (HR=0.47, 95 %CI 0.40–0.94) with a numerically better outcome compared to PARPi alone (HR=0.63, 95 %CI 0.26–1.57). No benefit from PARPi was observed in the p53 wild-type MMRp population. PD-L1-positivity (n = 1121) appears to predict more benefit from the addition of ICI and PARPi, with a larger benefit of combination therapy. In the MMRd population (n = 769), the best outcomes were observed with ICI alone, with no additional benefit of PARPi. Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events were seen in 75.1 % patients treated with the combination.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of the combination of ICI and PARPi to platinum-based chemotherapy provides greatest benefit to p53-abnormal MMRp patients. PD-L1 is a potentially useful biomarker with PD-L1-positive tumors more likely to respond to ICI. Implementation of biomarkers is crucial to redefine the treatment paradigm in a/rEC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 115329"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925001108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Several first-line therapeutic strategies have been evaluated alongside platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (a/rEC). However, the optimal approach remains unclear.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized control trials (RCTs) that evaluate first-line therapeutic strategies in a/rEC involving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects and an extracted individual patient data meta-analysis were performed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by MMR status, p53 status within the MMRp population and PD-L1 status.

Results

A total of 3210 patients with EC were included. In the MMRp population, the combination (ICI and PARPi) showed a not statistically significant PFS benefit compared with each agent alone. In MMRp p53-abnormal patients (n = 590), combining PARPi and ICI statistically improved PFS compared to ICI alone (HR=0.47, 95 %CI 0.40–0.94) with a numerically better outcome compared to PARPi alone (HR=0.63, 95 %CI 0.26–1.57). No benefit from PARPi was observed in the p53 wild-type MMRp population. PD-L1-positivity (n = 1121) appears to predict more benefit from the addition of ICI and PARPi, with a larger benefit of combination therapy. In the MMRd population (n = 769), the best outcomes were observed with ICI alone, with no additional benefit of PARPi. Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events were seen in 75.1 % patients treated with the combination.

Conclusions

The addition of the combination of ICI and PARPi to platinum-based chemotherapy provides greatest benefit to p53-abnormal MMRp patients. PD-L1 is a potentially useful biomarker with PD-L1-positive tumors more likely to respond to ICI. Implementation of biomarkers is crucial to redefine the treatment paradigm in a/rEC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景在对晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌(a/rEC)进行铂类化疗的同时,还对多种一线治疗策略进行了评估。方法进行了一项系统综述,以确定对涉及免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和 PARP 抑制剂(PARPi)的 a/rEC 一线治疗策略进行评估的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用随机效应的频数主义框架进行了网络荟萃分析,并对提取的单个患者数据进行了荟萃分析。主要终点是按MMR状态、MMRp人群中的p53状态和PD-L1状态划分的无进展生存期(PFS)。在MMRp人群中,与单用每种药物相比,联合用药(ICI和PARPi)的PFS获益无统计学意义。在 p53 正常的 MMRp 患者(n = 590)中,与单用 ICI 相比,联合使用 PARPi 和 ICI 可在统计学上改善 PFS(HR=0.47,95 %CI 0.40-0.94),与单用 PARPi 相比,疗效更好(HR=0.63,95 %CI 0.26-1.57)。在p53野生型MMRp人群中未观察到PARPi带来的益处。PD-L1 阳性(n = 1121)似乎预示着 ICI 和 PARPi 的联合治疗可带来更多获益,联合治疗的获益更大。在MMRd人群(n = 769)中,单用ICI可获得最佳疗效,PARPi则无额外获益。在接受联合治疗的患者中,75.1%的患者出现了3级或更严重的治疗相关不良事件。PD-L1是一种潜在的有用生物标志物,PD-L1阳性的肿瘤更有可能对ICI产生反应。生物标志物的应用对于重新定义 a/rEC 的治疗模式至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer
European Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
953
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.
期刊最新文献
Are evidence-based guidelines translating into clinical practice? A national population-based study of the use of treatment intensification in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in England Erratum to "Cancer-specific utility instrument for health economic evaluations: A synopsis of the EORTC QLU-C10D user manual and current validity evidence" [Eur J Cancer (2025) 115235]. Exploring the integration of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: A cross-sectional survey of EORTC healthcare professionals Immunometabolism of tumor-associated macrophages: A therapeutic perspective Immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors as first-line treatment in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1