Safe and efficacious therapeutic outcomes with salvage endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma progression following stereotactic radiosurgery.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-02-28 Print Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.10.JNS241682
Yuki Shinya, Sukwoo Hong, Christoph Wipplinger, Hirotaka Hasegawa, Dana Erickson, Irina Bancos, Justine S Herndon, Tamara M Wipplinger, Sandhya R Palit, Masahiro Shin, Michael J Link, Bruce E Pollock, John L D Atkinson, Nobuhito Saito, Jamie J Van Gompel
{"title":"Safe and efficacious therapeutic outcomes with salvage endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma progression following stereotactic radiosurgery.","authors":"Yuki Shinya, Sukwoo Hong, Christoph Wipplinger, Hirotaka Hasegawa, Dana Erickson, Irina Bancos, Justine S Herndon, Tamara M Wipplinger, Sandhya R Palit, Masahiro Shin, Michael J Link, Bruce E Pollock, John L D Atkinson, Nobuhito Saito, Jamie J Van Gompel","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS241682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers excellent tumor control for pituitary adenoma (PA); however, treatment failure occasionally necessitates salvage surgery. Comprehensive studies on salvage surgical outcomes for recurrent PA after SRS remain scarce. This study aimed to elucidate the outcomes of salvage endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (sETS) for progressive PA failing SRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, two institution-based cohort study analyzed data from patients who underwent sETS for progressive PA failing SRS. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and neurological and endocrinological outcomes in the sETS group were analyzed and compared with those in the primary ETS (pETS) group after propensity score matching using the following variables: age at surgery, maximum tumor diameter, highest Knosp-Steiner classification, and tumor type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen sETS patients (8 males [62%], median age at surgery of 56 years) with 5 nonfunctioning (39%), 6 corticotropic (46%), and 2 other functioning (15%) PAs who received median (range) follow-up of 125 ( 23-169) months were included. None of the patients experienced new neurological deficits or death after sETS. The median (range) tumor resection rate was 90% (80%-100%). The 5-year PFS and DSS rates were 55% and 77%, respectively. All 4 patients (31%) who experienced recurrence after sETS had corticotropic tumors. In the matched cohort analysis between the sETS group with 12 patients and the pETS group with 12 patients, no significant differences were observed in surgical outcomes. PFS rates were marginally higher in the sETS group than in the pETS group (80% vs 49% at 3 years, p = 0.216, log-rank test), and DSS was similar between the two groups (p = 0.543, log-rank test).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors' results indicate that ETS can be safely performed as a salvage treatment after failed SRS with low complication rates and satisfactory tumor control in treatment-resistant PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"165-173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS241682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers excellent tumor control for pituitary adenoma (PA); however, treatment failure occasionally necessitates salvage surgery. Comprehensive studies on salvage surgical outcomes for recurrent PA after SRS remain scarce. This study aimed to elucidate the outcomes of salvage endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (sETS) for progressive PA failing SRS.

Methods: This retrospective, two institution-based cohort study analyzed data from patients who underwent sETS for progressive PA failing SRS. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and neurological and endocrinological outcomes in the sETS group were analyzed and compared with those in the primary ETS (pETS) group after propensity score matching using the following variables: age at surgery, maximum tumor diameter, highest Knosp-Steiner classification, and tumor type.

Results: Thirteen sETS patients (8 males [62%], median age at surgery of 56 years) with 5 nonfunctioning (39%), 6 corticotropic (46%), and 2 other functioning (15%) PAs who received median (range) follow-up of 125 ( 23-169) months were included. None of the patients experienced new neurological deficits or death after sETS. The median (range) tumor resection rate was 90% (80%-100%). The 5-year PFS and DSS rates were 55% and 77%, respectively. All 4 patients (31%) who experienced recurrence after sETS had corticotropic tumors. In the matched cohort analysis between the sETS group with 12 patients and the pETS group with 12 patients, no significant differences were observed in surgical outcomes. PFS rates were marginally higher in the sETS group than in the pETS group (80% vs 49% at 3 years, p = 0.216, log-rank test), and DSS was similar between the two groups (p = 0.543, log-rank test).

Conclusions: The authors' results indicate that ETS can be safely performed as a salvage treatment after failed SRS with low complication rates and satisfactory tumor control in treatment-resistant PA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向放射治疗后垂体腺瘤进展的挽救性经鼻蝶窦手术安全有效的治疗效果。
目的:立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗垂体腺瘤(PA)具有良好的肿瘤控制效果;然而,治疗失败偶尔需要挽救性手术。关于SRS后复发性PA的抢救性手术结果的综合研究仍然很少。本研究旨在阐明挽救性鼻内经蝶窦手术(sETS)治疗进展性PA失败的SRS的结果。方法:这项回顾性的、基于两个机构的队列研究分析了进行性PA失败的SRS患者的数据。在倾向评分匹配后,对sETS组的无进展生存期(PFS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)、神经学和内分泌学结果进行分析,并与原发性ETS (pETS)组进行比较,使用以下变量:手术年龄、最大肿瘤直径、最高Knosp-Steiner分类和肿瘤类型。结果:纳入13例set患者(8例男性[62%],手术时中位年龄56岁),其中5例无功能PAs(39%), 6例促肾上腺皮质激素(46%),2例其他功能PAs(15%),接受中位(范围)随访125(23-169)个月。set后没有患者出现新的神经功能缺损或死亡。中位(范围)肿瘤切除率为90%(80% ~ 100%)。5年PFS和DSS分别为55%和77%。set术后复发的4例患者(31%)均为促皮质性肿瘤。在配对队列分析中,set组(12例)和pet组(12例)的手术结果没有显著差异。set组的PFS率略高于pet组(3年时为80% vs 49%, p = 0.216, log-rank检验),两组间的DSS相似(p = 0.543, log-rank检验)。结论:作者的研究结果表明,在治疗抵抗性PA中,ETS可以作为SRS失败后的一种安全的挽救性治疗,并发症发生率低,肿瘤控制满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with moyamoya disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Effective management of traumatic venous sinus injuries in a resource-limited health system: a retrospective cohort study. Reevaluating routine imaging: clinical utility of postoperative CT after stereotactic brain biopsy. Letter to the Editor. Traumatic cerebral contusion volume, expansion, outcomes, and predictive models. The neurosurgery sports medicine fellowship: a pioneering training paradigm for neurosurgery residents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1