Development and Psychometric Testing of a Tool to Measure Nursing Care Intensity for Stroke Patients.

Amalia Ferrara, Paolo Iovino, Valentina Magni, Maria Rosa Dibuono, Tiziana Brunelli, Rosaria Mastrorocco, Cinzia Favilla, Silvia Giacomelli, Pio Cerchia, Laura Rasero
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Testing of a Tool to Measure Nursing Care Intensity for Stroke Patients.","authors":"Amalia Ferrara, Paolo Iovino, Valentina Magni, Maria Rosa Dibuono, Tiziana Brunelli, Rosaria Mastrorocco, Cinzia Favilla, Silvia Giacomelli, Pio Cerchia, Laura Rasero","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: Nurses play a crucial role in the care of stroke patients improving health outcomes. However, stroke nursing care is complex, and an instrument available to monitor the patient dependence over time and an efficient management of care would be beneficial for the stroke care units. The purpose of this study is to develop and psychometrically test an instrument to measure nursing care intensity for patients admitted to stroke units. METHODS: A 3-step process was implemented. First, item generation was performed based on an established theory. Second, content validity was assessed on the generated pool of items, and finally, the instrument was tested on a sample of 1200 stroke patients at admission and discharge time points, to test its psychometric properties. RESULTS: Item generation was driven by the theory of Roper-Logan-Tierney, and a total of 13 items were derived. Content validity led to the elimination of 5 items. The final instrument, the Chart of Nursing Assessment in Stroke (STROKE-CNA), was made of 8 items. Confirmatory factor analysis had a supportive fit (root mean square error of approximation = 0.077, comparative fit index = 0.99), indicating structural validity. Scores of the instrument at admission were significantly lower than at discharge (P < .001, Cohen d = 1.42), indicating longitudinal validity. The changes in STROKE-CNA scores between admission and discharge were positively correlated with the corresponding changes in scores on the Scandinavia Stroke Scale (r = 0.57, P < .001), confirming adequate responsiveness. The STROKE-CNA scores were negatively correlated with age (admission: r = -0.22, P < .001; discharge: r = -0.28, P < .001), indicating convergent validity. Internal consistency was adequate at 0.93, and interrater reliability was optimal, with Cohen kappa ranging between 0.61 and 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The STROKE-CNA has promising validity and reliability when used for assessing nursing care complexity of patients admitted to stroke units.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Nurses play a crucial role in the care of stroke patients improving health outcomes. However, stroke nursing care is complex, and an instrument available to monitor the patient dependence over time and an efficient management of care would be beneficial for the stroke care units. The purpose of this study is to develop and psychometrically test an instrument to measure nursing care intensity for patients admitted to stroke units. METHODS: A 3-step process was implemented. First, item generation was performed based on an established theory. Second, content validity was assessed on the generated pool of items, and finally, the instrument was tested on a sample of 1200 stroke patients at admission and discharge time points, to test its psychometric properties. RESULTS: Item generation was driven by the theory of Roper-Logan-Tierney, and a total of 13 items were derived. Content validity led to the elimination of 5 items. The final instrument, the Chart of Nursing Assessment in Stroke (STROKE-CNA), was made of 8 items. Confirmatory factor analysis had a supportive fit (root mean square error of approximation = 0.077, comparative fit index = 0.99), indicating structural validity. Scores of the instrument at admission were significantly lower than at discharge (P < .001, Cohen d = 1.42), indicating longitudinal validity. The changes in STROKE-CNA scores between admission and discharge were positively correlated with the corresponding changes in scores on the Scandinavia Stroke Scale (r = 0.57, P < .001), confirming adequate responsiveness. The STROKE-CNA scores were negatively correlated with age (admission: r = -0.22, P < .001; discharge: r = -0.28, P < .001), indicating convergent validity. Internal consistency was adequate at 0.93, and interrater reliability was optimal, with Cohen kappa ranging between 0.61 and 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The STROKE-CNA has promising validity and reliability when used for assessing nursing care complexity of patients admitted to stroke units.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Causes of Delayed Decision-Making by Family Members of Stroke Patients Eligible for Thrombolytic Therapy. Factors Affecting Functional Improvement in the Initial Months of Recovery After Stroke: A Pilot Study. AANN 2024: Reflecting on a Year of Growth and Impact. Development and Psychometric Testing of a Tool to Measure Nursing Care Intensity for Stroke Patients. Stroke Risk Prediction and Diabetes Management in Multiethnic Rural Communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1