Carbon reduction and co-benefits through nature-based solution at a large petrochemical contaminated site in Beijing: Policy implications for China

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145172
Xiaoyan Li, Shijie Wang, Maosheng Zhong, Lin Jiang, Wenyu Zhang, Jihong Li
{"title":"Carbon reduction and co-benefits through nature-based solution at a large petrochemical contaminated site in Beijing: Policy implications for China","authors":"Xiaoyan Li, Shijie Wang, Maosheng Zhong, Lin Jiang, Wenyu Zhang, Jihong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contaminated land remediation industry in China has experienced explosive growth in recent years. However, traditional remediation strategies that typically require high energy and resource inputs are faced with major challenges under China’s 2060 carbon neutrality goal. Here, we provide an environmental sustainability assessment of the remediation of a large petrochemical site, particularly from carbon emissions, using life cycle assessment and calculation of the net ecosystem carbon budget; the results showed that the two traditional remediation strategies had carbon emissions of 6.08 × 10<sup>8</sup> and 1.10 × 10<sup>8</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub> eq) respectively, and nature-based solution (NbS) reduced carbon emissions to 1.80×10<sup>6</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq, corresponding to 99.8% and 98.6% reductions, respectively. Furthermore, if considering the remediation of a total of 302 petrochemical facilities in China, the estimated carbon emissions were 5.53×10<sup>11</sup> and 9.99×10<sup>10</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq based on the two traditional remediation strategies; however, net carbon storage in the NbS could be up to 5.58 × 10<sup>8</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq if only 30% of the petrochemical-contaminated sites would adopt NbS strategies. Finally, challenges for adopting NbS strategies in China are discussed, and sustainable remediation framework and policy recommendation for implementing NbS are suggested. Our findings not only underscore the feasibility and effectiveness of NbS strategies but also provide valuable insights for sustainable management of contaminated sites in China.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145172","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contaminated land remediation industry in China has experienced explosive growth in recent years. However, traditional remediation strategies that typically require high energy and resource inputs are faced with major challenges under China’s 2060 carbon neutrality goal. Here, we provide an environmental sustainability assessment of the remediation of a large petrochemical site, particularly from carbon emissions, using life cycle assessment and calculation of the net ecosystem carbon budget; the results showed that the two traditional remediation strategies had carbon emissions of 6.08 × 108 and 1.10 × 108 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2 eq) respectively, and nature-based solution (NbS) reduced carbon emissions to 1.80×106 kg CO2 eq, corresponding to 99.8% and 98.6% reductions, respectively. Furthermore, if considering the remediation of a total of 302 petrochemical facilities in China, the estimated carbon emissions were 5.53×1011 and 9.99×1010 kg CO2 eq based on the two traditional remediation strategies; however, net carbon storage in the NbS could be up to 5.58 × 108 kg CO2 eq if only 30% of the petrochemical-contaminated sites would adopt NbS strategies. Finally, challenges for adopting NbS strategies in China are discussed, and sustainable remediation framework and policy recommendation for implementing NbS are suggested. Our findings not only underscore the feasibility and effectiveness of NbS strategies but also provide valuable insights for sustainable management of contaminated sites in China.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Large-scale Hyper-enrichment of Gold via Ferrous Sulfide-mediated Sulfuric Acid Leaching Carbon reduction and co-benefits through nature-based solution at a large petrochemical contaminated site in Beijing: Policy implications for China A Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for designing sustainable business models in the context of decarbonization Coupling System Dynamics with Emergy Analysis to Achieve China's Zero-Waste City Goals: A Metabolic Perspective A sustainability perspective for sharing economy business model and its unintended effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1