Prediction of necking instability under tension-shear stress state based on updated modified maximum force criterion

IF 3.8 3区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS International Journal of Solids and Structures Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113319
Nan Gu , Wen Zhang , Deyong Zhou , Meiying Yang , Xinghao Lu , Xincun Zhuang , Zhen Zhao
{"title":"Prediction of necking instability under tension-shear stress state based on updated modified maximum force criterion","authors":"Nan Gu ,&nbsp;Wen Zhang ,&nbsp;Deyong Zhou ,&nbsp;Meiying Yang ,&nbsp;Xinghao Lu ,&nbsp;Xincun Zhuang ,&nbsp;Zhen Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the process from sheet forming to failure, the material might undergo uniform deformation, diffused necking (DN), localized necking (LN), and finally ductile fracture (DF). Researchers have found that a competitive mechanism exists between the LN-induced failure mode and DF-induced failure mode in the ductile metallic material. For tension shear (TS) stress state, most studies are focused on the DF prediction. This paper is concerned with necking instability in TS region and the prediction of necking failures. An updated modified maximum force criterion (uMMFC) model is proposed by considering the effect of in-plane shear stress, in which the strain path at LN onset under TS is no longer plane strain tension but varies with the initial path. Meanwhile, the effect of through-thickness normal stress is introduced into the uMMFC model. By comparing the forming limits obtained from the uMMFC, the original MMFC and the experimental results under uniaxial tension tests and Nakajima tests, it is concluded that the uMMFC model can well predict the forming limit curve under TS. Furthermore, the uMMFC model with the introduction of strain path modification after DN demonstrates a further improvement in prediction accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","volume":"313 ","pages":"Article 113319"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020768325001052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the process from sheet forming to failure, the material might undergo uniform deformation, diffused necking (DN), localized necking (LN), and finally ductile fracture (DF). Researchers have found that a competitive mechanism exists between the LN-induced failure mode and DF-induced failure mode in the ductile metallic material. For tension shear (TS) stress state, most studies are focused on the DF prediction. This paper is concerned with necking instability in TS region and the prediction of necking failures. An updated modified maximum force criterion (uMMFC) model is proposed by considering the effect of in-plane shear stress, in which the strain path at LN onset under TS is no longer plane strain tension but varies with the initial path. Meanwhile, the effect of through-thickness normal stress is introduced into the uMMFC model. By comparing the forming limits obtained from the uMMFC, the original MMFC and the experimental results under uniaxial tension tests and Nakajima tests, it is concluded that the uMMFC model can well predict the forming limit curve under TS. Furthermore, the uMMFC model with the introduction of strain path modification after DN demonstrates a further improvement in prediction accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于最新修正的最大力准则预测拉伸剪切应力状态下的颈缩不稳定性
在板料成形到失效过程中,材料可能经历均匀变形、扩散颈缩(DN)、局部颈缩(LN),最后发生延性断裂(DF)。研究人员发现,在延展性金属材料中,ln诱导破坏模式与df诱导破坏模式之间存在竞争机制。对于拉剪切应力状态,大多数研究都集中在DF预测上。本文研究了TS区颈缩失稳及颈缩失效的预测问题。考虑面内剪切应力的影响,提出了一种改进的修正最大力准则(uMMFC)模型,该模型在TS作用下LN开始时的应变路径不再是平面应变张力,而是随初始路径变化。同时,在uMMFC模型中引入了贯穿厚度法向应力的影响。通过对比单轴拉伸试验和中岛试验下uMMFC、原始MMFC和实验结果得到的成形极限,得出uMMFC模型可以很好地预测TS作用下的成形极限曲线,并且引入DN后应变路径修正的uMMFC模型预测精度进一步提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
405
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Solids and Structures has as its objective the publication and dissemination of original research in Mechanics of Solids and Structures as a field of Applied Science and Engineering. It fosters thus the exchange of ideas among workers in different parts of the world and also among workers who emphasize different aspects of the foundations and applications of the field. Standing as it does at the cross-roads of Materials Science, Life Sciences, Mathematics, Physics and Engineering Design, the Mechanics of Solids and Structures is experiencing considerable growth as a result of recent technological advances. The Journal, by providing an international medium of communication, is encouraging this growth and is encompassing all aspects of the field from the more classical problems of structural analysis to mechanics of solids continually interacting with other media and including fracture, flow, wave propagation, heat transfer, thermal effects in solids, optimum design methods, model analysis, structural topology and numerical techniques. Interest extends to both inorganic and organic solids and structures.
期刊最新文献
Coupling negative Poisson’s ratio with multifunctionality: advances in auxetic metamaterials Modelling the elastic properties of woven composites with transverse bundle cracks Theoretical modeling and tailored design of mechanoelectrical behavior in flexible piezoelectric metamaterials The tip region of a shallow hydraulic fracture Competitive fracture propagation across different regimes during multi-stage hydraulic fracturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1