Does patent fee reform lower the bar? Evidence from the deferred patent examination system in Japan

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105208
Masayo Kani , Yoichiro Nishimura
{"title":"Does patent fee reform lower the bar? Evidence from the deferred patent examination system in Japan","authors":"Masayo Kani ,&nbsp;Yoichiro Nishimura","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The patent fee system is a substantial policy tool that enables the quality control of patents. In this study, we empirically examine whether the 2011 patent reform in Japan, which reduced the level of patent examination fees, has had a negative effect on the quality of pre-examination patents and post-examination patents. Using a difference-in-differences approach with comprehensive Japanese patent data, we find that even if there has been a negative effect of the 2011 patent reform on the quality of pre-examination patents, its impact has been very limited. In contrast, we find no negative effect of the 2011 patent reform on the quality of post-examination patents. We also find that the negative impact of the 2011 patent reform can be observed only in the lower tail of the patent quality index distribution, not in the upper tail. Thus, we conclude that the detrimental effect of the reform on patent quality in Japan has been negligible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 4","pages":"Article 105208"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004873332500037X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The patent fee system is a substantial policy tool that enables the quality control of patents. In this study, we empirically examine whether the 2011 patent reform in Japan, which reduced the level of patent examination fees, has had a negative effect on the quality of pre-examination patents and post-examination patents. Using a difference-in-differences approach with comprehensive Japanese patent data, we find that even if there has been a negative effect of the 2011 patent reform on the quality of pre-examination patents, its impact has been very limited. In contrast, we find no negative effect of the 2011 patent reform on the quality of post-examination patents. We also find that the negative impact of the 2011 patent reform can be observed only in the lower tail of the patent quality index distribution, not in the upper tail. Thus, we conclude that the detrimental effect of the reform on patent quality in Japan has been negligible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专利费用改革会降低门槛吗?来自日本专利延期审查制度的证据
专利费制度是实现专利质量控制的重要政策工具。在本研究中,我们实证检验了2011年日本的专利改革是否对审查前专利和审查后专利的质量产生了负面影响,该改革降低了专利审查费用水平。采用综合日本专利数据的差异中差异方法,我们发现即使2011年专利改革对预审查专利质量有负面影响,其影响也非常有限。相比之下,我们发现2011年专利改革对事后审查专利质量没有负面影响。我们还发现,2011年专利改革的负面影响只出现在专利质量指数分布的下尾部,而不出现在上尾部。因此,我们得出结论,日本专利改革对专利质量的不利影响可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Disruptive sustainability through digital innovations: Overcoming information asymmetries to benefit small-scale producers Did the defend trade secrets act spur the reliance on trade secrets? Entrepreneurs-as-Scientists and entrepreneurial team formation strategies: A randomized control trial experiment Pluriversal technologies: A decolonial typology of knowledge integration for disruptive sustainability Towards disruptive sustainability: A multi-level analysis of business models driving sustainability transitions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1