Ali Najarnezhadmashhadi , Noé Das Neves , Kimberly Yorllet Toala Escobar , Carl Häggmark , Dan Karlsson , Peter Franzén , Christophe Duwig , Henrik Kusar
{"title":"Enhancing CO2 capture efficiency in a lab-scale spray tower: An experimental study on flow configurations using potassium carbonate","authors":"Ali Najarnezhadmashhadi , Noé Das Neves , Kimberly Yorllet Toala Escobar , Carl Häggmark , Dan Karlsson , Peter Franzén , Christophe Duwig , Henrik Kusar","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2025.02.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spray towers have proven to be efficient in capturing gases and vapours, finding widespread use across various applications including CO<sub>2</sub> capture. As there is scarce reference material regarding spray tower performances with different flow configurations other than the conventional counter-current flow, as well as the use of substitute solvents to MEA, there is a need to study different configurations and setup designs, including different placements of gas and liquid inlets in the absorber tower, to find the optimal configuration. In this study, the capture of CO<sub>2</sub> from a CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> mixture using unpromoted potassium carbonate as the absorbent in a lab-scale spray tower was experimentally measured in four different flow configurations over a wide range of operating conditions, including gas and liquid flow rates, CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> concentration and solvent temperature. Among four different configurations, the two sides co-current configuration, with gas nozzles positioned on opposite sides of the column and liquid coming from above, was found to be the most effective setup for enhancing CO<sub>2</sub> capture efficiency by promoting better mixing and contact between gas and liquid.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10019,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","volume":"216 ","pages":"Pages 186-199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876225000760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spray towers have proven to be efficient in capturing gases and vapours, finding widespread use across various applications including CO2 capture. As there is scarce reference material regarding spray tower performances with different flow configurations other than the conventional counter-current flow, as well as the use of substitute solvents to MEA, there is a need to study different configurations and setup designs, including different placements of gas and liquid inlets in the absorber tower, to find the optimal configuration. In this study, the capture of CO2 from a CO2/N2 mixture using unpromoted potassium carbonate as the absorbent in a lab-scale spray tower was experimentally measured in four different flow configurations over a wide range of operating conditions, including gas and liquid flow rates, CO2 concentration, K2CO3 concentration and solvent temperature. Among four different configurations, the two sides co-current configuration, with gas nozzles positioned on opposite sides of the column and liquid coming from above, was found to be the most effective setup for enhancing CO2 capture efficiency by promoting better mixing and contact between gas and liquid.
期刊介绍:
ChERD aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in chemical engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in chemical engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in plant or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of traditional chemical engineering.