A load following reactivity control system for nuclear microreactors

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Progress in Nuclear Energy Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.105676
Kamal K. Abdulraheem, Sooyoung Choi, Qicang Shen, Brendan Kochunas, Majdi I. Radaideh
{"title":"A load following reactivity control system for nuclear microreactors","authors":"Kamal K. Abdulraheem,&nbsp;Sooyoung Choi,&nbsp;Qicang Shen,&nbsp;Brendan Kochunas,&nbsp;Majdi I. Radaideh","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.105676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microreactors are scaled-down versions of small modular nuclear reactors designed to simplify the deployment and reduce the cost of nuclear energy. One of the key requirements for achieving these goals is the development of reliable load-following control systems. In this study, we designed and analyzed three load-following control systems for a microreactor design. The microreactor core is modeled using a nonlinear point kinetics model coupled with thermal-hydraulic, fission product poison, and reactivity models. The first control method implemented was a nonlinear second-order super-twisting sliding mode control system (STC), enhanced with a moving average filter to mitigate chattering—a high-frequency phenomenon that can damage actuators. The second approach utilized a nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) scheme with an extended Kalman filter for improved state estimation. The final design was a PID controller, optimized with anti-windup compensation for the integral term and a filter for the derivative component to handle noise. We evaluated these control systems through simulation experiments, focusing on their stability, tracking performance, and control effort. The results show that all three control systems achieved the desired load-following capability. While the PID controller required the least control effort, error analysis metrics such as integral absolute error (IAE) and integral time absolute error (ITAE) revealed that its performance deteriorates over time due to its linear nature. In contrast, the second-order sliding mode controller (STC) and NMPC demonstrated superior error handling and robustness than PID concerning accuracy and stability. Nonetheless, unlike the nonlinear model predictive controller, the second-order sliding mode control system still suffers from chattering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105676"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025000745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microreactors are scaled-down versions of small modular nuclear reactors designed to simplify the deployment and reduce the cost of nuclear energy. One of the key requirements for achieving these goals is the development of reliable load-following control systems. In this study, we designed and analyzed three load-following control systems for a microreactor design. The microreactor core is modeled using a nonlinear point kinetics model coupled with thermal-hydraulic, fission product poison, and reactivity models. The first control method implemented was a nonlinear second-order super-twisting sliding mode control system (STC), enhanced with a moving average filter to mitigate chattering—a high-frequency phenomenon that can damage actuators. The second approach utilized a nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) scheme with an extended Kalman filter for improved state estimation. The final design was a PID controller, optimized with anti-windup compensation for the integral term and a filter for the derivative component to handle noise. We evaluated these control systems through simulation experiments, focusing on their stability, tracking performance, and control effort. The results show that all three control systems achieved the desired load-following capability. While the PID controller required the least control effort, error analysis metrics such as integral absolute error (IAE) and integral time absolute error (ITAE) revealed that its performance deteriorates over time due to its linear nature. In contrast, the second-order sliding mode controller (STC) and NMPC demonstrated superior error handling and robustness than PID concerning accuracy and stability. Nonetheless, unlike the nonlinear model predictive controller, the second-order sliding mode control system still suffers from chattering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A simulator and controller for the real-time autonomous operation of pressurized water reactors based on expert systems Advanced and Small Modular Reactors’ supply chain: Current status and potential for global cooperation A load following reactivity control system for nuclear microreactors Numerical simulation of the effect of key structural parameters on the operating characteristics of open natural circulation systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1