Kamal K. Abdulraheem, Sooyoung Choi, Qicang Shen, Brendan Kochunas, Majdi I. Radaideh
{"title":"A load following reactivity control system for nuclear microreactors","authors":"Kamal K. Abdulraheem, Sooyoung Choi, Qicang Shen, Brendan Kochunas, Majdi I. Radaideh","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.105676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microreactors are scaled-down versions of small modular nuclear reactors designed to simplify the deployment and reduce the cost of nuclear energy. One of the key requirements for achieving these goals is the development of reliable load-following control systems. In this study, we designed and analyzed three load-following control systems for a microreactor design. The microreactor core is modeled using a nonlinear point kinetics model coupled with thermal-hydraulic, fission product poison, and reactivity models. The first control method implemented was a nonlinear second-order super-twisting sliding mode control system (STC), enhanced with a moving average filter to mitigate chattering—a high-frequency phenomenon that can damage actuators. The second approach utilized a nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) scheme with an extended Kalman filter for improved state estimation. The final design was a PID controller, optimized with anti-windup compensation for the integral term and a filter for the derivative component to handle noise. We evaluated these control systems through simulation experiments, focusing on their stability, tracking performance, and control effort. The results show that all three control systems achieved the desired load-following capability. While the PID controller required the least control effort, error analysis metrics such as integral absolute error (IAE) and integral time absolute error (ITAE) revealed that its performance deteriorates over time due to its linear nature. In contrast, the second-order sliding mode controller (STC) and NMPC demonstrated superior error handling and robustness than PID concerning accuracy and stability. Nonetheless, unlike the nonlinear model predictive controller, the second-order sliding mode control system still suffers from chattering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105676"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025000745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microreactors are scaled-down versions of small modular nuclear reactors designed to simplify the deployment and reduce the cost of nuclear energy. One of the key requirements for achieving these goals is the development of reliable load-following control systems. In this study, we designed and analyzed three load-following control systems for a microreactor design. The microreactor core is modeled using a nonlinear point kinetics model coupled with thermal-hydraulic, fission product poison, and reactivity models. The first control method implemented was a nonlinear second-order super-twisting sliding mode control system (STC), enhanced with a moving average filter to mitigate chattering—a high-frequency phenomenon that can damage actuators. The second approach utilized a nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) scheme with an extended Kalman filter for improved state estimation. The final design was a PID controller, optimized with anti-windup compensation for the integral term and a filter for the derivative component to handle noise. We evaluated these control systems through simulation experiments, focusing on their stability, tracking performance, and control effort. The results show that all three control systems achieved the desired load-following capability. While the PID controller required the least control effort, error analysis metrics such as integral absolute error (IAE) and integral time absolute error (ITAE) revealed that its performance deteriorates over time due to its linear nature. In contrast, the second-order sliding mode controller (STC) and NMPC demonstrated superior error handling and robustness than PID concerning accuracy and stability. Nonetheless, unlike the nonlinear model predictive controller, the second-order sliding mode control system still suffers from chattering.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.