A simple simultaneous envelope/system optimization for energy efficiency improvement in near-zero energy buildings

IF 7.6 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management-X Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100951
Martín Muñoz-Salcedo , José L. Saquinaula-Brito , Jhonny Ortíz-Mata , Fernando Peci-López
{"title":"A simple simultaneous envelope/system optimization for energy efficiency improvement in near-zero energy buildings","authors":"Martín Muñoz-Salcedo ,&nbsp;José L. Saquinaula-Brito ,&nbsp;Jhonny Ortíz-Mata ,&nbsp;Fernando Peci-López","doi":"10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops a simple yet innovative framework for the simultaneous long-term optimization of building envelope strategies and energy systems in near-zero energy buildings (nZEB). The proposed framework evaluates the energy and economic performance of four envelope strategies—phase change materials (PCM), aerogel insulation, green walls, and awnings—integrated into a distributed generation mix comprising photovoltaic (PV) systems, wind turbines, battery storage, and grid support. The main objective is to analyze the influence of envelope solutions within the distributed generation mix to meet the building’s energy demand. The model is formulated as a mixed-integer disciplined convex program (MIDCP) and solved using the CVXR package in R, minimizing the total cost of envelope and energy systems over a 30-year period. The cost function is based on the CEN EN 15459 standard. Model validation is performed using real experimental data from a building located in Ecuador’s coastal region, characterized by a hot and humid climate. Its robustness is further verified through a sensitivity analysis that explores economic parameter variations and long-term climate change scenarios, combining EnergyPlus simulations with eplusr in R. Results indicate that the awning-based envelope strategy achieves the best performance under current conditions, with energy savings of 12–15 kW/year and a payback period of 8 years. For long-term economic viability, investment cost reductions of 73 %, 60 %, and 71 % are necessary for PCM, aerogel, and green wall solutions, respectively. This integrated optimization model provides a practical decision-making tool for evaluating cost-effectiveness and energy performance under evolving market and climate conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37131,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100951"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525000832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study develops a simple yet innovative framework for the simultaneous long-term optimization of building envelope strategies and energy systems in near-zero energy buildings (nZEB). The proposed framework evaluates the energy and economic performance of four envelope strategies—phase change materials (PCM), aerogel insulation, green walls, and awnings—integrated into a distributed generation mix comprising photovoltaic (PV) systems, wind turbines, battery storage, and grid support. The main objective is to analyze the influence of envelope solutions within the distributed generation mix to meet the building’s energy demand. The model is formulated as a mixed-integer disciplined convex program (MIDCP) and solved using the CVXR package in R, minimizing the total cost of envelope and energy systems over a 30-year period. The cost function is based on the CEN EN 15459 standard. Model validation is performed using real experimental data from a building located in Ecuador’s coastal region, characterized by a hot and humid climate. Its robustness is further verified through a sensitivity analysis that explores economic parameter variations and long-term climate change scenarios, combining EnergyPlus simulations with eplusr in R. Results indicate that the awning-based envelope strategy achieves the best performance under current conditions, with energy savings of 12–15 kW/year and a payback period of 8 years. For long-term economic viability, investment cost reductions of 73 %, 60 %, and 71 % are necessary for PCM, aerogel, and green wall solutions, respectively. This integrated optimization model provides a practical decision-making tool for evaluating cost-effectiveness and energy performance under evolving market and climate conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个简单的同时围护结构/系统优化,以提高近零能耗建筑的能源效率
本研究为近零能耗建筑(nZEB)的建筑围护结构策略和能源系统的同时长期优化开发了一个简单而创新的框架。拟议的框架评估了四种围护结构策略的能源和经济性能——相变材料(PCM)、气凝胶绝缘、绿色墙壁和遮阳篷——整合到分布式发电组合中,包括光伏(PV)系统、风力涡轮机、电池存储和电网支持。主要目的是分析围护结构解决方案对分布式发电组合的影响,以满足建筑的能源需求。该模型被表述为一个混合整数有序凸规划(MIDCP),并使用R中的CVXR包进行求解,从而在30年的时间内将围护结构和能源系统的总成本降至最低。成本函数基于CEN EN 15459标准。模型验证使用了厄瓜多尔沿海地区一栋建筑的真实实验数据,该地区气候炎热潮湿。通过对经济参数变化和长期气候变化情景的敏感性分析,结合EnergyPlus模拟和r中的eplusr,进一步验证了其鲁棒性。结果表明,在当前条件下,基于遮阳篷的围护结构策略达到了最佳性能,节能12-15 kW/年,投资回收期为8年。从长期经济可行性来看,PCM、气凝胶和绿墙解决方案的投资成本分别需要降低73%、60%和71%。该综合优化模型为在不断变化的市场和气候条件下评估成本效益和能源绩效提供了实用的决策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Energy Conversion and Management: X is the open access extension of the reputable journal Energy Conversion and Management, serving as a platform for interdisciplinary research on a wide array of critical energy subjects. The journal is dedicated to publishing original contributions and in-depth technical review articles that present groundbreaking research on topics spanning energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management, and sustainability. The scope of Energy Conversion and Management: X encompasses various forms of energy, including mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic, and electric energy. It addresses all known energy resources, highlighting both conventional sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power, as well as renewable resources such as solar, biomass, hydro, wind, geothermal, and ocean energy.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of new and used Lithium-Ion electric motorcycle batteries degradation through cycle testing and surface temperature evaluation for second-life applications A simulation-based assessment of Community-Based Energy Trading for circular energy sharing in low-income communities Maximizing profit and sustainability in RoR hydropower: an AI-driven hydrogen decision support model (H2-DSM) Robust framework for simultaneous optimization of performance and stability in active free-piston stirling engines Kinetics and deactivation modelling of fibrous silica-supported Ni-Ga catalysts for COx-free hydrogen production via methane splitting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1