Prevalence of refractive errors among school students in Iraq — A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.8 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2024.100534
Hassan A. Aljaberi , I.R. Ali , Zaydoon Tariq M. Noori
{"title":"Prevalence of refractive errors among school students in Iraq — A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hassan A. Aljaberi ,&nbsp;I.R. Ali ,&nbsp;Zaydoon Tariq M. Noori","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This research aimed to thoroughly examine and meta-analyse statistical information about the prevalence of refractive error in Iraq.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To discover every pertinent Iraqi epidemiological study from March 2014 to March 2024, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched and reviewed. The Iraqi refractive error rate was interesting. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software received unprocessed events and sample sizes for effect size calculations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A meta-analysis was undertaken by pooling data from 10 studies. The fixed effects model indicates an estimated effect size of 29.8% (95% CI: 28.6—30.9%). However, the statistical measures of heterogeneity (Q-value <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; I2 = 98.707) showed significant heterogeneity among the studies, which indicates that a random-effects model should be used. The random effects model suggests that the prevalence of refractive error in the Iraqi population is predicted to be 27.6% (95% CI: 18.9—38.5%). The most common refractive defect was myopia, found in 35.1% of cases (95% CI: 24.9—46.8%). Astigmatism was the second most prevalent, affecting 32.2% (95% CI: 19.1—49.0%), followed by hyperopia in 23.9% (95% CI: 16.0—34.2%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Current estimate of refractive error prevalence in Iraq may be conservative of this condition's burden. Nevertheless, this corresponds to a minimum of 8 to 18 million individuals in Iraq who have a refractive error. Due to study variability, wide estimate ranges, and random effects, more research and reliable sources are needed to obtain more accurate results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"18 1","pages":"Article 100534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429624000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This research aimed to thoroughly examine and meta-analyse statistical information about the prevalence of refractive error in Iraq.

Methods

To discover every pertinent Iraqi epidemiological study from March 2014 to March 2024, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched and reviewed. The Iraqi refractive error rate was interesting. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software received unprocessed events and sample sizes for effect size calculations.

Results

A meta-analysis was undertaken by pooling data from 10 studies. The fixed effects model indicates an estimated effect size of 29.8% (95% CI: 28.6—30.9%). However, the statistical measures of heterogeneity (Q-value p < 0.001; I2 = 98.707) showed significant heterogeneity among the studies, which indicates that a random-effects model should be used. The random effects model suggests that the prevalence of refractive error in the Iraqi population is predicted to be 27.6% (95% CI: 18.9—38.5%). The most common refractive defect was myopia, found in 35.1% of cases (95% CI: 24.9—46.8%). Astigmatism was the second most prevalent, affecting 32.2% (95% CI: 19.1—49.0%), followed by hyperopia in 23.9% (95% CI: 16.0—34.2%).

Conclusions

Current estimate of refractive error prevalence in Iraq may be conservative of this condition's burden. Nevertheless, this corresponds to a minimum of 8 to 18 million individuals in Iraq who have a refractive error. Due to study variability, wide estimate ranges, and random effects, more research and reliable sources are needed to obtain more accurate results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉克在校学生屈光不正的患病率 - 系统回顾与荟萃分析
目的 本研究旨在对伊拉克屈光不正患病率的统计信息进行全面检查和元分析。方法 为了发现从 2014 年 3 月至 2024 年 3 月期间伊拉克的所有相关流行病学研究,我们对 Scopus、Science Direct、Google Scholar、Embase、PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了搜索和审查。伊拉克的屈光不正率很有意思。综合荟萃分析软件接收了未经处理的事件和样本量,以计算效应大小。结果通过汇集 10 项研究的数据进行了荟萃分析。固定效应模型显示,估计效应大小为 29.8%(95% CI:28.6-30.9%)。然而,异质性统计量度(Q 值 p < 0.001; I2 = 98.707)显示,各研究之间存在显著的异质性,这表明应使用随机效应模型。随机效应模型表明,伊拉克人口的屈光不正患病率预计为 27.6%(95% CI:18.9-38.5%)。最常见的屈光缺陷是近视,占 35.1%(95% CI:24.9-46.8%)。结论目前对伊拉克屈光不正患病率的估计可能对这一疾病的负担有所保守。尽管如此,这相当于伊拉克至少有 800 万到 1800 万人存在屈光不正。由于研究的多变性、估计范围的广泛性以及随机效应,需要更多的研究和可靠的资料来源才能获得更准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Improvement of dryness symptoms at the end of the day with artificial tear. Vision-related quality of life in Polish patients with keratoconus: A cross-sectional study using the KORQ questionnaire Long-term astigmatism progression and its interaction with spherical equivalent in Chinese school-age children: A hospital-based cohort study Validation and comparison of two commercial OCT systems for in vitro measurement of soft contact lens thickness Influence of iris color on corneal densitometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1