Full-Scale Beam-To-Column Subassemblage Testing for Seismic Evaluation of Deep Columns

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4309
Claudio Sepulveda, Gulen Ozkula, Gilberto Mosqueda, Chia-Ming Uang, Chung-Che Chou, Kung-Juin Wang, Sherif El-Tawil, Jason McCormick
{"title":"Full-Scale Beam-To-Column Subassemblage Testing for Seismic Evaluation of Deep Columns","authors":"Claudio Sepulveda,&nbsp;Gulen Ozkula,&nbsp;Gilberto Mosqueda,&nbsp;Chia-Ming Uang,&nbsp;Chung-Che Chou,&nbsp;Kung-Juin Wang,&nbsp;Sherif El-Tawil,&nbsp;Jason McCormick","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Steel moment frames composed of wide-flange steel members are commonly used in seismic regions, with deep and slender column sections often selected to economically satisfy drift limit requirements. The section slenderness makes the columns more susceptible to local and global buckling and subsequent axial shortening when subjected to combined high axial forces and lateral deformations. Numerous tests have been conducted on individual column members under a wide range of axial loads and loading patterns. Experimental data of subassembly or complete frame configurations providing insight into system level interaction of the column with the frame are more limited. To address this concern, a full-scale testing program was conducted on four cruciform beam-to-column subassemblage subjected to loading patterns based on cyclic quasi-static and slow hybrid simulation. Quasi-static tests followed standard AISC loading protocol with constant column axial load ranging from 20% to 40% of the yield capacity. Advanced hybrid simulations subjected the specimens to realistic earthquake loading patterns to levels consistent with design basis earthquake (DBE) and maximum considered earthquake (MCE) ground motions. A full nonlinear model of a complete 6-story frame was developed for the numerical substructure in the hybrid simulation. The observed local and global responses of two quasi-static and two hybrid tests are presented, providing valuable data towards improving the understanding of progress of damage for these systems through advanced testing techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 4","pages":"1289-1310"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4309","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Steel moment frames composed of wide-flange steel members are commonly used in seismic regions, with deep and slender column sections often selected to economically satisfy drift limit requirements. The section slenderness makes the columns more susceptible to local and global buckling and subsequent axial shortening when subjected to combined high axial forces and lateral deformations. Numerous tests have been conducted on individual column members under a wide range of axial loads and loading patterns. Experimental data of subassembly or complete frame configurations providing insight into system level interaction of the column with the frame are more limited. To address this concern, a full-scale testing program was conducted on four cruciform beam-to-column subassemblage subjected to loading patterns based on cyclic quasi-static and slow hybrid simulation. Quasi-static tests followed standard AISC loading protocol with constant column axial load ranging from 20% to 40% of the yield capacity. Advanced hybrid simulations subjected the specimens to realistic earthquake loading patterns to levels consistent with design basis earthquake (DBE) and maximum considered earthquake (MCE) ground motions. A full nonlinear model of a complete 6-story frame was developed for the numerical substructure in the hybrid simulation. The observed local and global responses of two quasi-static and two hybrid tests are presented, providing valuable data towards improving the understanding of progress of damage for these systems through advanced testing techniques.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information Issue information Dynamic Analysis of a Periodic Soil-Structure Interaction System to Reduce Ground Vibration Full-Scale Beam-To-Column Subassemblage Testing for Seismic Evaluation of Deep Columns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1