Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of RV Strain Defined as RV/LV Ratio on Chest CT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1111/echo.70107
Ankit Hanmandlu, Aniruddh Mannari, Aiden Abidov
{"title":"Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of RV Strain Defined as RV/LV Ratio on Chest CT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review","authors":"Ankit Hanmandlu,&nbsp;Aniruddh Mannari,&nbsp;Aiden Abidov","doi":"10.1111/echo.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of acute RV enlargement (often described as RV strain or RV-S), with significant associated mortality and morbidity. Chest CT pulmonary angiography is a widely available diagnostic modality to rule out PE and assess for RV-S, if positive for PE. Frequently, RV-S is assessed by measuring the right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) ratio (RV/LV ratio); however, there is no standardized technique for measuring CT RV/LV ratio, and the prognostic value of this marker is not well-defined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2023. A total of 35 studies were eligible for data collection based on relevance, completeness, and quality of data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The most common clinically effective cutoffs of the RV/LV ratio used were 0.9 and 1.0, and the most common methodology involved measuring RV and LV diameters within the same axial slice on both 2D (axial) and reconstructed 4-Chamber (4-Ch) views. Although 4-Ch and axial views had different RV/LV ratio predictability regarding specific outcomes such as 30-day death, there was no significant overall difference in the prognostic value across the different cutoffs used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study demonstrates a lack of definite standardization in measuring CT RV/LV ratio in acute PE. Based on our review, we propose an RV strain defined as CT RV/LV ratio &gt;1.0 measured on a single axial CT slice as an easily measurable and reliable marker of RV dysfunction in acute PE, with associated significant prognostic value in predicting adverse outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of acute RV enlargement (often described as RV strain or RV-S), with significant associated mortality and morbidity. Chest CT pulmonary angiography is a widely available diagnostic modality to rule out PE and assess for RV-S, if positive for PE. Frequently, RV-S is assessed by measuring the right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) ratio (RV/LV ratio); however, there is no standardized technique for measuring CT RV/LV ratio, and the prognostic value of this marker is not well-defined.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2023. A total of 35 studies were eligible for data collection based on relevance, completeness, and quality of data.

Results

The most common clinically effective cutoffs of the RV/LV ratio used were 0.9 and 1.0, and the most common methodology involved measuring RV and LV diameters within the same axial slice on both 2D (axial) and reconstructed 4-Chamber (4-Ch) views. Although 4-Ch and axial views had different RV/LV ratio predictability regarding specific outcomes such as 30-day death, there was no significant overall difference in the prognostic value across the different cutoffs used.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates a lack of definite standardization in measuring CT RV/LV ratio in acute PE. Based on our review, we propose an RV strain defined as CT RV/LV ratio >1.0 measured on a single axial CT slice as an easily measurable and reliable marker of RV dysfunction in acute PE, with associated significant prognostic value in predicting adverse outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of RV Strain Defined as RV/LV Ratio on Chest CT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review Multimodality Imaging and Immune-Related Adverse Events During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment: Where Do We Stand? Afterload Mismatch After Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair: Echocardiographic Evaluation and Clinical Implications Advancements in Computed Tomography Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism Assessment Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Drainage Caused by Malposition of Septum Primum in Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1