Association of Plaque Characteristics With New Ischemic Lesions After Carotid Artery Stenting

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1111/cns.70312
Senhao Zhang, Mengmeng Feng, Fan Yu, Xin Meng, Yue Zhang, Bixiao Cui, Tao Wang, Weizhao Lu, Hongwei Yang, Shaozhen Yan, Jie Lu
{"title":"Association of Plaque Characteristics With New Ischemic Lesions After Carotid Artery Stenting","authors":"Senhao Zhang,&nbsp;Mengmeng Feng,&nbsp;Fan Yu,&nbsp;Xin Meng,&nbsp;Yue Zhang,&nbsp;Bixiao Cui,&nbsp;Tao Wang,&nbsp;Weizhao Lu,&nbsp;Hongwei Yang,&nbsp;Shaozhen Yan,&nbsp;Jie Lu","doi":"10.1111/cns.70312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a common treatment for carotid artery stenosis, but it can lead to new ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted images (DWI) during the perioperative period. Identifying these lesions early is crucial to preventing recurrent ischemic strokes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent CAS. Preoperative carotid PET/MR examinations and postoperative brain MRI were performed. Clinicians identified the responsible carotid artery based on symptoms and records. Vessel morphology, plaque characteristics, and inflammatory uptake were analyzed. The standardized uptake value and tissue-to-background ratio quantified <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose(<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) uptake. The symptomatic carotid atheroma inflammation lumen-stenosis(SCAIL) score assessed stenosis severity and inflammation. The primary outcome was the presence of new ischemic lesions on DWI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the 47 patients (mean age, 65 ± 7 years; 44 males), 30 (63.8%) exhibited new ischemic lesions. These patients had a higher prevalence of AHA type VI plaques (50.0% vs. 17.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.028), higher PET uptake (43.3% vs. 11.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.026), and higher SCAIL scores (63.3% vs. 23.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). The most common distribution pattern of new ischemic lesions was located in the mixed (in and beyond of the treated artery) territory (36.2%). Of the 30 participants with new ischemic lesions, 15 (50%) had lesions located in both peripheral brain areas and deep brain areas. In the adjusted model, high PET uptake and SCAIL scores were independently associated with new ischemic lesions (aOR = 7.26, 95% CI: 1.22, 73.59; <i>p</i> = 0.049 and aOR = 7.06 [95% CI: 1.50, 44.18]; <i>p</i> = 0.020).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Carotid PET/MR-related indicators can effectively predict the risk of new ischemic lesions on DWI during the perioperative period after carotid artery stenting, providing important references for early identification of high-risk patients for recurrent ischemic stroke. Further large-scale randomized controlled studies are necessary to validate the clinical application value of these indicators.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":154,"journal":{"name":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cns.70312","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a common treatment for carotid artery stenosis, but it can lead to new ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted images (DWI) during the perioperative period. Identifying these lesions early is crucial to preventing recurrent ischemic strokes.

Methods

This retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent CAS. Preoperative carotid PET/MR examinations and postoperative brain MRI were performed. Clinicians identified the responsible carotid artery based on symptoms and records. Vessel morphology, plaque characteristics, and inflammatory uptake were analyzed. The standardized uptake value and tissue-to-background ratio quantified 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG) uptake. The symptomatic carotid atheroma inflammation lumen-stenosis(SCAIL) score assessed stenosis severity and inflammation. The primary outcome was the presence of new ischemic lesions on DWI.

Results

Among the 47 patients (mean age, 65 ± 7 years; 44 males), 30 (63.8%) exhibited new ischemic lesions. These patients had a higher prevalence of AHA type VI plaques (50.0% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.028), higher PET uptake (43.3% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.026), and higher SCAIL scores (63.3% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.009). The most common distribution pattern of new ischemic lesions was located in the mixed (in and beyond of the treated artery) territory (36.2%). Of the 30 participants with new ischemic lesions, 15 (50%) had lesions located in both peripheral brain areas and deep brain areas. In the adjusted model, high PET uptake and SCAIL scores were independently associated with new ischemic lesions (aOR = 7.26, 95% CI: 1.22, 73.59; p = 0.049 and aOR = 7.06 [95% CI: 1.50, 44.18]; p = 0.020).

Conclusion

Carotid PET/MR-related indicators can effectively predict the risk of new ischemic lesions on DWI during the perioperative period after carotid artery stenting, providing important references for early identification of high-risk patients for recurrent ischemic stroke. Further large-scale randomized controlled studies are necessary to validate the clinical application value of these indicators.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉支架植入术后斑块特征与新缺血性病变的关系
颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)是治疗颈动脉狭窄的常用方法,但在围手术期弥散加权图像(DWI)上可导致新的缺血性脑病变。及早发现这些病变对预防缺血性中风复发至关重要。方法回顾性研究47例行CAS的患者。术前行颈动脉PET/MR检查,术后行脑MRI检查。临床医生根据症状和记录确定责任颈动脉。分析血管形态、斑块特征和炎症摄取。标准化摄取值和组织-背景比量化了18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)的摄取。症状性颈动脉粥样硬化炎症管腔狭窄(SCAIL)评分评估狭窄严重程度和炎症。主要结果是DWI上出现新的缺血性病变。结果47例患者(平均年龄65±7岁;男性44例),30例(63.8%)出现新的缺血性病变。这些患者有更高的AHA VI型斑块患病率(50.0%比17.6%,p = 0.028),更高的PET摄取(43.3%比11.8%,p = 0.026)和更高的SCAIL评分(63.3%比23.5%,p = 0.009)。新发缺血性病变最常见的分布模式是位于混合(治疗动脉内外)区域(36.2%)。在30名有新缺血性病变的参与者中,15名(50%)的病变位于外周脑区和深部脑区。在调整后的模型中,高PET摄取和SCAIL评分与新的缺血性病变独立相关(aOR = 7.26, 95% CI: 1.22, 73.59;p = 0.049, aOR = 7.06 [95% CI: 1.50, 44.18];p = 0.020)。结论颈动脉PET/ mr相关指标可有效预测颈动脉支架植入术后围手术期DWI上新发缺血性病变的风险,为早期识别复发性缺血性卒中高危患者提供重要参考。需要进一步的大规模随机对照研究来验证这些指标的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.70%
发文量
240
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics provides a medium for rapid publication of original clinical, experimental, and translational research papers, timely reviews and reports of novel findings of therapeutic relevance to the central nervous system, as well as papers related to clinical pharmacology, drug development and novel methodologies for drug evaluation. The journal focuses on neurological and psychiatric diseases such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and drug abuse.
期刊最新文献
Rapamycin Reduces Amyloid-β Plaques and Improves Behavioral Performance in a Sex-Dependent Manner in Mouse Models of Amyloidosis. MCC-135 Exerts Antiepileptic and Neuroprotective Effects by Downregulating NCX1 Expression to Decrease Intracellular Calcium Overload in the Hippocampus. Restricting Synaptotagmin-3 Internalization Mitigates Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Curtailed Neuronal Apoptosis and Microglial Re-Programming. Glymphatic System Dysfunction in Central Nervous System Diseases. SMPD1 as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Glioma Is Associated With an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1