Efficacy comparison of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and combination with PARPis or antiangiogenic agents in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Women's Health Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1186/s12905-025-03612-7
Shiya Ji, Xupeng Chen, Yebo Yu, Qiuping Jia, Xingxing Zhang, Zixin Gao
{"title":"Efficacy comparison of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and combination with PARPis or antiangiogenic agents in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Shiya Ji, Xupeng Chen, Yebo Yu, Qiuping Jia, Xingxing Zhang, Zixin Gao","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03612-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The network meta-analysis (NMA) was aimed to compare and assess the effectiveness of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/ programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy with other agents for individuals with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NMA was registered on the PROSPERO website (ID: CRD42024545968) and multiple databases were queried to retrieve the articles. It assessed the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of persons with advanced or recurrent EC, as well as those with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) in terms of PFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NMA included 12 studies involving a total of 4,515 patients. Compared to chemotherapy, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.78) in PFS, combination therapy with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) (HR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32-0.89) or with antiangiogenic agents (HR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.25-0.83) all showed significant improvements in PFS. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy resulted in a significantly higher OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.37-0.97) compared to chemotherapy. Combination therapy with antiangiogenic agents demonstrated the highest efficacy in extending PFS, while the combination with PARPis had the best performance in extending OS. Patients with dMMR and pMMR subtypes derive greater benefits from PD-1/ PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with PARPis respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and combination therapies with PARPis or antiangiogenic agents demonstrate significant potential for individuals with advanced or recurrent EC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03612-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The network meta-analysis (NMA) was aimed to compare and assess the effectiveness of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/ programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy with other agents for individuals with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods: The NMA was registered on the PROSPERO website (ID: CRD42024545968) and multiple databases were queried to retrieve the articles. It assessed the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of persons with advanced or recurrent EC, as well as those with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) in terms of PFS.

Results: The NMA included 12 studies involving a total of 4,515 patients. Compared to chemotherapy, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.78) in PFS, combination therapy with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) (HR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32-0.89) or with antiangiogenic agents (HR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.25-0.83) all showed significant improvements in PFS. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy resulted in a significantly higher OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.37-0.97) compared to chemotherapy. Combination therapy with antiangiogenic agents demonstrated the highest efficacy in extending PFS, while the combination with PARPis had the best performance in extending OS. Patients with dMMR and pMMR subtypes derive greater benefits from PD-1/ PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with PARPis respectively.

Conclusion: Monotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and combination therapies with PARPis or antiangiogenic agents demonstrate significant potential for individuals with advanced or recurrent EC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂单药与联合PARPis或抗血管生成药物治疗晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌的疗效比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
目的:网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在比较和评估程序性细胞死亡1 (PD-1)/程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)抑制剂单药治疗或与其他药物联合治疗晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌(EC)患者的有效性。方法:在PROSPERO网站(ID: CRD42024545968)上注册NMA,查询多个数据库检索文章。它评估了晚期或复发性EC患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),以及有缺陷错配修复(dMMR)和熟练错配修复(pMMR)患者的PFS。结果:NMA纳入了12项研究,共涉及4,515名患者。与化疗相比,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂单药治疗(风险比[HR], 0.59;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.44-0.78)在PFS中,与聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPis)联合治疗(HR, 0.53;95% CI: 0.32-0.89)或与抗血管生成药物(HR, 0.48;95% CI: 0.25-0.83)均显示PFS显著改善。PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂单药治疗导致OS显著升高(HR, 0.61;95% CI: 0.37-0.97)。联合抗血管生成药物延长PFS的效果最好,而联合PARPis延长OS的效果最好。dMMR和pMMR亚型患者分别从PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂单药治疗和PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合PARPis治疗中获得更大的益处。结论:PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂单药治疗和PARPis或抗血管生成药物联合治疗对晚期或复发性EC患者具有显著的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
期刊最新文献
"I feel more comfortable with a female doctor": gender preference, cultural context, and health experiences of young Syrian migrant women in Turkey. Twenty-four months progression-free survival (ongoing) for treatment of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma with surufatinib in combination with toripalimab: a case report. Uterine leiomyoma mimicking a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a diagnostic pitfall of CD117 positivity - case report and review of the literature. Preoperative pan-immune-inflammation value and geriatric nutritional risk index predict outcomes of elderly patients with endometrial carcinoma after radical surgery. Reduced age-wise disparity in estimated cervical cancer screening participation rates after applying hysterectomy correction: a population-based cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1