Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Tandem Brain Biomarker Test in the Prediction of CT Evident Brain Injury: a Prospective Evaluation in the Emergency Department.
Jemima M Curran, Katherine Onions, Jessica Watts, Arnab Rana, Emma Hughes, Jim Allison, Jamie G Cooper
{"title":"Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Tandem Brain Biomarker Test in the Prediction of CT Evident Brain Injury: a Prospective Evaluation in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Jemima M Curran, Katherine Onions, Jessica Watts, Arnab Rana, Emma Hughes, Jim Allison, Jamie G Cooper","doi":"10.1177/00045632251326483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with features of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) frequently present to the emergency department (ED) and often meet recognised criteria for CT head imaging. Observational studies suggest that use of a tandem ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) brain biomarker test may significantly reduce need for CT scanning in this population, though data on patient flow are lacking. In a prospective evaluation in a UK population with mTBI a laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP test identified 21 of 89 (24%) patients as low-risk for CT-evident TBI with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 76-100%) and NPV of 100% (95% CI 85-100%). The median time to obtain a biomarker result from venesection was 88 minutes, similar to the time from CT request to report (89 minutes). However, those 68 (76%) patients with a positive biomarker result would all have required subsequent CT imaging, significantly prolonging ED length of stay and making incorporation into clinical pathways difficult. Availability of platforms that allow measurement of UCH-L1/GFAP in whole blood at the point-of-care may circumvent these problems in the future, and permit safe rationalisation of CT imaging in this population without compromising ED patient workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"45632251326483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251326483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patients with features of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) frequently present to the emergency department (ED) and often meet recognised criteria for CT head imaging. Observational studies suggest that use of a tandem ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) brain biomarker test may significantly reduce need for CT scanning in this population, though data on patient flow are lacking. In a prospective evaluation in a UK population with mTBI a laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP test identified 21 of 89 (24%) patients as low-risk for CT-evident TBI with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 76-100%) and NPV of 100% (95% CI 85-100%). The median time to obtain a biomarker result from venesection was 88 minutes, similar to the time from CT request to report (89 minutes). However, those 68 (76%) patients with a positive biomarker result would all have required subsequent CT imaging, significantly prolonging ED length of stay and making incorporation into clinical pathways difficult. Availability of platforms that allow measurement of UCH-L1/GFAP in whole blood at the point-of-care may circumvent these problems in the future, and permit safe rationalisation of CT imaging in this population without compromising ED patient workflows.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).