ECPella 5+ in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Potential for Improved Outcomes

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2025.02.017
Nicoletta D'Ettore MD , Astrid Cardinale MD , Giulia Maj MD , Stephanie Bertolin MD , Andrea Audo MD , Andrea Montisci MD , Alina Gallo MD , Corrado Cavozza MD , Federico Pappalardo MD
{"title":"ECPella 5+ in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Potential for Improved Outcomes","authors":"Nicoletta D'Ettore MD ,&nbsp;Astrid Cardinale MD ,&nbsp;Giulia Maj MD ,&nbsp;Stephanie Bertolin MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Audo MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Montisci MD ,&nbsp;Alina Gallo MD ,&nbsp;Corrado Cavozza MD ,&nbsp;Federico Pappalardo MD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a common treatment in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) but is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The combination therapy of VA- ECMO and Impella (ECPella) results in better outcomes. Currently, multiple generations of Impella are available for use in ECPella, however limited data exist to compare devices. Here, we explored whether ECPella 5+ adds further benefit to patient outcomes. We reviewed published studies focused on ECPella in CS to summarize clinical outcomes specifically pertaining to ECPella 5+. Findings were compared to outcomes from a contemporary cohort of 10 patients admitted for cardiogenic shock and treated with ECPella 5+ between January 2022 and May 2023. We evaluated 84 studies published in Pubmed between January 2017 and October 2023. Of these, 24 articles were selected for full analysis. Use of ECPella 5+ increased over time, with more than 50% of patients receiving this configuration in studies published in 2023. Mortality rate for ECPella 5+ (reported in 5 of 24 studies) was 33% compared to 49% for all ECPella combinations. Mortality outcomes of our patient cohort were consistent with a rate of 30%. These findings suggest that Impella 5+ may further improve outcomes of ECPella. However, the interpretation is limited by the small sample size and the descriptive nature of the data. Further larger, prospective studies are needed to determine potential improvements in complication rates, VA-ECMO and inotropic therapy duration, and native heart recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"39 6","pages":"Pages 1526-1533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077025001284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a common treatment in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) but is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The combination therapy of VA- ECMO and Impella (ECPella) results in better outcomes. Currently, multiple generations of Impella are available for use in ECPella, however limited data exist to compare devices. Here, we explored whether ECPella 5+ adds further benefit to patient outcomes. We reviewed published studies focused on ECPella in CS to summarize clinical outcomes specifically pertaining to ECPella 5+. Findings were compared to outcomes from a contemporary cohort of 10 patients admitted for cardiogenic shock and treated with ECPella 5+ between January 2022 and May 2023. We evaluated 84 studies published in Pubmed between January 2017 and October 2023. Of these, 24 articles were selected for full analysis. Use of ECPella 5+ increased over time, with more than 50% of patients receiving this configuration in studies published in 2023. Mortality rate for ECPella 5+ (reported in 5 of 24 studies) was 33% compared to 49% for all ECPella combinations. Mortality outcomes of our patient cohort were consistent with a rate of 30%. These findings suggest that Impella 5+ may further improve outcomes of ECPella. However, the interpretation is limited by the small sample size and the descriptive nature of the data. Further larger, prospective studies are needed to determine potential improvements in complication rates, VA-ECMO and inotropic therapy duration, and native heart recovery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心源性休克患者的 ECPella 5+:改善预后的潜力。
使用静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)进行临时机械循环支持(MCS)是心源性休克(CS)患者的常用治疗方法,但与高发病率和死亡率相关。VA- ECMO联合Impella (ECPella)治疗效果较好。目前,已有多代Impella可用于ECPella,但用于比较设备的数据有限。在这里,我们探讨了ECPella 5+是否能进一步改善患者的预后。我们回顾了已发表的关于CS中ECPella的研究,总结了与ECPella 5+相关的临床结果。研究结果比较了2022年1月至2023年5月期间因心源性休克入院并接受ECPella 5+治疗的10例当代队列患者的结果。我们评估了2017年1月至2023年10月期间发表在Pubmed上的84项研究。从中选取24篇文章进行全面分析。ECPella 5+的使用随着时间的推移而增加,在2023年发表的研究中,超过50%的患者接受了这种配置。ECPella 5+的死亡率(24项研究中有5项报告)为33%,而所有ECPella组合的死亡率为49%。我们患者队列的死亡率结果与30%的比率一致。这些结果提示Impella 5+可能进一步改善ECPella的预后。然而,这种解释受到样本量小和数据描述性的限制。需要进一步更大规模的前瞻性研究来确定并发症发生率、VA-ECMO和肌力治疗持续时间以及原生心脏恢复的潜在改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Masthead Global Research Trends and Hotspots in Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2004 to 2024 Effects of Individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Patients Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation During Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1