Heparin Versus Bivalirudin in Pediatric Patients Assisted With Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Retrospective Before-and-after Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2025.01.041
Chiara Giorni MD , Nicoletta Cantarutti MD , Alessandro Olimpieri MD , Simona Benegni MD , Alessandra Rizza MD , Isabella Favia MD , Giovina Di Felice MD , Leonardo Vallesi MD , Gianluca Brancaccio MD , Antonio Amodeo MD , Luca Di Chiara MD , Zaccaria Ricci MD
{"title":"Heparin Versus Bivalirudin in Pediatric Patients Assisted With Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Retrospective Before-and-after Study","authors":"Chiara Giorni MD ,&nbsp;Nicoletta Cantarutti MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Olimpieri MD ,&nbsp;Simona Benegni MD ,&nbsp;Alessandra Rizza MD ,&nbsp;Isabella Favia MD ,&nbsp;Giovina Di Felice MD ,&nbsp;Leonardo Vallesi MD ,&nbsp;Gianluca Brancaccio MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Amodeo MD ,&nbsp;Luca Di Chiara MD ,&nbsp;Zaccaria Ricci MD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.01.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Children assisted with mechanical circulatory support experience bleeding and thrombotic complications that may depend upon anticoagulation strategies. The primary aim of this study was to compare the incidence of thrombotic events in pediatric heart failure patients assisted with mechanical circulatory support with the use of bivalirudin versus heparin anticoagulation.</div><div>A secondary aim was to compare the percentage of out-of-range partial thromboplastin time values between these anticoagulants.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Tertiary pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Pediatric patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support for cardiac failure.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>A total of 36 pediatric patients on mechanical support treated with either heparin (n.18) or bivalirudin (n.18) during the first 30 days of intensive care unit admission were compared. Bivalirudin group data were retrieved from February 2018 to August 2020 while data on the heparin group were extrapolated from 2015 to 2017. A comparison of anticoagulation was conducted specifically in EXCOR Berlin Heart and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Berlin Heart patients showed 1 (12.5%) versus 8 (80%) thrombotic episodes in the bivalirudin and heparin groups, respectively (p = 0.005), 0 and 3 (30%) cerebrovascular events, and 0 versus 3 (30%) death episodes, respectively (p = 0.054). In extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients, the bivalirudin and heparin groups showed 0 versus 1 (8.3%) patient with a thrombosis episode (p = 0.40), 0 and 0 cerebrovascular events, and 5 (50%) versus 3 (25%) death episodes, respectively (p = 0.169). The number of out-of-range partial thromboplastin time values was higher in the heparin group both in Berlin Heart and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients (p &lt; 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a cohort of children with heart failure, bivalirudin use was associated with a reduction in thrombotic events in Berlin Heart patients compared with heparin over a period of 30 days.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"39 5","pages":"Pages 1242-1249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077025001028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Children assisted with mechanical circulatory support experience bleeding and thrombotic complications that may depend upon anticoagulation strategies. The primary aim of this study was to compare the incidence of thrombotic events in pediatric heart failure patients assisted with mechanical circulatory support with the use of bivalirudin versus heparin anticoagulation.
A secondary aim was to compare the percentage of out-of-range partial thromboplastin time values between these anticoagulants.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.

Participants

Pediatric patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support for cardiac failure.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and Main Results

A total of 36 pediatric patients on mechanical support treated with either heparin (n.18) or bivalirudin (n.18) during the first 30 days of intensive care unit admission were compared. Bivalirudin group data were retrieved from February 2018 to August 2020 while data on the heparin group were extrapolated from 2015 to 2017. A comparison of anticoagulation was conducted specifically in EXCOR Berlin Heart and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Berlin Heart patients showed 1 (12.5%) versus 8 (80%) thrombotic episodes in the bivalirudin and heparin groups, respectively (p = 0.005), 0 and 3 (30%) cerebrovascular events, and 0 versus 3 (30%) death episodes, respectively (p = 0.054). In extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients, the bivalirudin and heparin groups showed 0 versus 1 (8.3%) patient with a thrombosis episode (p = 0.40), 0 and 0 cerebrovascular events, and 5 (50%) versus 3 (25%) death episodes, respectively (p = 0.169). The number of out-of-range partial thromboplastin time values was higher in the heparin group both in Berlin Heart and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

In a cohort of children with heart failure, bivalirudin use was associated with a reduction in thrombotic events in Berlin Heart patients compared with heparin over a period of 30 days.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝素与比伐卢定在接受机械循环支持的儿科患者中的应用:一项前后回顾性研究。
目的:儿童辅助机械循环支持经验出血和血栓形成并发症可能取决于抗凝策略。本研究的主要目的是比较在机械循环支持下使用比伐鲁定和肝素抗凝的儿童心力衰竭患者血栓事件的发生率。第二个目的是比较这些抗凝剂之间超出范围的部分凝血活酶时间值的百分比。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:三级儿科心脏重症监护病房。参与者:接受心脏衰竭机械循环支持的儿科患者。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:在重症监护病房入院的前30天内,共有36名接受肝素(n.18)或比伐芦定(n.18)机械支持治疗的儿科患者进行了比较。比伐鲁定组数据检索自2018年2月至2020年8月,而肝素组数据推断自2015年至2017年。对EXCOR柏林心脏和体外膜氧合患者的抗凝效果进行了比较。柏林心脏患者在比伐鲁定组和肝素组分别出现1次(12.5%)和8次(80%)血栓形成事件(p = 0.005), 0次和3次(30%)脑血管事件,0次和3次(30%)死亡事件(p = 0.054)。在体外膜氧合患者中,比伐鲁定组和肝素组分别有0例和1例(8.3%)患者发生血栓事件(p = 0.40), 0例和0例脑血管事件,5例(50%)和3例(25%)死亡事件(p = 0.169)。在柏林心脏和体外膜氧合患者中,肝素组的部分凝血活酶时间值超出范围的数量更高(p < 0.0001)。结论:在一组患有心力衰竭的儿童中,与肝素相比,在30天的时间内,比伐鲁定的使用与柏林心脏患者血栓事件的减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Masthead Global Research Trends and Hotspots in Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2004 to 2024 Effects of Individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Patients Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation During Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1