["Ultimately, you are on your own." A qualitative analysis of barriers to health care from the perspective of patients with long COVID].

Sabine Hammer, Clara Monaca, Annika Hoelz, Markus Tannheimer, Saskia Huckels- Baumgart, Kathrin Dornieden, Dagmar Lüttel, Marcus Rall, Hardy Müller
{"title":"[\"Ultimately, you are on your own.\" A qualitative analysis of barriers to health care from the perspective of patients with long COVID].","authors":"Sabine Hammer, Clara Monaca, Annika Hoelz, Markus Tannheimer, Saskia Huckels- Baumgart, Kathrin Dornieden, Dagmar Lüttel, Marcus Rall, Hardy Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About 5% of the population are affected by post-infectious symptoms after a Sars-CoV-2-infection. Long COVID or a post-COVID-19 condition can affect all organ systems and lead to a complete need for care. 10-50% of patients meet the diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Treatment recommendations have so far been limited to stress management and symptomatic, psychological or activity-enhancing measures (physical or exercise therapy). Initial studies of patients' perspectives indicate that both the recognition of the disease and the medical care for affected patients are insufficient.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Since June 2023, patients with long COVID or their relatives have been able to report medical and social care experiences by telephone or using an online reporting form from the Techniker (TK) Health Insurance fund and the German Society for Patient Safety as part of a project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health. From 1,216 reports received by December 2023, 264 representative cases were selected and evaluated using structuring and summarizing content analysis. The aim was to understand the experiences of those affected with barriers to health and social care and their consequences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the fourth year after the start of the pandemic, there is a lack of care structures and competence on the part of all care service providers, according to those affected. Special outpatient clinics for post-viral syndromes are either not accessible for the majority of participants or do not accept new patients or have waiting times of up to two years. Aside from the fact that there are currently no causally effective treatments for post-viral syndromes, 85% of those surveyed report that medical or social contacts are not sufficiently informed about the clinical picture. 80% of participants report that their symptoms are not acknowledged by employees in the health and social care sector, or they are considered a psychological issue. As a result, patients receive no or incorrect treatment and/or do not receive appropriate social care. 56% report a deterioration in their health status caused by prescribed or recommended examinations or treatments. The psychologization of post-viral symptoms is described as stigmatizing and considered the main cause of the precarious care situation of those affected by long COVID.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study shows that there are currently no adequate care concepts and structures for post-infectious illnesses and that activating therapies, mostly in connection with the assumption of a psychosomatic origin, lead to significant malpractice. The finding that the majority of respondents feel weakened, ashamed or harmed by their physicians is particularly dramatic. The data also provide evidence of systematic stigmatization and discrimination against those affected. The generalizability of the results is limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To ensure adequate medical and social care for patients with long COVID, rapid training and further education of all those involved, the development and expansion of specific care offerings as well as a monitoring of health care provision are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: About 5% of the population are affected by post-infectious symptoms after a Sars-CoV-2-infection. Long COVID or a post-COVID-19 condition can affect all organ systems and lead to a complete need for care. 10-50% of patients meet the diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Treatment recommendations have so far been limited to stress management and symptomatic, psychological or activity-enhancing measures (physical or exercise therapy). Initial studies of patients' perspectives indicate that both the recognition of the disease and the medical care for affected patients are insufficient.

Method: Since June 2023, patients with long COVID or their relatives have been able to report medical and social care experiences by telephone or using an online reporting form from the Techniker (TK) Health Insurance fund and the German Society for Patient Safety as part of a project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health. From 1,216 reports received by December 2023, 264 representative cases were selected and evaluated using structuring and summarizing content analysis. The aim was to understand the experiences of those affected with barriers to health and social care and their consequences.

Results: In the fourth year after the start of the pandemic, there is a lack of care structures and competence on the part of all care service providers, according to those affected. Special outpatient clinics for post-viral syndromes are either not accessible for the majority of participants or do not accept new patients or have waiting times of up to two years. Aside from the fact that there are currently no causally effective treatments for post-viral syndromes, 85% of those surveyed report that medical or social contacts are not sufficiently informed about the clinical picture. 80% of participants report that their symptoms are not acknowledged by employees in the health and social care sector, or they are considered a psychological issue. As a result, patients receive no or incorrect treatment and/or do not receive appropriate social care. 56% report a deterioration in their health status caused by prescribed or recommended examinations or treatments. The psychologization of post-viral symptoms is described as stigmatizing and considered the main cause of the precarious care situation of those affected by long COVID.

Discussion: The study shows that there are currently no adequate care concepts and structures for post-infectious illnesses and that activating therapies, mostly in connection with the assumption of a psychosomatic origin, lead to significant malpractice. The finding that the majority of respondents feel weakened, ashamed or harmed by their physicians is particularly dramatic. The data also provide evidence of systematic stigmatization and discrimination against those affected. The generalizability of the results is limited.

Conclusions: To ensure adequate medical and social care for patients with long COVID, rapid training and further education of all those involved, the development and expansion of specific care offerings as well as a monitoring of health care provision are urgently needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
[How can we support medical residents and lateral entrants into general practice during the transition from the inpatient to the outpatient setting? A qualitative interview study]. The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic in general practices compared to pre-pandemic times: Longitudinal questionnaire survey among general practitioners and medical practice assistants in Germany on how the pandemic shaped everyday care. [Real-world data for comparative effectiveness research: Taking stock of available data sources in Germany with special regard to registries]. [Requirements and possible solutions for practice-relevant nursing research in acute care in Germany: Results of a scoping workshop]. [The importance of the right to opt for specialized vocational qualifications in general nursing training from the perspectives of vocational trainers and trainees - Results of an accompanying mixed methods research study].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1