Assessing the transferability potential of policy practices for older people.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Archives of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1186/s13690-025-01548-w
Mihaela Ghența, Aniela Matei, Franziska Rothe, Marja Aartsen, Iuliana Precupetu
{"title":"Assessing the transferability potential of policy practices for older people.","authors":"Mihaela Ghența, Aniela Matei, Franziska Rothe, Marja Aartsen, Iuliana Precupetu","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01548-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Policies in the fields of health and long-term care are constantly under pressure to ensure the balance between economic stability and an adequate quality of life for all the citizens in need, while policy makers are engaged in finding the most adequate responses to population ageing concerns. Demographic changes create multiple concerns to which policy makers and practitioners need to develop interventions. The aim of this paper is to assess the transferability potential of selected best practices from Norway to Romania in order to increase the social inclusion of older people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This approach comprises a mixture of methods. It uses a SWOT analysis to select best practices and a Policy Delphi methodology with experts in relevant fields of social policy for older people (health and long-term care) to assess the transferability potential of those best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggest that the transferability of best practices is closely linked to the national context.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The transferability of best practices from one national context to another is an effective way to advance social policies for older persons, provided that the economic, social, political and cultural circumstances are considered. The results highlight the need for change in the development of policy measures for the selected domains of social policy. To create such change, policy makers should consider the level of development of health and long-term care systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01548-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Policies in the fields of health and long-term care are constantly under pressure to ensure the balance between economic stability and an adequate quality of life for all the citizens in need, while policy makers are engaged in finding the most adequate responses to population ageing concerns. Demographic changes create multiple concerns to which policy makers and practitioners need to develop interventions. The aim of this paper is to assess the transferability potential of selected best practices from Norway to Romania in order to increase the social inclusion of older people.

Methods: This approach comprises a mixture of methods. It uses a SWOT analysis to select best practices and a Policy Delphi methodology with experts in relevant fields of social policy for older people (health and long-term care) to assess the transferability potential of those best practices.

Results: The results suggest that the transferability of best practices is closely linked to the national context.

Conclusions: The transferability of best practices from one national context to another is an effective way to advance social policies for older persons, provided that the economic, social, political and cultural circumstances are considered. The results highlight the need for change in the development of policy measures for the selected domains of social policy. To create such change, policy makers should consider the level of development of health and long-term care systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the transferability potential of policy practices for older people. Healthy ageing for older adult people with intellectual disability: a scoping review. Analysis of factors influencing attrition among clinical traditional Chinese medical major graduates: based on a discrete choice experiment. Between intention and action: the paradoxes of female vaccination. Usability of technological tools to overcome language barriers in healthcare- a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1