Editorial Commentary: Imaging Results in Data Usefully Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning

Mark P. Cote D.P.T., M.S.C.T.R. (Deputy Editor, Statistics), Alireza Gholipour Ph.D.
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Imaging Results in Data Usefully Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning","authors":"Mark P. Cote D.P.T., M.S.C.T.R. (Deputy Editor, Statistics),&nbsp;Alireza Gholipour Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many artificial intelligence machine learning studies focused on clinical outcomes use registry data inadequate for predictive modeling. In contrast, diagnostic imaging is an area where available information (pixels, etc.) can result in a reliable, clinically relevant, and accurate model. The use of deep learning for image analysis can reduce interobserver variability and highlight subtle and meaningful features. Artificial intelligence augments, rather than replaces, clinical expertise, allowing faster, more consistent, and potentially more accurate diagnostic information. This is especially relevant when imaging data are abundant, as continuous model training can further refine diagnostic precision. An effective 3-step approach includes (1) an efficient “detector” to determine where to look, (2) computational ability to focus on key features of the image and “blur out” background noise (“attention module”), and (3) interpreted key features (“explainability”). Next, the larger process of developing and employing a predictive model needs to be externally validated to determine the extent to which these results will generalize outside a single institution. Outside this setting (i.e., external validity) needs to be determined.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 8","pages":"Pages 2717-2719"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325001458","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many artificial intelligence machine learning studies focused on clinical outcomes use registry data inadequate for predictive modeling. In contrast, diagnostic imaging is an area where available information (pixels, etc.) can result in a reliable, clinically relevant, and accurate model. The use of deep learning for image analysis can reduce interobserver variability and highlight subtle and meaningful features. Artificial intelligence augments, rather than replaces, clinical expertise, allowing faster, more consistent, and potentially more accurate diagnostic information. This is especially relevant when imaging data are abundant, as continuous model training can further refine diagnostic precision. An effective 3-step approach includes (1) an efficient “detector” to determine where to look, (2) computational ability to focus on key features of the image and “blur out” background noise (“attention module”), and (3) interpreted key features (“explainability”). Next, the larger process of developing and employing a predictive model needs to be externally validated to determine the extent to which these results will generalize outside a single institution. Outside this setting (i.e., external validity) needs to be determined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过人工智能机器学习有效分析数据的成像结果。
许多关注临床结果的人工智能(AI)机器学习(ML)论文所使用的登记数据不足以进行预测建模。相比之下,诊断成像领域的可用信息(像素等)可生成可靠、临床相关且准确的模型。使用深度学习进行图像分析可以减少观察者之间的差异,并突出微妙而有意义的特征。人工智能可以增强而不是取代临床专业知识,从而提供更快、更一致、更准确的诊断信息。在成像数据丰富的情况下,这一点尤为重要,因为持续的模型训练可以进一步提高诊断的精确度。有效的三步法包括1) 一个高效的 "探测器",以确定观察的位置;2) 计算能力,以关注图像的关键特征并 "模糊 "背景噪音("关注模块");3) 解释关键特征("可解释性")。接下来,开发和使用预测模型的大过程需要经过外部验证,以确定这些结果在多大程度上能在单一机构之外推广。在这种情况下,需要确定外部有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Instructions for Authors Announcements Masthead Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1