A meta-analysis of the association of death anxiety with psychological distress and psychopathology

IF 15.9 1区 心理学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Nature Human Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1038/s41562-025-02115-7
Elisa P. Dumitru, Roxana A. I. Cardoș, Ion Milea, Filippo Gambarota, Gianmarco Altoè, Daniel O. David, Ioana A. Cristea
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the association of death anxiety with psychological distress and psychopathology","authors":"Elisa P. Dumitru, Roxana A. I. Cardoș, Ion Milea, Filippo Gambarota, Gianmarco Altoè, Daniel O. David, Ioana A. Cristea","doi":"10.1038/s41562-025-02115-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Death anxiety (DA), apprehension when thinking about death, has long been associated with distress. Studies have suggested that DA may transdiagnostically contribute to mental disorders. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, aiming to estimate the relationship between DA and distress or symptoms of mental disorders. The included studies reported the correlation between DA and distress or symptoms of mental disorders, across general population and clinical samples, using previously validated measures for all outcomes. PsychInfo and the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection (via EBSCO), Embase, and Medline (via PubMed) were systematically searched up to 30 October 2023. Study quality was evaluated with the Study Quality Assessment Tools (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute). A total of 129 studies were included, reporting on 158 independent samples, for a total of 34,147 participants. Most studies were rated as poor quality. The findings indicated consistently positive associations between DA and distress outcomes (general anxiety: r = 0.42, P < 0.001; depression: r = 0.41, P < 0.001; distress: r = 0.36, P < 0.001). Heterogeneity was substantial, and prediction intervals crossed zero for all outcomes, except for anxiety and distress. We found no moderation by DA measure, sample type or the proportion of women in the sample. However, the association was stronger (t(35.37) = −2.055, P = 0.047) when medical conditions were present (r = 0.48, P < 0.001) than when they were absent (r = 0.37, P < 0.001). There was evidence of small-study effects, indicating possible publication bias. DA should be investigated in longitudinal studies across diverse samples of patients to clarify its contribution to psychopathology. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the relationship between death anxiety and distress or symptoms of mental disorders. The findings suggest consistently positive associations between death anxiety and distress outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19074,"journal":{"name":"Nature Human Behaviour","volume":"9 5","pages":"933-943"},"PeriodicalIF":15.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Human Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02115-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Death anxiety (DA), apprehension when thinking about death, has long been associated with distress. Studies have suggested that DA may transdiagnostically contribute to mental disorders. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, aiming to estimate the relationship between DA and distress or symptoms of mental disorders. The included studies reported the correlation between DA and distress or symptoms of mental disorders, across general population and clinical samples, using previously validated measures for all outcomes. PsychInfo and the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection (via EBSCO), Embase, and Medline (via PubMed) were systematically searched up to 30 October 2023. Study quality was evaluated with the Study Quality Assessment Tools (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute). A total of 129 studies were included, reporting on 158 independent samples, for a total of 34,147 participants. Most studies were rated as poor quality. The findings indicated consistently positive associations between DA and distress outcomes (general anxiety: r = 0.42, P < 0.001; depression: r = 0.41, P < 0.001; distress: r = 0.36, P < 0.001). Heterogeneity was substantial, and prediction intervals crossed zero for all outcomes, except for anxiety and distress. We found no moderation by DA measure, sample type or the proportion of women in the sample. However, the association was stronger (t(35.37) = −2.055, P = 0.047) when medical conditions were present (r = 0.48, P < 0.001) than when they were absent (r = 0.37, P < 0.001). There was evidence of small-study effects, indicating possible publication bias. DA should be investigated in longitudinal studies across diverse samples of patients to clarify its contribution to psychopathology. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the relationship between death anxiety and distress or symptoms of mental disorders. The findings suggest consistently positive associations between death anxiety and distress outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死亡焦虑与心理困扰和精神病理关系的荟萃分析
死亡焦虑(DA),当想到死亡时的恐惧,长期以来一直与痛苦有关。研究表明,DA可能会导致精神障碍。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,旨在估计DA与精神障碍的痛苦或症状之间的关系。纳入的研究报告了一般人群和临床样本中DA与痛苦或精神障碍症状之间的相关性,使用了先前验证的所有结果测量方法。系统检索到2023年10月30日为止的PsychInfo和心理学与行为科学Collection(通过EBSCO)、Embase和Medline(通过PubMed)。使用研究质量评估工具(国家心脏、肺和血液研究所)评估研究质量。总共纳入了129项研究,报告了158个独立样本,总共有34147名参与者。大多数研究被评为质量差。研究结果表明,DA与痛苦结局之间存在一致的正相关(一般焦虑:r = 0.42, P < 0.001;抑郁症:r = 0.41, P < 0.001;distress: r = 0.36, P < 0.001)。异质性显著,除焦虑和痛苦外,所有结果的预测区间均为零。我们没有发现DA测量、样本类型或样本中女性比例的缓和。然而,当医疗条件存在时(r = 0.48, P < 0.001),与不存在医疗条件时(r = 0.37, P < 0.001)相比,相关性更强(t(35.37) = - 2.055, P = 0.047)。有证据表明存在小规模研究效应,表明可能存在发表偏倚。应在不同患者样本的纵向研究中调查DA,以阐明其对精神病理学的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Human Behaviour
Nature Human Behaviour Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
36.80
自引率
1.00%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Nature Human Behaviour is a journal that focuses on publishing research of outstanding significance into any aspect of human behavior.The research can cover various areas such as psychological, biological, and social bases of human behavior.It also includes the study of origins, development, and disorders related to human behavior.The primary aim of the journal is to increase the visibility of research in the field and enhance its societal reach and impact.
期刊最新文献
Integrating behavioural experimental findings into dynamical models to inform social change interventions The value of living systematic reviews. Optimized feature gains explain and predict successes and failures of human selective listening The effects of Facebook and Instagram political advertisements on the 2020 US election. Behavioural genetics must prioritize communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1