Efficacy of the U-shaped flap technique in preventing reflux after minimally invasive proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1002/ags3.12864
Takeshi Omori, Hisashi Hara, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Naoki Shinno, Yasunori Masuike, Takashi Kanemura, Hiroshi Wada, Masayoshi Yasui, Masayuki Ohue, Hiroshi Miyata
{"title":"Efficacy of the U-shaped flap technique in preventing reflux after minimally invasive proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer","authors":"Takeshi Omori,&nbsp;Hisashi Hara,&nbsp;Yoshitomo Yanagimoto,&nbsp;Naoki Shinno,&nbsp;Yasunori Masuike,&nbsp;Takashi Kanemura,&nbsp;Hiroshi Wada,&nbsp;Masayoshi Yasui,&nbsp;Masayuki Ohue,&nbsp;Hiroshi Miyata","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Preventing gastroesophageal reflux after proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer remains challenging due to the lack of standardized reconstructive techniques. The double flap technique (DFT) in valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy prevents reflux esophagitis but is less effective in esophagogastric junction cancer because of negative pressure on the inferior mediastinum. We developed the U-shaped flap technique (UFT) to enhance the anti-reflux efficacy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study analyzed data from patients who underwent minimally invasive proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer between August 2014 and May 2022, using a prospectively maintained database. We compared DFT and UFT for short- and long-term outcomes, focusing on gastroesophageal reflux, using one-to-one propensity score matching to control for patient-related variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 217 eligible patients, 205 (100 in DFT, 105 in UFT) completed a 1-year follow-up. After propensity score matching, we selected 42 pairs of patients who underwent DFT and UFT. UFT had significantly shorter operative time (<i>p</i> = 0.044), similar blood loss, and similar morbidity. The UFT group had significantly fewer reflux symptoms (0% vs. 14.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.0011) and endoscopic Los Angeles grade B or higher reflux esophagitis (0% vs. 14.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.0011) than the DFT group. In lower mediastinal reconstructions for esophagogastric junction cancer, UFT showed a reduced incidence of reflux esophagitis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study indicates that the U-shaped flap technique (UFT) offered significant advantages in reducing postoperative reflux symptoms and endoscopic esophagitis, in a cohort of patients with proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 2","pages":"251-262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12864","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preventing gastroesophageal reflux after proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer remains challenging due to the lack of standardized reconstructive techniques. The double flap technique (DFT) in valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy prevents reflux esophagitis but is less effective in esophagogastric junction cancer because of negative pressure on the inferior mediastinum. We developed the U-shaped flap technique (UFT) to enhance the anti-reflux efficacy.

Methods

This study analyzed data from patients who underwent minimally invasive proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer between August 2014 and May 2022, using a prospectively maintained database. We compared DFT and UFT for short- and long-term outcomes, focusing on gastroesophageal reflux, using one-to-one propensity score matching to control for patient-related variables.

Results

Among 217 eligible patients, 205 (100 in DFT, 105 in UFT) completed a 1-year follow-up. After propensity score matching, we selected 42 pairs of patients who underwent DFT and UFT. UFT had significantly shorter operative time (p = 0.044), similar blood loss, and similar morbidity. The UFT group had significantly fewer reflux symptoms (0% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.0011) and endoscopic Los Angeles grade B or higher reflux esophagitis (0% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.0011) than the DFT group. In lower mediastinal reconstructions for esophagogastric junction cancer, UFT showed a reduced incidence of reflux esophagitis.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that the U-shaped flap technique (UFT) offered significant advantages in reducing postoperative reflux symptoms and endoscopic esophagitis, in a cohort of patients with proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Clinical impact of low fornix perfusion on devascularized whole stomach as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy Issue Information Acknowledgments Palliative management for malignant biliary obstruction and gastric outlet obstruction from pancreatic cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1