Lavage cytology diagnosed by immunostaining may be a poor prognostic factor in pathological stage III colorectal cancer

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/ags3.12863
Akitoshi Nankaku, Yusuke Yamaoka, Akio Shiomi, Hiroyasu Kagawa, Shoichi Manabe, Takuma Oishi, Kiyoshi Tone, Akifumi Notsu, Yusuke Kinugasa
{"title":"Lavage cytology diagnosed by immunostaining may be a poor prognostic factor in pathological stage III colorectal cancer","authors":"Akitoshi Nankaku,&nbsp;Yusuke Yamaoka,&nbsp;Akio Shiomi,&nbsp;Hiroyasu Kagawa,&nbsp;Shoichi Manabe,&nbsp;Takuma Oishi,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Tone,&nbsp;Akifumi Notsu,&nbsp;Yusuke Kinugasa","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To clarify the prognostic impact of positive lavage cytology diagnosed by immunostaining on long-term outcomes following curative resection for pathological stage III colorectal cancer (CRC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively investigated patients who underwent radical resection and intraoperative lavage cytology (LCY) simultaneously for pathological stage III primary CRC between 2005 and 2017. All LCY specimens were evaluated by Papanicolaou staining and immunostaining for carcinoembryonic antigen and Ber-EP4. Only Class V diagnosed by either staining method was defined as positive LCY, and patients were classified into two groups: a positive lavage cytology (LCY+) group; and a negative lavage cytology (LCY−) group. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinicopathological factors affecting OS and RFS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 708 patients with pathological stage III CRC, 30 patients (4.2%) showed positive LCY. OS and RFS were significantly lower in the LCY(+) group than in the LCY(−) group. Five-y OS rates in the LCY(+) and LCY(−) groups were 58.7% and 91.0%, respectively, and 5-y RFS rates were 28.8% and 76.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that positive LCY was independently associated with lower OS and RFS. In the LCY(+) group, the proportion of patients with negative Papanicolaou staining but positive immunostaining was 20.0% (6 of 30). No significant differences in OS and RFS were evident between those patients and patients with positive results for both Papanicolaou staining and immunostaining.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Positive LCY as diagnosed by immunostaining may represent a poor prognostic factor for pathological stage III CRC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 2","pages":"271-280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12863","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12863","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To clarify the prognostic impact of positive lavage cytology diagnosed by immunostaining on long-term outcomes following curative resection for pathological stage III colorectal cancer (CRC).

Method

We retrospectively investigated patients who underwent radical resection and intraoperative lavage cytology (LCY) simultaneously for pathological stage III primary CRC between 2005 and 2017. All LCY specimens were evaluated by Papanicolaou staining and immunostaining for carcinoembryonic antigen and Ber-EP4. Only Class V diagnosed by either staining method was defined as positive LCY, and patients were classified into two groups: a positive lavage cytology (LCY+) group; and a negative lavage cytology (LCY−) group. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinicopathological factors affecting OS and RFS.

Results

Among 708 patients with pathological stage III CRC, 30 patients (4.2%) showed positive LCY. OS and RFS were significantly lower in the LCY(+) group than in the LCY(−) group. Five-y OS rates in the LCY(+) and LCY(−) groups were 58.7% and 91.0%, respectively, and 5-y RFS rates were 28.8% and 76.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that positive LCY was independently associated with lower OS and RFS. In the LCY(+) group, the proportion of patients with negative Papanicolaou staining but positive immunostaining was 20.0% (6 of 30). No significant differences in OS and RFS were evident between those patients and patients with positive results for both Papanicolaou staining and immunostaining.

Conclusion

Positive LCY as diagnosed by immunostaining may represent a poor prognostic factor for pathological stage III CRC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过免疫染色诊断的浸液细胞学可能是病理Ⅲ期结直肠癌的不良预后因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Clinical impact of low fornix perfusion on devascularized whole stomach as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy Issue Information Acknowledgments Palliative management for malignant biliary obstruction and gastric outlet obstruction from pancreatic cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1