The effectiveness of immersive virtual reality on the psychology of older adults: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General hospital psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.02.024
Zhilan Ke , Meng Wei , Fen Yang , Yufei Qiu , Xinhong Zhu , Xiaolian Gao , Jing Zhou , Guiyuan Qiao
{"title":"The effectiveness of immersive virtual reality on the psychology of older adults: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Zhilan Ke ,&nbsp;Meng Wei ,&nbsp;Fen Yang ,&nbsp;Yufei Qiu ,&nbsp;Xinhong Zhu ,&nbsp;Xiaolian Gao ,&nbsp;Jing Zhou ,&nbsp;Guiyuan Qiao","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.02.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The increasing prevalence of psychological issues among older adults is a significant public health concern. Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) is being investigated and tested as a potential intervention tool for addressing these issues.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This review aims to assess the effectiveness of IVR devices in enhancing the psychological well-being of older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to January 24, 2024. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials, version 2, was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies and determine the levels of evidence for the outcomes. Results are reported as Standardized Mean Differences (SMDs) with 95 % Confidence Intervals (CIs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The primary outcomes of this review were depression and anxiety, with psychological well-being as the secondary outcome. Among the 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included (<em>n</em> = 15), for overall methodological quality, 1 study showed high risk, 6 studies showed some concerns and 8 studies showed low risk. A total of 802 older adults participated across the studies. Compared with control groups, IVR intervention was more effective in reducing depression (SMD -0.608, 95 % CI -0.900 ∼ −0.315, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), anxiety (SMD -0.708, 95 % CI -1.119 ∼ −0.297, <em>P</em> = 0.001), and more effective in improving psychological well-being (SMD 0.641, 95 % CI 0.068–1.214, <em>P</em> = 0.028).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>IVR has the potential to improve the psychological health of older adults and may be widely applicable in promoting successful aging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"94 ","pages":"Pages 86-96"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325000544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The increasing prevalence of psychological issues among older adults is a significant public health concern. Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) is being investigated and tested as a potential intervention tool for addressing these issues.

Objective

This review aims to assess the effectiveness of IVR devices in enhancing the psychological well-being of older adults.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to January 24, 2024. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials, version 2, was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies and determine the levels of evidence for the outcomes. Results are reported as Standardized Mean Differences (SMDs) with 95 % Confidence Intervals (CIs).

Results

The primary outcomes of this review were depression and anxiety, with psychological well-being as the secondary outcome. Among the 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included (n = 15), for overall methodological quality, 1 study showed high risk, 6 studies showed some concerns and 8 studies showed low risk. A total of 802 older adults participated across the studies. Compared with control groups, IVR intervention was more effective in reducing depression (SMD -0.608, 95 % CI -0.900 ∼ −0.315, P < 0.001), anxiety (SMD -0.708, 95 % CI -1.119 ∼ −0.297, P = 0.001), and more effective in improving psychological well-being (SMD 0.641, 95 % CI 0.068–1.214, P = 0.028).

Conclusions

IVR has the potential to improve the psychological health of older adults and may be widely applicable in promoting successful aging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of gut microbiota and depression and anxiety: Mendelian randomization from three datasets Trajectories of depressive symptoms and the risk of cardiovascular, dementia, and pulmonary events in older adults: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing The association between anhedonia and speech features in depression: A cross-sectional study Mortality among veterans with serious mental illness who were lost to VHA care “Suicide prevention and substance use: The need for integrative and mechanism-informed interventions”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1