Defining Clinically Meaningful Thresholds for 12-Month Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty; Toward Improving Threshold Accuracy

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Today Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2025.101649
Julia E.J.W. Geilen MD , Thomay-Claire A. Hoelen MSc , Martijn G.M. Schotanus PhD , Wouter L.W. van Hemert MD, PhD , Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren MSc , Bert Boonen MD, PhD , Jasper Most PhD
{"title":"Defining Clinically Meaningful Thresholds for 12-Month Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty; Toward Improving Threshold Accuracy","authors":"Julia E.J.W. Geilen MD ,&nbsp;Thomay-Claire A. Hoelen MSc ,&nbsp;Martijn G.M. Schotanus PhD ,&nbsp;Wouter L.W. van Hemert MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren MSc ,&nbsp;Bert Boonen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jasper Most PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinically meaningful thresholds for patient-reported outcomes are relevant to define and predict success of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Defining and offering thresholds must consider preoperative symptom severity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective study of 40,213 primary total hip replacements registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2016-2018), receiver operating curve analysis was used to define minimal clinically important changes and patient-acceptable symptom states with the anchor transition in function. Subgroups were identified for which independent thresholds should be defined. Patient-reported outcome measures were symptoms (pain, Oxford Hip Score [OHS], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and quality of life (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3L questionnaire).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>94.6% completed the anchor questions, of whom 80.1% reporting “much improved function” 1 year after surgery. Discriminative abilities of thresholds were not good (area under the curve &lt; 0.8). Tercile-specific determination of thresholds improved discrimination and reliability (+10%). Minimal clinically important change values were higher for all outcomes (eg, change in OHS ≥ 24.5 vs ≥ 10.5) in patients with more severe preoperative symptoms. Patient-acceptable symptom state scores for European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions index (≥ 0.809) and OHS (≥ 40.5) showed good discrimination (area under the curve &gt; 0.8). Patients with less symptoms required lower postoperative scores for reporting “much improved function” (postoperative OHS ≥ 38.5 vs 42.5). Tercile-specific thresholds did not improve accuracy of thresholds (Cohens kappa 42%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The present study demonstrates that patients with more severe preoperative symptoms require greater change scores to achieve clinically relevant improvements than patients with less severe preoperative symptoms. This study suggests that current one-size-fits-all thresholds for success of THA should be replaced with more nuanced thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level III, Therapeutic Study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125000366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clinically meaningful thresholds for patient-reported outcomes are relevant to define and predict success of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Defining and offering thresholds must consider preoperative symptom severity.

Methods

In this retrospective study of 40,213 primary total hip replacements registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2016-2018), receiver operating curve analysis was used to define minimal clinically important changes and patient-acceptable symptom states with the anchor transition in function. Subgroups were identified for which independent thresholds should be defined. Patient-reported outcome measures were symptoms (pain, Oxford Hip Score [OHS], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and quality of life (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3L questionnaire).

Results

94.6% completed the anchor questions, of whom 80.1% reporting “much improved function” 1 year after surgery. Discriminative abilities of thresholds were not good (area under the curve < 0.8). Tercile-specific determination of thresholds improved discrimination and reliability (+10%). Minimal clinically important change values were higher for all outcomes (eg, change in OHS ≥ 24.5 vs ≥ 10.5) in patients with more severe preoperative symptoms. Patient-acceptable symptom state scores for European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions index (≥ 0.809) and OHS (≥ 40.5) showed good discrimination (area under the curve > 0.8). Patients with less symptoms required lower postoperative scores for reporting “much improved function” (postoperative OHS ≥ 38.5 vs 42.5). Tercile-specific thresholds did not improve accuracy of thresholds (Cohens kappa 42%).

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that patients with more severe preoperative symptoms require greater change scores to achieve clinically relevant improvements than patients with less severe preoperative symptoms. This study suggests that current one-size-fits-all thresholds for success of THA should be replaced with more nuanced thresholds.

Level of evidence

Level III, Therapeutic Study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Suction-Powered Intramedullary Bone Debridement Technology Compared to Conventional Curettage in Infected Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Direct Anterior Versus Mini Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Removal of Loose Bodies From the Posterior Aspect of the Knee During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Technical Note Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patient Perceptions of Nutrition in the Perioperative Episode of Care Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Patient With Achondroplasia: Challenges and Surgical Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1