Julia E.J.W. Geilen MD , Thomay-Claire A. Hoelen MSc , Martijn G.M. Schotanus PhD , Wouter L.W. van Hemert MD, PhD , Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren MSc , Bert Boonen MD, PhD , Jasper Most PhD
{"title":"Defining Clinically Meaningful Thresholds for 12-Month Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty; Toward Improving Threshold Accuracy","authors":"Julia E.J.W. Geilen MD , Thomay-Claire A. Hoelen MSc , Martijn G.M. Schotanus PhD , Wouter L.W. van Hemert MD, PhD , Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren MSc , Bert Boonen MD, PhD , Jasper Most PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinically meaningful thresholds for patient-reported outcomes are relevant to define and predict success of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Defining and offering thresholds must consider preoperative symptom severity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective study of 40,213 primary total hip replacements registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2016-2018), receiver operating curve analysis was used to define minimal clinically important changes and patient-acceptable symptom states with the anchor transition in function. Subgroups were identified for which independent thresholds should be defined. Patient-reported outcome measures were symptoms (pain, Oxford Hip Score [OHS], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and quality of life (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3L questionnaire).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>94.6% completed the anchor questions, of whom 80.1% reporting “much improved function” 1 year after surgery. Discriminative abilities of thresholds were not good (area under the curve < 0.8). Tercile-specific determination of thresholds improved discrimination and reliability (+10%). Minimal clinically important change values were higher for all outcomes (eg, change in OHS ≥ 24.5 vs ≥ 10.5) in patients with more severe preoperative symptoms. Patient-acceptable symptom state scores for European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions index (≥ 0.809) and OHS (≥ 40.5) showed good discrimination (area under the curve > 0.8). Patients with less symptoms required lower postoperative scores for reporting “much improved function” (postoperative OHS ≥ 38.5 vs 42.5). Tercile-specific thresholds did not improve accuracy of thresholds (Cohens kappa 42%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The present study demonstrates that patients with more severe preoperative symptoms require greater change scores to achieve clinically relevant improvements than patients with less severe preoperative symptoms. This study suggests that current one-size-fits-all thresholds for success of THA should be replaced with more nuanced thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level III, Therapeutic Study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101649"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125000366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Clinically meaningful thresholds for patient-reported outcomes are relevant to define and predict success of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Defining and offering thresholds must consider preoperative symptom severity.
Methods
In this retrospective study of 40,213 primary total hip replacements registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2016-2018), receiver operating curve analysis was used to define minimal clinically important changes and patient-acceptable symptom states with the anchor transition in function. Subgroups were identified for which independent thresholds should be defined. Patient-reported outcome measures were symptoms (pain, Oxford Hip Score [OHS], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and quality of life (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3L questionnaire).
Results
94.6% completed the anchor questions, of whom 80.1% reporting “much improved function” 1 year after surgery. Discriminative abilities of thresholds were not good (area under the curve < 0.8). Tercile-specific determination of thresholds improved discrimination and reliability (+10%). Minimal clinically important change values were higher for all outcomes (eg, change in OHS ≥ 24.5 vs ≥ 10.5) in patients with more severe preoperative symptoms. Patient-acceptable symptom state scores for European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions index (≥ 0.809) and OHS (≥ 40.5) showed good discrimination (area under the curve > 0.8). Patients with less symptoms required lower postoperative scores for reporting “much improved function” (postoperative OHS ≥ 38.5 vs 42.5). Tercile-specific thresholds did not improve accuracy of thresholds (Cohens kappa 42%).
Conclusions
The present study demonstrates that patients with more severe preoperative symptoms require greater change scores to achieve clinically relevant improvements than patients with less severe preoperative symptoms. This study suggests that current one-size-fits-all thresholds for success of THA should be replaced with more nuanced thresholds.
患者报告结果的临床意义阈值与定义和预测全髋关节置换术(tha)的成功相关。定义和提供阈值必须考虑术前症状的严重程度。方法回顾性研究荷兰关节置换登记(2016-2018)登记的40213例首次全髋关节置换术,采用受者操作曲线分析来定义具有锚点功能转变的最小临床重要变化和患者可接受的症状状态。确定了应定义独立阈值的亚组。患者报告的结局指标为症状(疼痛、牛津髋关节评分[OHS]、髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分)和生活质量(欧洲生活质量5维度3L问卷)。结果94.6%的患者完成了主要问题,其中80.1%的患者报告术后1年“功能明显改善”。阈值的判别能力较差(曲线下面积<;0.8)。特异性阈值的确定提高了鉴别和信度(+10%)。在术前症状更严重的患者中,所有结果的最小临床重要变化值都更高(例如,OHS变化≥24.5 vs≥10.5)。患者可接受的欧洲生活质量5维度指数(≥0.809)和OHS(≥40.5)的症状状态评分具有良好的辨别能力(曲线下面积>;0.8)。症状较轻的患者报告“功能明显改善”所需的术后评分较低(术后OHS≥38.5 vs 42.5)。特异性阈值没有提高阈值的准确性(Cohens kappa为42%)。结论术前症状较重的患者比术前症状较轻的患者需要更高的改变评分才能达到临床相关的改善。这项研究表明,目前的全髋关节置换术成功的一刀切的阈值应该被更细致的阈值所取代。证据等级:III级,治疗性研究。
期刊介绍:
Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.