Health and equity considerations in policy and practice related to sustainable transportation interventions in four Canadian cities

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102009
Wendy Verity , Zoé Poirier Stephens , Helena Lin , Callista A. Ottoni , Eve Bourgeois , Yan Kestens , Daniel Fuller , Kevin Manaugh , Meghan Winters
{"title":"Health and equity considerations in policy and practice related to sustainable transportation interventions in four Canadian cities","authors":"Wendy Verity ,&nbsp;Zoé Poirier Stephens ,&nbsp;Helena Lin ,&nbsp;Callista A. Ottoni ,&nbsp;Eve Bourgeois ,&nbsp;Yan Kestens ,&nbsp;Daniel Fuller ,&nbsp;Kevin Manaugh ,&nbsp;Meghan Winters","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities around the world are making major investments in sustainable transportation infrastructure in response to diverse societal challenges. These projects have the potential to advance healthy cities, but it is unknown to what extent municipalities incorporate health and equity goals into sustainable transportation policy and practice. We provide an empirical analysis of how health and equity were understood, operationalized, and measured in the planning, design, and implementation of four sustainable transportation projects in four Canadian cities, Victoria, Vancouver, Saskatoon, and Montreal, as part of the INTerventions, Equity, Research, and Action in Cities Team (INTERACT) project. We reviewed nine policy documents that guided the sustainable transportation interventions and conducted content analysis to understand how health and equity were referred to within public-facing policy documents. We also interviewed 23 city staff, councillors, or members of advocacy groups who were involved in the planning, design, and implementation of these interventions and conducted framework analysis on the transcripts. We developed themes from integrated findings of our policy scan and interviews with practitioners. We found that health was broadly used in the policy framing, and that safety and modal shift towards active modes were key health outcomes in both policy and practice. Other health outcomes were described as co-benefits but were minimally operationalized and had limited influence on the prioritization of municipal investments. Equity priorities in policies and practice centered on design and implementation features geared towards equity-deserving groups and accessibility for all ages and abilities. Participants emphasized the importance of policy and political will for advancing equity goals and navigating trade-offs between prioritizing high-use or equity-focused routes. Participants also described challenges with measuring health (due to institutional mandates) and equity (due to lack of disaggregated data). These findings highlight the opportunities for clearer direction in policy and practice in relation to health and equity goals in sustainable transportation interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 102009"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities around the world are making major investments in sustainable transportation infrastructure in response to diverse societal challenges. These projects have the potential to advance healthy cities, but it is unknown to what extent municipalities incorporate health and equity goals into sustainable transportation policy and practice. We provide an empirical analysis of how health and equity were understood, operationalized, and measured in the planning, design, and implementation of four sustainable transportation projects in four Canadian cities, Victoria, Vancouver, Saskatoon, and Montreal, as part of the INTerventions, Equity, Research, and Action in Cities Team (INTERACT) project. We reviewed nine policy documents that guided the sustainable transportation interventions and conducted content analysis to understand how health and equity were referred to within public-facing policy documents. We also interviewed 23 city staff, councillors, or members of advocacy groups who were involved in the planning, design, and implementation of these interventions and conducted framework analysis on the transcripts. We developed themes from integrated findings of our policy scan and interviews with practitioners. We found that health was broadly used in the policy framing, and that safety and modal shift towards active modes were key health outcomes in both policy and practice. Other health outcomes were described as co-benefits but were minimally operationalized and had limited influence on the prioritization of municipal investments. Equity priorities in policies and practice centered on design and implementation features geared towards equity-deserving groups and accessibility for all ages and abilities. Participants emphasized the importance of policy and political will for advancing equity goals and navigating trade-offs between prioritizing high-use or equity-focused routes. Participants also described challenges with measuring health (due to institutional mandates) and equity (due to lack of disaggregated data). These findings highlight the opportunities for clearer direction in policy and practice in relation to health and equity goals in sustainable transportation interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在加拿大四个城市中,与可持续交通干预措施有关的政策和实践中的健康和公平考虑
世界各地的城市正在对可持续交通基础设施进行重大投资,以应对各种社会挑战。这些项目有可能促进健康城市,但尚不清楚市政当局在多大程度上将健康和公平目标纳入可持续交通政策和实践。作为城市干预、公平、研究和行动团队(INTERACT)项目的一部分,我们对加拿大四个城市(维多利亚、温哥华、萨斯卡通和蒙特利尔)的四个可持续交通项目的规划、设计和实施过程中,健康和公平是如何被理解、运作和衡量的进行了实证分析。我们审查了指导可持续交通干预措施的九份政策文件,并进行了内容分析,以了解在面向公众的政策文件中如何提及健康和公平。我们还采访了23名参与规划、设计和实施这些干预措施的城市工作人员、议员或倡导团体成员,并对记录进行了框架分析。我们从政策扫描和从业者访谈的综合发现中开发了主题。我们发现,健康在政策框架中被广泛使用,安全和模式向主动模式的转变是政策和实践中的关键健康结果。其他保健成果被描述为共同利益,但很少付诸实施,对市政投资的优先次序影响有限。政策和实践中的公平优先事项集中在设计和实施面向应享有公平的群体和所有年龄和能力的无障碍的特点上。与会者强调了政策和政治意愿对推进公平目标的重要性,并在优先考虑高利用率路线和注重公平路线之间进行权衡。与会者还描述了衡量健康(由于机构任务规定)和公平(由于缺乏分类数据)方面的挑战。这些调查结果突出表明,有机会在可持续交通干预措施的健康和公平目标方面制定更明确的政策和实践方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Community factors associated with the prevalence of pedestrian barrier removal plans in U.S. municipalities The interplay of home and work neighbourhood environment characteristics and associations with active commuting Informing health-oriented transport planning through aerial-based analysis of trip generation behaviour using aerial data Updating the Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ): A new Spanish adaptation and validation Mapping the knowledge landscape of school travel research: Environmental, psychosocial, health, and policy perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1