Development of an eDNA-based qPCR and dPCR method for detecting the spatial distribution and relative abundance of the critically endangered Giant Barb (Catlocarpio siamensis)

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03511
Jesdakorn Ongkulee , Chatmongkon Suwannapoom , Toshifumi Minamoto , Maslin Osathanunkul
{"title":"Development of an eDNA-based qPCR and dPCR method for detecting the spatial distribution and relative abundance of the critically endangered Giant Barb (Catlocarpio siamensis)","authors":"Jesdakorn Ongkulee ,&nbsp;Chatmongkon Suwannapoom ,&nbsp;Toshifumi Minamoto ,&nbsp;Maslin Osathanunkul","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Giant Barb (<em>Catlocarpio siamensis</em>) is the largest freshwater fish in the Cyprinidae family and is found in several countries, including Thailand. Due to its large size, it has been a popular food source for local communities. However, the population of this species has drastically declined due to overfishing, habitat destruction, and water pollution. Consequently, the Giant Barb is now classified as Critically Endangered (CR) on the IUCN Red List, and there have been reports of its absence from some rivers. Monitoring Giant Barb’s distribution is essential for developing appropriate conservation strategies. Here, we developed environmental DNA (eDNA) assays using qPCR and dPCR for detecting and monitoring the Giant Barb. Both eDNA-based methods were successful in detecting Giant Barb eDNA, with dPCR being more sensitive, detected the Giant Barb at 27 out of 31 sites, whereas qPCR detected it at 14 sites. The average eDNA concentrations for qPCR varied from 0.522 to 0.716 copies/µl, while dPCR had a broader range of 0.470–0.871 copies/µl. dPCR detected fish eDNA at all seven visually confirmed sites, whereas qPCR only detected it at three locations. In the present study, dPCR demonstrated better performance in acquiring distribution data, making it important for detecting and monitoring endangered fish species. This eDNA-based method of conservation offers hope and assistance for protecting this important species and preserving our freshwater habitats.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article e03511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235198942500112X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Giant Barb (Catlocarpio siamensis) is the largest freshwater fish in the Cyprinidae family and is found in several countries, including Thailand. Due to its large size, it has been a popular food source for local communities. However, the population of this species has drastically declined due to overfishing, habitat destruction, and water pollution. Consequently, the Giant Barb is now classified as Critically Endangered (CR) on the IUCN Red List, and there have been reports of its absence from some rivers. Monitoring Giant Barb’s distribution is essential for developing appropriate conservation strategies. Here, we developed environmental DNA (eDNA) assays using qPCR and dPCR for detecting and monitoring the Giant Barb. Both eDNA-based methods were successful in detecting Giant Barb eDNA, with dPCR being more sensitive, detected the Giant Barb at 27 out of 31 sites, whereas qPCR detected it at 14 sites. The average eDNA concentrations for qPCR varied from 0.522 to 0.716 copies/µl, while dPCR had a broader range of 0.470–0.871 copies/µl. dPCR detected fish eDNA at all seven visually confirmed sites, whereas qPCR only detected it at three locations. In the present study, dPCR demonstrated better performance in acquiring distribution data, making it important for detecting and monitoring endangered fish species. This eDNA-based method of conservation offers hope and assistance for protecting this important species and preserving our freshwater habitats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于edna的qPCR和dPCR检测濒危巨倒钩空间分布和相对丰度方法的建立
巨型倒钩鱼(Catlocarpio siamensis)是鲤科最大的淡水鱼,在包括泰国在内的几个国家都有发现。由于它的体积大,它一直是当地社区的一种受欢迎的食物来源。然而,由于过度捕捞、栖息地破坏和水污染,该物种的数量急剧下降。因此,在世界自然保护联盟的红色名录上,巨型倒钩现在被列为极度濒危物种(CR),有报道称一些河流中已经没有了它。监测巨型倒钩的分布对于制定适当的保护策略至关重要。本研究利用qPCR和dPCR技术建立了环境DNA (eDNA)检测和监测巨倒钩的方法。两种基于eDNA的方法都能成功检测到Giant Barb,其中dPCR更敏感,在31个位点中检测到27个,而qPCR检测到14个位点。qPCR的平均eDNA浓度范围为0.522 ~ 0.716 copies/µl,而dPCR的范围更广,为0.470 ~ 0.871 copies/µl。dPCR在所有7个目测位点检测到鱼的eDNA,而qPCR仅在3个位点检测到。在本研究中,dPCR在获取分布数据方面表现出较好的性能,对濒危鱼类的检测和监测具有重要意义。这种基于edna的保护方法为保护这一重要物种和保护我们的淡水栖息地提供了希望和帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
期刊最新文献
New species-specific allometric models for above- and below-ground biomass and carbon content of young mangroves Humidity and gap history drive predation pressure on large carabids in a managed temperate forest Effects of dietary fatty acid composition and salinity on copepod reproduction in a eutrophic estuary Leap, frog: Toad-proof agricultural infrastructure for landscape-level management of cane toads. Diffuse-porous and ring-porous xylem types did not influence branch hydraulic responses along a rural-urban gradient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1