Tao Wei, Xuanmei Fan, Mingyao Xia, Danny Love Wamba Djukem, Shaojian Qi, Xinxin Zhang
{"title":"Hanging wall effects on cross-fault slope failures: Shaking table experiment insights","authors":"Tao Wei, Xuanmei Fan, Mingyao Xia, Danny Love Wamba Djukem, Shaojian Qi, Xinxin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Earthquake-triggered landslides are prone to occur on the hanging wall of faults, yet the failure mechanism of co-seismic landslides affected by reverse faulting remains poorly understood. In this study, we explore the dynamic response and failure mechanism of cross-fault slopes by conducting reverse fault physical modeling on large-scale shaking table model testing. A novel movable model box with a sliding bottom plate and an air cushion is used to simulate the reverse faulting of the horizontal layered slope models with fault dip angles of 30° and 50°. We analyze the effect of different reverse fault angles on the dynamic response and failure patterns, using various seismic waves, Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT), and particle image velocimetry (PIV). The results indicate that the dip angle of the reverse fault dislocation is crucial in influencing the dynamic response of the cross-fault slope. The 30° model is more sensitive to frequency changes and is prone to resonance at 24 Hz, while the 50° model produces stronger dynamic response to high amplitude seismic waves. Reverse fault dislocation amplifies the dynamic response and Hilbert energy at the hanging wall, with a larger amplification coefficient observed at a 30° dip angle. Slope models with different dip angles of the reverse fault produce distinct Hilbert energy distributions, resulting in two typical failure patterns. A “tension-shear” failure pattern, characterized by a shallow sliding surface, occurs in the 50° dip angle model, while a “tension-ejection” failure pattern with a vertical tensile sliding surface occurs in the 30° dip angle model. Our results provide important insights into the behavior of cross-fault slopes during seismic events, and provide guidance for better understanding and managing hazards associated with cross-fault slopes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"350 ","pages":"Article 107985"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001379522500081X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Earthquake-triggered landslides are prone to occur on the hanging wall of faults, yet the failure mechanism of co-seismic landslides affected by reverse faulting remains poorly understood. In this study, we explore the dynamic response and failure mechanism of cross-fault slopes by conducting reverse fault physical modeling on large-scale shaking table model testing. A novel movable model box with a sliding bottom plate and an air cushion is used to simulate the reverse faulting of the horizontal layered slope models with fault dip angles of 30° and 50°. We analyze the effect of different reverse fault angles on the dynamic response and failure patterns, using various seismic waves, Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT), and particle image velocimetry (PIV). The results indicate that the dip angle of the reverse fault dislocation is crucial in influencing the dynamic response of the cross-fault slope. The 30° model is more sensitive to frequency changes and is prone to resonance at 24 Hz, while the 50° model produces stronger dynamic response to high amplitude seismic waves. Reverse fault dislocation amplifies the dynamic response and Hilbert energy at the hanging wall, with a larger amplification coefficient observed at a 30° dip angle. Slope models with different dip angles of the reverse fault produce distinct Hilbert energy distributions, resulting in two typical failure patterns. A “tension-shear” failure pattern, characterized by a shallow sliding surface, occurs in the 50° dip angle model, while a “tension-ejection” failure pattern with a vertical tensile sliding surface occurs in the 30° dip angle model. Our results provide important insights into the behavior of cross-fault slopes during seismic events, and provide guidance for better understanding and managing hazards associated with cross-fault slopes.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.