Socioeconomic developments drove regime shifts of agriculture–ecology–economy nexus of social-ecological system: Four-decade lessons from southeast China

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124729
Xinhua Li , Chong Jiang , Yixin Wang , Xiaohuang Liu , Jie Liu , Jun Wang , Ying Zhao , Yuexin Xiao , Zhiyuan Yang , Ran Wang
{"title":"Socioeconomic developments drove regime shifts of agriculture–ecology–economy nexus of social-ecological system: Four-decade lessons from southeast China","authors":"Xinhua Li ,&nbsp;Chong Jiang ,&nbsp;Yixin Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaohuang Liu ,&nbsp;Jie Liu ,&nbsp;Jun Wang ,&nbsp;Ying Zhao ,&nbsp;Yuexin Xiao ,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Yang ,&nbsp;Ran Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urbanization has been recognized as an effective measure to promote socioeconomic development; however, it leads to cropland and habitat loss and aggravates ecosystem services (ESs), which have not been sufficiently and systematically revealed from the perspective of agriculture–ecology–economy nexus (AEEN). To address these knowledge gaps, this novel study adopted a hotspot of urbanization to examine the response dynamics of ESs and agricultural production to urbanization, as well as their regime shifts and interactions, by employing statistical records, satellite images, and incorporating biophysical model-based ESs into AEEN. In the past four decades, Guangdong has undergone rapid urbanization and associated landscape transformations, represented by cropland and wetland shrinkage and urban expansion, particularly around central city clusters, which have caused ESs degradation and grain productivity reduction. According to the regime shifts of the AEEN sectors and their systematic responses to socioeconomic developments and policy interventions, nexus sector interactions between agriculture and the economy in Phase I (1980–1997) and Phase III (2009–2020) had positive effects, while those in Phase II (1998–2008) were negative because of cropland loss and industrial structure adjustments. Network structure analysis and spatial panel model further revealed that natural environmental, socioeconomic, and landscape composition and structural factors were determinants of ES evolution and regime shifts in AEEN. Structural change analysis and systematic perspectives are essential for understanding the consequences and determinants of urbanization on agricultural production and ecosystem state by placing ESs within AEEN, which is expected to support landscape management and policy formulations for coordinated development that balance multi-sector benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 124729"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725007054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urbanization has been recognized as an effective measure to promote socioeconomic development; however, it leads to cropland and habitat loss and aggravates ecosystem services (ESs), which have not been sufficiently and systematically revealed from the perspective of agriculture–ecology–economy nexus (AEEN). To address these knowledge gaps, this novel study adopted a hotspot of urbanization to examine the response dynamics of ESs and agricultural production to urbanization, as well as their regime shifts and interactions, by employing statistical records, satellite images, and incorporating biophysical model-based ESs into AEEN. In the past four decades, Guangdong has undergone rapid urbanization and associated landscape transformations, represented by cropland and wetland shrinkage and urban expansion, particularly around central city clusters, which have caused ESs degradation and grain productivity reduction. According to the regime shifts of the AEEN sectors and their systematic responses to socioeconomic developments and policy interventions, nexus sector interactions between agriculture and the economy in Phase I (1980–1997) and Phase III (2009–2020) had positive effects, while those in Phase II (1998–2008) were negative because of cropland loss and industrial structure adjustments. Network structure analysis and spatial panel model further revealed that natural environmental, socioeconomic, and landscape composition and structural factors were determinants of ES evolution and regime shifts in AEEN. Structural change analysis and systematic perspectives are essential for understanding the consequences and determinants of urbanization on agricultural production and ecosystem state by placing ESs within AEEN, which is expected to support landscape management and policy formulations for coordinated development that balance multi-sector benefits.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会经济发展推动社会生态系统中农业-生态-经济关系的制度变迁:中国东南地区40年的经验
城市化已被公认为促进社会经济发展的有效措施;然而,从农业-生态-经济关系的角度来看,农业-生态-经济关系并没有充分和系统地揭示农业-生态-经济关系导致的耕地和栖息地的丧失和生态系统服务功能的恶化。为了解决这些知识空白,本研究以城市化为研究热点,利用统计记录、卫星图像,并将基于生物物理模型的生态系统纳入AEEN,研究生态系统和农业生产对城市化的响应动态,以及它们之间的机制转变和相互作用。在过去的40年里,广东经历了快速的城市化和相关的景观变化,以农田和湿地的萎缩和城市的扩张为代表,特别是在中心城市群周围,这导致了生态系统退化和粮食生产力下降。研究表明,在第一阶段(1980-1997年)和第三阶段(2009-2020年),农业与经济的关联部门相互作用具有正向影响,而在第二阶段(1998-2008年),由于耕地流失和产业结构调整,农业与经济的关联部门相互作用具有负向影响。网络结构分析和空间面板模型进一步揭示,自然环境、社会经济、景观组成和结构因素是影响生态系统演化和制度变迁的决定性因素。结构变化分析和系统视角对于理解城市化对农业生产和生态系统状态的影响和决定因素至关重要,通过将生态系统纳入城市生态系统,这有望为景观管理和政策制定提供支持,以实现平衡多部门利益的协调发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Understanding weather index-insurance adoption among smallholder farmers in Mali: The role of financial and insurance literacy. A smart recycling object identification system in vending machines based on edge computing platform and Petri net model. Polarity reversal enabled copper cycling in an electro-Fenton-based combined system for suppressed Cu(II) release and enhanced BPA degradation. The asynchronous response of structure and functionality of soil nematode community to Tibetan sheep grazing in an alpine grassland on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Green infrastructure as an operational tool in climate change education: A youth-informed framework for urban adaptation learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1