Understanding the complex knowledge economy toward antimicrobial stewardship in West Bengal, India

Ayako Ebata , Meenakshi Gautham , Anne-Sophie Jung , Mathew Hennessey , Sanghita Bhattacharyya , Gerald Bloom
{"title":"Understanding the complex knowledge economy toward antimicrobial stewardship in West Bengal, India","authors":"Ayako Ebata ,&nbsp;Meenakshi Gautham ,&nbsp;Anne-Sophie Jung ,&nbsp;Mathew Hennessey ,&nbsp;Sanghita Bhattacharyya ,&nbsp;Gerald Bloom","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Knowledge dissemination and awareness raising is a common strategy for fostering antimicrobial stewardship and tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, empirical evidence suggests that the dissemination of technical/biomedical information about AMR, alone, is insufficient to improve antibiotic use in resource-poor settings. This is because antibiotic users’ decisions are based not only on biomedical knowledge but also on social and clinical information that is specific to local healthcare realities, and healthcare providers’ clinical knowledge and judgement. In this article, we propose a framework that identifies knowledge critical to deciding a course of antibiotic treatment for possible infection in resource-poor settings, and how to improve the knowledge flow to improve antibiotic use. Specifically, we focus on understanding three domains of knowledge that guide antibiotic users’ decisions: 1) scientific evidence, and evidence-based treatment guidelines; 2) local knowledge of infection patterns and risks, and the susceptibility of organisms causing infection to different antibiotics; and 3) personal and social characteristics of the patient. Drawing from the theory of information asymmetry and empirical data from West Bengal, India, we show that all three domains of knowledge demonstrated degrees of asymmetry, and community-level practitioners’ knowledge was not effectively taken into account in clinical guidance. We conclude that interventions targeting AMR need to reflect all three knowledge domains to be effective in clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100063"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856225000157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge dissemination and awareness raising is a common strategy for fostering antimicrobial stewardship and tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, empirical evidence suggests that the dissemination of technical/biomedical information about AMR, alone, is insufficient to improve antibiotic use in resource-poor settings. This is because antibiotic users’ decisions are based not only on biomedical knowledge but also on social and clinical information that is specific to local healthcare realities, and healthcare providers’ clinical knowledge and judgement. In this article, we propose a framework that identifies knowledge critical to deciding a course of antibiotic treatment for possible infection in resource-poor settings, and how to improve the knowledge flow to improve antibiotic use. Specifically, we focus on understanding three domains of knowledge that guide antibiotic users’ decisions: 1) scientific evidence, and evidence-based treatment guidelines; 2) local knowledge of infection patterns and risks, and the susceptibility of organisms causing infection to different antibiotics; and 3) personal and social characteristics of the patient. Drawing from the theory of information asymmetry and empirical data from West Bengal, India, we show that all three domains of knowledge demonstrated degrees of asymmetry, and community-level practitioners’ knowledge was not effectively taken into account in clinical guidance. We conclude that interventions targeting AMR need to reflect all three knowledge domains to be effective in clinical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards a common understanding of gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation for health programs and interventions: Evidence from a scoping review Theoretical foundations and mechanisms of health systems responsiveness: a realist synthesis Factors influencing healthcare facility selection in an urban setting in Lao PDR: Findings from a qualitative study Understanding the complex knowledge economy toward antimicrobial stewardship in West Bengal, India Brazilian healthcare bureaucracies and the production of antimicrobial resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1