Artificial intelligence based predictive tools for identifying type 2 diabetes patients at high risk of treatment Non-adherence: A systematic review

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105858
Malede Berihun Yismaw , Chernet Tafere , Bereket Bahiru Tefera , Desalegn Getnet Demsie , Kebede Feyisa , Zenaw Debasu Addisu , Tirsit Ketsela Zeleke , Ebrahim Abdela Siraj , Minichil Chanie Worku , Fasikaw Berihun
{"title":"Artificial intelligence based predictive tools for identifying type 2 diabetes patients at high risk of treatment Non-adherence: A systematic review","authors":"Malede Berihun Yismaw ,&nbsp;Chernet Tafere ,&nbsp;Bereket Bahiru Tefera ,&nbsp;Desalegn Getnet Demsie ,&nbsp;Kebede Feyisa ,&nbsp;Zenaw Debasu Addisu ,&nbsp;Tirsit Ketsela Zeleke ,&nbsp;Ebrahim Abdela Siraj ,&nbsp;Minichil Chanie Worku ,&nbsp;Fasikaw Berihun","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Several Artificial Intelligence (AI) based predictive tools have been developed to predict non-adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Hence, this study aimed to describe and evaluate the methodological quality of AI based predictive tools for identifying T2D patients at high risk of treatment non-adherence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases including, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, MedLine, and Google Scholar search. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the quality of studies. The performances of tools were assessed by Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, recall, C-index, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity or F1 score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most studies measured predictive ability using AUC (75 %), and some only reported precision (25 %), recall (12.5 %), C-index (12.5 %), accuracy (37.5), sensitivity (12.5 %), specificity (12.5 %) or F1 score (25 %). All tools had moderate to high predictive ability (AUC &gt; 0.70). However, only one study conducted external validation. Demographic characteristics, HbA1c, glucose monitoring data, and treatment details were typical factors used in developing tools.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The existing AI based tools holds significant promise for improving diabetes care. However, future studies should focus on refining the existing tools, validating in other settings, and evaluating the cost-effectiveness of AI-supported interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 105858"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Several Artificial Intelligence (AI) based predictive tools have been developed to predict non-adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Hence, this study aimed to describe and evaluate the methodological quality of AI based predictive tools for identifying T2D patients at high risk of treatment non-adherence.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases including, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, MedLine, and Google Scholar search. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the quality of studies. The performances of tools were assessed by Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, recall, C-index, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity or F1 score.

Results

Most studies measured predictive ability using AUC (75 %), and some only reported precision (25 %), recall (12.5 %), C-index (12.5 %), accuracy (37.5), sensitivity (12.5 %), specificity (12.5 %) or F1 score (25 %). All tools had moderate to high predictive ability (AUC > 0.70). However, only one study conducted external validation. Demographic characteristics, HbA1c, glucose monitoring data, and treatment details were typical factors used in developing tools.

Conclusions

The existing AI based tools holds significant promise for improving diabetes care. However, future studies should focus on refining the existing tools, validating in other settings, and evaluating the cost-effectiveness of AI-supported interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence based predictive tools for identifying type 2 diabetes patients at high risk of treatment Non-adherence: A systematic review RelAI: an automated approach to judge pointwise ML prediction reliability Editorial Board Hypothesis: Net benefit as an objective function during development of machine learning algorithms for medical applications Enhancing readmission prediction model in older stroke patients by integrating insight from readiness for hospital discharge: Prospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1